Originally posted by SBS7557R:Then what's with SBS9631X's argument in cameo spotting thread that SBS9546J replaced SBS628R?
I went by my observation with my own eyes that 9546J started appearing on 9 the same time period that 628R went MIA & subsequently de-registered. Probablly the starter alternated the bus to be on 628R's timings then & now between 9546J & 988B, that I can't say for sure.
But as you know BNDEP redeployments are based solely on observation, & I'm not sure whether did 9 had a timetable change from 1 ASD to 1 ADD or not (no e-timetable to confirm), I had to most likely concur that 9546J was the likeliest to be replacing 628R. So since 'SBS2615P' posted that 988B is the one replacing 628R, then that should be the replacement since usually 1 SD replace for 1 SD.
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:I went by my observation with my own eyes that 9546J started appearing on 9 the same time period that 628R went MIA & subsequently de-registered. Probablly the starter alternated the bus to be on 628R's timings then & now between 9546J & 988B, that I can't say for sure.
But as you know BNDEP redeployments are based solely on observation, & I'm not sure whether did 9 had a timetable change from 1 ASD to 1 ADD or not (no e-timetable to confirm), I had to most likely concur that 9546J was the likeliest to be replacing 628R. So since 'SBS2615P' posted that 988B is the one replacing 628R, then that should be the replacement since usually 1 SD replace for 1 SD.
when 9546J went to 9 628R was still around 9546J got replaced by wrights it went over before 628R went MIA
Originally posted by SBS2615P:when 9546J went to 9 628R was still around 9546J got replaced by wrights it went over before 628R went MIA
Oh really uh? My bad then.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:SMB108J
(KJDEP 925)(WLDEP SP) - on Service 858 today
SMB109G
(KJDEP SP)(WLDEP SP) - on Service 858 today
SMB109G is also seen on 858 on 20/12/2011.
SBS9181C
Is still AMDEP 59 and NOT AMDEP SP.
Bus still on Sv 59. Spotted it today at around 11.45am towards Bishan at Braddell. Perm sticker is the same sticker i saw 8610M has.
- I think there is a KUB out from 59 as well, as 7724X is on a WAB slot. Cannot be 8709M because it's already being replaced by 8610M
Originally posted by SBS494J:SBS9181C
Is still AMDEP 59 and NOT AMDEP SP.
Bus still on Sv 59. Spotted it today at around 11.45am towards Bishan at Braddell. Perm sticker is the same sticker i saw 8610M has.
- I think there is a KUB out from 59 as well, as 7724X is on a WAB slot. Cannot be 8709M because it's already being replaced by 8610M
I believe is 8282B
Originally posted by Gus.chong:SMB109G is also seen on 858 on 20/12/2011.
Then?
For those who still "gong gong" about 950/858 deployment
:
Svc 950 :
SMB19H SMB67T SMB69M SMB70H SMB71E SMB84T SMB98D SMB99B SMB126G SMB127D + TIB959S
Svc 858 :
SMB106P SMB113T SMB119C SMB120Y SMB121U SMB122S SMB124L SMB128B SMB129Z SMB130T SMB131R SMB132M SMB133K SMB168K + SMB60L SMB62G SMB108J SMB109G + SMB134H SMB167M(suspect)
Others :
TIB960L TIB961J
(WLDEP 962)
TIB959S
(WLDEP 962/950SP)
TIB962G TIB966X TIB967T TIB968R
TIB970H TIB971E TIB972C
(WLDEP SP)
M.I.A. :
SMB2E
Not sure :
SMB20C
Originally posted by SMB66X:For those who still "gong gong" about 950/858 deployment
:
Svc 950 :
SMB19H SMB67T SMB69M SMB70H SMB71E SMB84T SMB98D SMB99B SMB126G SMB127D + TIB959SSvc 858 :
SMB106P SMB113T SMB119C SMB120Y SMB121U SMB122S SMB124L SMB128B SMB129Z SMB130T SMB131R SMB132M SMB133K SMB168K + SMB60L SMB62G SMB108J SMB109G + SMB134H SMB167M(suspect)Others :
TIB960L TIB961J
(WLDEP 962)TIB959S
(WLDEP 962/950SP)TIB962G TIB966X TIB967T TIB968R
TIB970H TIB971E TIB972C
(WLDEP SP)M.I.A. :
SMB2ENot sure :
SMB20C
SMB20C is now WLDEP TRG.
Originally posted by SMB66X:Then?
today got 1 citaro on sv858.
SBS3006R
(BN 168)
tis deployment is confirmed after at least 2wks of observation. outgoing unknown.
i also havent seen SMB2E for a very long time,only seen it parking at WLDEP
So basically,all JB-reg OCs on 858 had been transferred to 950.
Originally posted by AEW5001:SBS3006R
(BN 168)tis deployment is confirmed after at least 2wks of observation. outgoing unknown.
I think 9308E out ytd on 17 saw no 168 stix on driver window
And 9418X On 17 ytd too
Originally posted by WRIGHT_B9TL_L0V3R:I think 9308E out ytd on 17 saw no 168 stix on driver window
And 9418X On 17 ytd too
Given that BNDEP has not updated their buses' perm stickers for at least half a year already, and the period in which 9308E went in 168, I think 9308E never had a 168 perm sticker to begin with when it went to 168? Correct me if i'm wrong. ![]()
Originally posted by Gus.chong:SMB20C is now WLDEP TRG.
Source?
what happen to TIB366C? why lay up?
Originally posted by SMB189A:what happen to TIB366C? why lay up?
8282b from 59 has kept doing cameo
Originally posted by SMB66X:For those who still "gong gong" about 950/858 deployment
:
Svc 950 :
SMB19H SMB67T SMB69M SMB70H SMB71E SMB84T SMB98D SMB99B SMB126G SMB127D + TIB959SSvc 858 :
SMB106P SMB113T SMB119C SMB120Y SMB121U SMB122S SMB124L SMB128B SMB129Z SMB130T SMB131R SMB132M SMB133K SMB168K + SMB60L SMB62G SMB108J SMB109G + SMB134H SMB167M(suspect)
SMB2E
SMB2E I have a strong feeling it isn't WLDEP 178 perm unless people can prove it to me that they see this bus from monday to friday. So far on weekends the 5th slot is almost empty and I still see random scanias doing 178 almost every weekend on that block, with occasionally some mercz doing that block on sunday.
Monday's sequence is 637X 638T (742A) TIB654X TIB669D TIB670Z (TIB847G) TIB375B (TIB789R) TIB837K and (TIB818R).
SBS3017J
(BBDEP SP) - on Service 99 today
SBS9663D
HGDEP 87
SLBP 97
SBS2596K
BBDEP 285
BBDEP 506
TIB905Y
(KJDEP/BBBP 941)
(GLDEP TRG)
Originally posted by SBS7557R:TIB905Y
(KJDEP/BBBP 941)(GLDEP TRG)
U very sure about this ah??Apparently i saw someone posted in fb today that it's ez link readers r still there.So r u just saying it after seeing me post about it in another topic here that it was parking at the Geylang Lor 1 Terminal together with the perm training UDs?? =.=
And just to let u know,it wasnt parking there from yesterday.
Originally posted by SMB66X:Source?
He still hasnt replied to u regarding that.I wonder if he is still digging around for that source.![]()
![]()