Originally posted by ghost80:
peer acceptance? so you want us to accept whatever shits you throw at us, whatever insults you want to issue, without expecting anything in return? grow up. don't treat us as brainless amateurs. we are not obliged to protect your ass should you screw up anywhere
Well, I was quoted and therefore I will offer you a piece of my mind. I wouldn't be interested to entertain any of your postings if they are not specifically for me. Nobody implied in any way that you are a "brainless amateur", at the same time nobody is particularly interested in what you want to do with your life with your selected group of close friends too. That might explain why you might have had to seek their attention and highlight the plight that nobody beyond your selected few is willing to collaborate. And for your last sentence, I won't even bother should you ever screw up.
Originally posted by AEW5001:when ppl criticise u with gd reason, accept it lah.
argue so much for fark, only make look like gong cb.
when you get fired for good reason, accept it also. dont go around blaming others for your own loss. loser.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
Well, I was quoted and therefore I will offer you a piece of my mind. I wouldn't be interested to entertain any of your postings if they are not specifically for me. Nobody implied in any way that you are a "brainless amateur", at the same time nobody is particularly interested in what you want to do with your life with your selected group of close friends too. That might explain why you might have had to seek their attention and highlight the plight that nobody beyond your selected few is willing to collaborate. And for your last sentence, I won't even bother should you ever screw up.
i'm just reminding everyone of the fact that i do have a brain and should not be treated like an idiot. yes, you won't bother should i screw up, doesn't mean others are like that. the world is cruel. live with it.
Originally posted by ghost80:
when you get fired for good reason, accept it also. dont go around blaming others for your own loss. loser.
real losers only say other ppl are losers.
do chiu really know me?
Originally posted by ghost80:
yes. abuse of leadership, misuse of information, etc etc etc? all provided by a certain person here.let's all be happy and misuse information together, my friends! together we will become the #1 in information misuse for the sake of doing something... retarded. and if you think having that title is an honor, your brain must indeed be filled with fecal matter.
So, bus spotting is retarded? A leader in your definition must be so unhonorable that leaders must be seen as no less worse than someone with a mind filled with, in your words, fecal matter?
Originally posted by ghost80:
hi brother.the whistle-happy few? what whistle-happy few? the ones who attempted to sabotage a certain farewell tour last year by shooting a letter straight up to the transport companies?
yes those people were certainly crackpot. glad that you realised.
Tell you to switch to ghost80 and you immediately complied.
Joey, this is the best self-pwnage I have seen since the Feedback & Admin thread.
Originally posted by AEW5001:
real losers only say other ppl are losers.do chiu really know me?
yes. im fighting a losing battle. i know that. i know i wont win against a bunch of corrupted idiots who can't see the truth, but i'll do my best anyway. that's the spirit of a true fighter.
go ahead. we lost the battle, but we won the war. live with it.
Originally posted by ghost80:
when you get fired for good reason, accept it also. dont go around blaming others for your own loss. loser.i'm just reminding everyone of the fact that i do have a brain and should not be treated like an idiot. yes, you won't bother should i screw up, doesn't mean others are like that. the world is cruel. live with it.
I haven't heard him blaming anyone, so where did you get the conclusion from?
Seriously, I don't see anyone here needing to reassure others that they have a brain. Get a grip on yourself. Since you're not obliged to protect asses when people screw up, I guess you are in a world no less cruel than theirs, while I'd advise that he leaves such matters to karma.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
I haven't heard him blaming anyone, so where did you get the conclusion from?
Seriously, I don't see anyone here needing to reassure others that they have a brain. Get a grip on yourself. Since you're not obliged to protect asses when people screw up, I guess you are in a world no less cruel than theirs, while I'd advise that he leaves such matters to karma.
oh really? then it must have been his lackeys that keep on whining about it and pointing fingers everywhere around except to their own leader.
and what is the leader doing about it? nothing. so? i'll leave this up to you to decide, but if you have a brain you'd certainly understand what my point is.
dear sir, you have terribly failed as a moderator. hope you know this.
Originally posted by ghost80:
peer acceptance? so you want us to accept whatever shits you throw at us, whatever insults you want to issue, without expecting anything in return? grow up. don't treat us as brainless amateurs. we are not obliged to protect your ass should you screw up anywhere.if you guys actually just THOUGHT that bus spotting was just about the sport itself, think again. for those who can't get along well with others and like to downplay others with no valid reason, i dont figure what you deserve from us.
respect is earned, not a given right. period.
So, I must get along with you to ensure I do not "deserve" from you? You'll have a hard time earning my respect.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
So, I must get along with you to ensure I do not "deserve" from you? You'll have a hard time earning my respect.
it's not just u.
it's ours.
if he sees me anywhere, i will fark him upside down.
^tamago^ had failed in his duty as a moderator to moderate offensive posts.
choosing to participate in the flame war.
'nuff said.
is ghost80 = busesINgapore? always use quote de
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
So, I must get along with you to ensure I do not "deserve" from you? You'll have a hard time earning my respect.
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:^tamago^ had failed in his duty as a moderator to moderate offensive posts.
choosing to participate in the flame war.
'nuff said.
More like trying to force you to surrender your powers to Mark and his gang.
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:^tamago^ had failed in his duty as a moderator to moderate offensive posts.
choosing to participate in the flame war.
'nuff said.
are u degrading him? then can i degrade u as: ur loyalty in this bus community = FAIL?
Originally posted by AEW5001:
it's not just u.it's ours.
if he sees me anywhere, i will fark him upside down.
Exactly. Mark has decided to make his problem everyone else's problem.
Originally posted by ghost80:
oh really? then it must have been his lackeys that keep on whining about it and pointing fingers everywhere around except to their own leader.and what is the leader doing about it? nothing. so? i'll leave this up to you to decide, but if you have a brain you'd certainly understand what my point is.
dear sir, you have terribly failed as a moderator. hope you know this.
There is nothing wrong to attribute the cause to someone they believe is the cause. It's just that some people are more vocal, while others feel the need to refrain from adding to the excessive anger, even if they feel the same as the people who are vocal. Maybe your numbers are so small no one could afford to not defend against the barrage of anguish, so you will not understand that winning the argument is everything, but having the right mind to see the larger picture. Or maybe everyone of you all are vocal, so we had so much noises coming from that few people.
For your last paragraph, I don't entertain sweeping statements nor do I need your useless judgment to provide the kind of guidance I need in my life.
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:^tamago^ had failed in his duty as a moderator to moderate offensive posts.
choosing to participate in the flame war.
'nuff said.
Are any of my posts culpable of flaming? Think before you speak. If I edited them away, you'd accuse me of not being impartial. So much for consistency.
One can need to tell the difference between flaming and logical argument by looking at this and this.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
http://buses.sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/429316?page=3
Both S.Solitaire and SBS7503X and subsequent posts after 7 pages that led to this.
Aren't their posts culpable of flaming? Or so to speak, moderating the tone of the posts?
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/429316?page=3
Both S.Solitaire and SBS7503X and subsequent posts after 7 pages that led to this.
Aren't their posts culpable of flaming?
I don't advocate nor participate in flame wars, but neither am I going to barge in against their will if they are in the middle of an argument, because it will not be quelled. One side has good reasons to back their argument not to take shots inside bus interchanges, the other side insist they are not inside the interchange at that time and are providing their reasons and evidences.
But the next thing I see is Danish describing Samuel as a "stupid piece of shit", and then subsequently seeking further provocation by instigating a fight with the regular group of peaceful users in the forums. That's when I have to step in.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
I don't advocate nor participate in flame wars, but neither am I going to barge in against their will if they are in the middle of an argument, because it will not be quelled. One side has good reasons to back their argument not to take shots inside bus interchanges, the other side insist they are not inside the interchange at that time and are providing their reasons and evidences.
But the next thing I see is Danish describing Samuel as a "stupid piece of shit". That's when I have to step in.
Or so to speak, moderating the tone of the posts? isn't that part of a moderator's duty?
that could have led to less flames and less assumptions that lacks evidences.
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
Or so to speak, moderating the tone of the posts? isn't that part of a moderator's duty?that could have led to less flames and less assumptions that lacks evidences.
I don't feel it warrants editing the posts, as it might not be as beneficial compared to preserving the essence of a legitmate argument.
Flame wars are inevitable, but we cannot just go about quelling every single legitmate argument at its onset and assume all will turn into some kind of flame war. It will kill the spirit of healthy discussion. We have to do risk assessment all the time because...
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
Or so to speak, moderating the tone of the posts? isn't that part of a moderator's duty?that could have led to less flames and less assumptions that lacks evidences.
Trying to play Good Cop, Bad Cop here?
If you guys keep flaming every bus in Singapore's going to be burnt.
wah i missed the show. but i had a good 9hrs 20mins sleep so i guess it's fine.
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
Or so to speak, moderating the tone of the posts? isn't that part of a moderator's duty?that could have led to less flames and less assumptions that lacks evidences.
once a debate turns into a personal attack, things are no longer the same.
that's wad happened here.