DBBTM Spotting (Aug 2011)
-
Dearest idiot ^tamago^, Please change the topic name back to Cameo Spotting. Thanks.
TIB477R on 922 -
22/8/2011
SBS 2835X(BBDEP 175)on Svc 166
SBS 5139C(SLBP 97)on Svc 143
SBS 8857T(AMDEP 22)on Svc 54
SBS 9154G(BRBP SP)on Svc 88
SBS 9545L(HGDEP 165)on Svc 74TIB 522T(WLDEP/WRBP 961)on Svc 980
-
Fri:
SBS2718B - 7 (BBDEP SP)
SBS9559Y - 12 (BNDEP SP)
SBS906M - 222 (BNDEP 9)
SBS2604X - 229 (BNDEP SP) -
Sat:
SBS2697C - 7 (BBDEP SP)
SBS5130B - 196 (ARBP 95) -
SBS839Z - 48 (ARBP 16)
SBS2735B - 48 (ARBP 95)
SBS2781S - 48 (ARBP 16) -
22.8.2011
SBS8516C (BRBP 94/8*), SBS8526Z (BRBP 145) on 60
SBS9459C (BNDEP SP) on 291
SBS6059T (BNDEP SP) on 28
SBS695X (BNDEP SP) on 15 -
22/8/2011
- SBS1960Z on svc 18 (BNDEP SP)
- SBS9314L on svc 37 (BNDEP 168)
- SBS5110J on svc 38 (BNDEP 225)
- SBS9321R on svc 65 (BBDEP SP)
- SBS637P on svc 69 (BNDEP SP)
- SBS778R on svc 69 (BNDEP SP)
- SBS1940G on svc 69 (BNDEP 18)
- SBS9411P on svc 291 (BNDEP SP)
- SBS9819Y on svc 291 (BNDEP 69)
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
EVERYONE!!! WHO WANTS TITLE TO CHANGE BACK TO CAMEO SPOTTING!!! REPLY WIF THIS EXPRESSION"
"!!! PROVE THAT THIS TITLE SUCKS!!!So you're saying that buses[IN]gapore's interpretation of cameos sucks???
-
Originally posted by ghost79:
So you're saying that buses[IN]gapore's interpretation of cameos sucks???
Nobody asked Alan neo change the title too
Mod has big ego problems?
-
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
Nobody asked Alan neo change the title too
Mod has big ego problems?
somehow this must hurt you so much that you have to resort to name-calling. so i ask, does it hurt that much to equate cameos to "different buses breaking the monotone" if that came out of you? show us some consistency, will you?
-
JUST CHANGE BACK. Other forums never havr stupid problems like this, you know?
-
Originally posted by dan474:
JUST CHANGE BACK. Other forums never havr stupid problems like this, you know?
In fact, did anyone request the "mod" the change in the title? Nope. -
Originally posted by dan474:
JUST CHANGE BACK. Other forums never havr stupid problems like this, you know?
Did you encounter any problems understanding cameos as DBBTM's? If you had not then there isn't a problem.
-
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
In fact, did anyone request the "mod" the change in the title? Nope.yawnz. u and your group's "cameo"
no need to define cameo.
-
Originally posted by buses[IN]gapore!:
In fact, did anyone request the "mod" the change in the title? Nope.
Anyone request then I have to change? Apart from your group of friends, no one has objected to the change to DBBTM. Ain't you glad I've decided to accept your views and make them mine? I'm not going to use the term "cameos" or "rare cameos", just like you.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
Did you encounter any problems understanding cameos as DBBTM's? If you had not there isn't a problem.
Is this just one of your umpteen acts of sulking for your loss of job through your own fault?
The name was fine, short and sweet and you had to to over-inflate the title. Good riddance.
If you are unwilling to reverse the title for whatever ulterior reasons, just state so.
TL;DR : Change the back to the previous one and we will all be happy
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
Is this just one of your umpteen acts of sulking for your loss of job through your own fault?
The name was fine, short and sweet and you had to to over-inflate the title. Good riddance.
If you are unwilling to reverse the title for whatever ulterior reasons, just state so.
What's your ulterior motive to sulk over a thread title?
If the thread title is too long, I'll make it shorter in that case.
And please don't continue to judge people's motives like they are yours.
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
Is this just one of your umpteen acts of sulking for your loss of job through your own fault?
The name was fine, short and sweet and you had to to over-inflate the title. Good riddance.
If you are unwilling to reverse the title for whatever ulterior reasons, just state so.
TL;DR : Change the back to the previous one and we will all be happy
A change to the previous title will be an affirmation that we are all spotting cameos. Please, that is not something that we want, right?
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
What's your ulterior motive to sulk over a thread title?
If the thread title is too long, I'll make it shorter in that case.
And please don't continue to judge people's motives like they are yours.
I'm not 'sulking', I'm just asking you to use the previous title of the thread (along with other ppl) but instead you barked bark loudly and flatly refused.
There is no need to abridge the current title, but rather simply use the previous title.
How the hell are your motives the same as mine?
I don't give cameos adulation as much as you do -
Nvm, some ghost from hell is using tamago acc. Its still 7th month :D
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
A change to the previous title will be an affirmation that we are all spotting cameos. Please, that is not something that we want, right?
wow... can you not read? 'Cameo spotting' simply refers to, well the cameos that you have spotted, what else right?
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
wow... can you not read? 'Cameo spotting' simply refers to, well the cameos that you have spotted, what else right?
then what does "different buses breaking the monotone" mean then? someone's narrow interpretation of "cameos"? please don't disappoint me, i do think highly of his views when he pitched this to me.
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
wow... can you not read? 'Cameo spotting' simply refers to, well the cameos that you have spotted, what else right?
If it's hard for you to remember its okay. Here's a backronym to help you remember.
Distance-Based Bizzare Type Monitoring
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
then what does "different buses breaking the monotone" mean then? someone's narrow interpretation of "cameos"? please don't disappoint me, i do think highly of his views when he pitched this to me.
it sounds grossly negative. 'Cameo spotting' sounds a tad more neutral. 'narrow interpretation of cameos'? how the hell do you interpret cameos then?
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
it sounds grossly negative. 'Cameo spotting' sounds a tad more neutral. 'narrow interpretation of cameos'? how the hell do you interpret cameos then?
So you're finally admitting that what buses[in]gapore said was grossly negative then?