Redeployments (Part 13)
-
SBS9400X
(Non-User Lay-Up Status till 27 June 2012)
(De-registered) -
Originally posted by SBS8032G:
SBS9400X
(Non-User Lay-Up Status till 27 June 2012) (De-registered)Man that's sad. Guess the structural damage was too severe to be roadworthy again even if it's repaired.
But its spare parts would be put to good use i guess. -
Originally posted by ahjack 77:
Ehh 8863A wasn't perm at all. Was on a regular cameo on 55 and was on same slot for several days only. Now is under AMDEP SP status
I see. I think it's more of BRBP SP. Today on 139.
-
An1 noe 7320G 7631 and 9642P Status as of now?
-
Originally posted by WRIGHT_B9TL_L0V3R:
An1 noe 7320G 7631 and 9642P Status as of now?
All still laid up till their respective dates.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
All still laid up till their respective dates.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
All still laid up till their respective dates.
-
Originally posted by WRIGHT_B9TL_L0V3R:
An1 noe 7320G 7631 and 9642P Status as of now?
+ 2786D
-
SBS6013A
(AMDEP 53)
(BRBP 131) Perm stix -
Originally posted by SBS494J:
SBS5161L
BR 139
BR 26 (Perm Stix at Coinbox)*Bus out from 26 TBC. Bus into 139 also TBC (or may have been replaced by the DD).
Then, i just want to ask something.
1) Since when did SBS8863A is perm 55/55A? I always see it on any random BRBP Services namely 88/145 etc.
2) Since when did SBS5100M even perm 139? I still don't think that it even permed 139 at all. There were times i see on 55 but did not get the chance to glance at the Coinbox.
i believe 5100 permed sv139 briefly b4 being switched back to sv55. -
Originally posted by SBS8032G:
SBS9400X
(Non-User Lay-Up Status till 27 June 2012) (De-registered)
-
Originally posted by TownLink 291:
SBS6013A
(AMDEP 53) (BRBP 131) Perm stixSBS5227G replaced SBS8777R on 55, which went to 53 to replace SBS6013A?
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Swop with SBS6055D?
So is it 6055D or 8777R? You posted 8777R likely to be the one that came over to 53 in the Suspected Redeployments thread, then here you said 6055D. So which one are you guessing exactly? It can't be both buses at the same time doing 6013A's timing on 53 yeah, even if you are just guessing.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
So is it 6055D or 8777R? You posted 8777R likely to be the one that came over to 53 in the Suspected Redeployments thread, then here you said 6055D. So which one are you guessing exactly? It can't be both buses at the same time doing 6013A's timing on 53 yeah, even if you are just guessing.
Edits made
-
SBS5060U
(AM 58) (AM 410)
New 'SV 410' perm stix pasted right above the BC cabin's aircon controls. Previous 58 perm stix removed. No idea which bus this replaces, nor the replacement on 58. If anyone knows, please clarify. -
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
SBS5060U
(AM 58) (AM 410)
New 'SV 410' perm stix pasted right above the BC cabin's aircon controls. Previous 58 perm stix removed. No idea which bus this replaces, nor the replacement on 58. If anyone knows, please clarify.
it might have been replaced with a DD, given the influx of DDs on sv58 recently.meanwhile, sv410 could have gotten a fleet add as a result.
-
by the way which bus is replacing 705r on arbp5?
-
Originally posted by AEW5001:
it might have been replaced with a DD, given the influx of DDs on sv58 recently.meanwhile, sv410 could have gotten a fleet add as a result.
But someone edited 9035S & 9045M as out to SP already after 9224M & 9616R went into 58. So the fleet is kinda messed up now, because im not sure 9224M & 9616R went in and really kicked out those 2 LOs or some other buses instead.
Anyway, 410's timetable online had a new one up WEF 14 Nov (this past Mon). Probably the fleet add was only added from this week.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
But someone edited 9035S & 9045M as out to SP already after 9224M & 9616R went into 58. So the fleet is kinda messed up now, because im not sure 9224M & 9616R went in and really kicked out those 2 LOs or some other buses instead.
Anyway, 410's timetable online had a new one up WEF 14 Nov (this past Mon). Probably the fleet add was only added from this week.
the 2 LOs u mentioned could have been laid-up, as i have not heard abt them recently. -
Originally posted by AEW5001:
the 2 LOs u mentioned could have been laid-up, as i have not heard abt them recently.
I saw 9035S on 22 yesterday. -
9045M I remember only had strong aircon in the night and morning (read lousy aircon). That was in the early-mid 2000s with 72. And in the afternoons, I sweat it out even more on 9037L which by far had the worst aircon I've known and was still not fixed the last time I took it a couple of years ago. Wonder where's 9144K and 9101J now. Both were fairly new comers like 9037L to 72 unlike 9002L, 9054L, 9199C. I don't really miss 72's LO fleet though. They left a bad impression on the LOs in general.
9035S was a chiongster on 161, but not quite as fast as 9171G which at one point had no speed limit and a gear setting similar to the VO3X.
-
Originally posted by AEW5001:
the 2 LOs u mentioned could have been laid-up, as i have not heard abt them recently.Then this person must be giving fake information.
-
Originally posted by Kira™:
SBS9496U still on 241 YTD. How you explain this?
Because SBS7200U was "Unreported" Non-User Lay Up Status/redeployed, SBS9496U is now on 2 services.
Oh, and I saw SBS9496U on 246 this mornin', and the previous week. How you explain that? Remember, this is no cameo!
-
Originally posted by WRIGHT_B9TL_L0V3R:
An1 noe 7320G 7631 and 9642P Status as of now?
SBS9642P out of lay-up.
-
Originally posted by SBS8032G:
SBS9642P out of lay-up.
Great.