Did you know...? (Part 5)
-
Originally posted by SBS8501U:
Our main focus is NOT whether SMRT should import DDs
Our main focus is whether SMRT should to ditch bendies
Do you even understand what I am telling you?
And do you realise that your 2 sentences are the mirror image of each other? The 2 sides of the argument?
-
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
Why isn't anybody attacking my points directly?
The reason is simple.
Because what I just said are facts and realities.
I don't deny bendies have good points.
But they were over-ridden by our needs and constraints.
C'mon.
I want stiffer challenge for this debate.
Why do you guys keep regressing back to the "good things about bendies" while I lay siege to your arguments?
Can't break out out of it?
Divert to http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/451761?page=27 for more debate, if you think that's insufficient
-
Which was dominated by my posts.
?????
-
The reason is simple: I don't even bother to waste my precious time to argue with these kind of people...
-
hahahaha.
No new challenger while I try to figure out the relationship between commodity trading and factor trading???
Dang.
This is not quite as fun as I thought it might be.
-
Seriously, I have better things to do than argue.
Oh you like to argue so much is it? Become a lawyer then...
-
of course... your want to hear what you want to hear... Stubborn people that is...
-
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
hahahaha.
No new challenger while I try to figure out the relationship between commodity trading and factor trading???
Dang.
This is not quite as fun as I thought it might be.
I dun see the honour of challenging for such a stupid debate.
Win won't get anything, lose won't get anything as well.
Whoever wins, whoever loses, must wait till SMRT has results. Now too early liao
-
Originally posted by TIB 501 D:
Seriously, I have better things to do than argue.
Oh you like to argue so much is it? Become a lawyer then...
My GP was a C5.
Couldn't become a lawyer.
-
Originally posted by SBS8501U:
I dun see the honour of challenging for such a stupid debate.
Win won't get anything, lose won't get anything as well.
Whoever wins, whoever loses, must wait till SMRT has results. Now too early liao
You participated in a stupid debate then.
-
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
My GP was a C5.
Couldn't become a lawyer.
Well then, I woildn't want to be sarcastic.
-
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
You participated in a stupid debate then.
You also, I also, snort
-
Originally posted by SBS8501U:
Well then, I woildn't want to be sarcastic.
I can promise you its my fault through and through....so say what may.
Though I appreciate your attempt to veil contempt eh?
-
Originally posted by SBS8501U:
I dun see the honour of challenging for such a stupid debate.
Win won't get anything, lose won't get anything as well.
Whoever wins, whoever loses, must wait till SMRT has results. Now too early liao
No!!! Must win this debate then SMRT will convinced buy bendy like Euro VI Citaro Gs!!! -
228X dun be a firestarter la for God Damm sake
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
No!!! Must win this debate then SMRT will convinced buy bendy like Euro VI Citaro Gs!!!
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
No!!! Must win this debate then SMRT will convinced buy bendy like Euro VI Citaro Gs!!!I think I can help u ssummarize:
"No!!! Must win this debate then SMRT will convinced buy Euro VI Citaro Gs!!!"
-
I dun think Citaro G in their list,More likely is MAN Lion City G or A24 NG363F
-
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
Why isn't anybody attacking my points directly?
The reason is simple.
Because what I just said are facts and realities.
I don't deny bendies have good points.
But they were over-ridden by our needs and constraints.
C'mon.
I want stiffer challenge for this debate.
Why do you guys keep regressing back to the "good things about bendies" while I lay siege to your arguments?
Can't break out out of it?
Is there really a huge problem with bendies being used?
-
Its more a case of choice under constraints.
Or if you like: lesser of 2 evils.
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
I dun think Citaro G in their list,More likely is MAN Lion City G or A24 NG363F
Possibly, otherwise SMRT would have purchased more Citaros, but apparently only have 51 (including demonstrator)
-
Originally posted by SBS8501U:
Possibly, otherwise SMRT would have purchased more Citaros, but apparently only have 51 (including demonstrator)
the Citaros we have are horrendous in terms of drivability, glad SMRT did not mass order them and went to mass order MAN NL323Fs unlike SBST who mass ordered Citaros.... another generation of underpowered buses for SBST then
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
the Citaros we have are horrendous in terms of drivability, glad SMRT did not mass order them and went to mass order MAN NL323Fs unlike SBST who mass ordered Citaros.... another generation of underpowered buses for SBST then
Citaros are not underpowered!!! They save fuel and people travel in class!!! -
Originally posted by SMB228X:
Citaros are not underpowered!!! They save fuel and people travel in class!!!As a matter of fact they are. How you know they save fuel? U got drive before? Isn't it ironic that you like citaros so much that you put a Man A22s rego as ur username?
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
the Citaros we have are horrendous in terms of drivability, glad SMRT did not mass order them and went to mass order MAN NL323Fs unlike SBST who mass ordered Citaros.... another generation of underpowered buses for SBST then
If a KUB and a citaro on service 53 bunchup, I would rather go for the KUB.