Originally posted by SBS 9631X:There is now? I thought all along don't have or did I miss it out
there is. it's just displayed in the multifunction display instead of the warning indicator column.
Originally posted by Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1):
to Merczrox : We need to do a DNA test , as it say we are bros.
Wad a Nice Assumption from it
For what fuck must we do sia for that bloody bastard??See my previous post..Haha!!That bloody bastard will make assumptions suka suka and we must listen to that??Haha dont even know how to make dont make la..Still want to come here and talk cock and act big fuck.His assumptions is like his fucking bitch face sia .Still can ask us not to make assumptions..HAHA what great logic!!
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:I'm not trying to shoot you down & I have no intention to (I'm going to try to put it to you in a nicer manner than 'SBS6078M' in case you shoot him too), but the reason why 36 is making do with its fleet of KUBs (majority Euro Vs somemore) is because the crowds along certain sectors of its route is really really heavy. The Suntec-Orchard area is one, the Marine Parade that area also.
If 36 gets Citaros, yes it will be faster and less lethargic on the expressway stretches. But the time made up on the expressway sectors would be lost once you hit those bus stops with such heavy pax traffic. The KUBs are just faster in loading everyone onboard to be honest due to its wider aisle and larger standing area below the steps.
The higher roof of the KUBs also makes it easier for the BC to see if there's any alighting pax who is trying to get out but stuck in the bus. I've encountered many BCs driving the Citaros which are packed who either: 1) Missed the stop where pax already pressed the bell long ago (no 'Stopping' warning light on dashboard for Citaros, KUBs have), or 2) stuck at the bus stop for twice the time needed in a KUB because everyone's head is blocking the BC's view of seeing who exactly haven't alighted. And yes, that is with CCTVs fitted at the same positions as the KUBs on the Citaros.
And if I'm not wrong (I'm not too sure about this), but the KUBs are more suitable for 36 too because 36's rest time at CGA (that is its only terminating point) is slightly shorter than the other airport services with Citaros (24 at AMK, 53 at Bishan). Not to mention the jumpbus system of 36, the BC of the previous 36 bus usually jumps straight onto the next 36 bus that arrives around 5-10mins later to take over & drive straight away, rest for the BC yes but no rest for the bus practically. You probably won't feel it from inside or outside the buses accurately, but the Citaros actually run hotter than the KUBs. That's why if you put Citaros on 36, they might tend to overheat faster?
I also feel that 36 should stay with their K230UB perms.
Originally posted by Lsk138:SBS 6180A ON SV 109 TODAY ! (BN or HG ?)
Most likely most of the Citaros that appeared on 109 were HGDEP.
Originally posted by SBS 6078 M:To SMB228X:Indeed,the person who ordered scanians must really wake up and go have a brain operation.Not to mention,80% of scania k230ubs jerk like hell and makes me vomit,especially tis k230ubs:8361G(AMDEP 24)8454Y(AMDEP 24) 8657D(AMDEP53) 8293U(SLBP52) 8182G(AMDEP 130) 8537S(AMDEP 410W) 8538P(AMDEP 410W)
why u so weak? jerk a bit will make u vomit? are u a sissy or faggot?
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:I'm not trying to shoot you down & I have no intention to (I'm going to try to put it to you in a nicer manner than 'SBS6078M' in case you shoot him too), but the reason why 36 is making do with its fleet of KUBs (majority Euro Vs somemore) is because the crowds along certain sectors of its route is really really heavy. The Suntec-Orchard area is one, the Marine Parade that area also.
If 36 gets Citaros, yes it will be faster and less lethargic on the expressway stretches. But the time made up on the expressway sectors would be lost once you hit those bus stops with such heavy pax traffic. The KUBs are just faster in loading everyone onboard to be honest due to its wider aisle and larger standing area below the steps.
The higher roof of the KUBs also makes it easier for the BC to see if there's any alighting pax who is trying to get out but stuck in the bus. I've encountered many BCs driving the Citaros which are packed who either: 1) Missed the stop where pax already pressed the bell long ago (no 'Stopping' warning light on dashboard for Citaros, KUBs have), or 2) stuck at the bus stop for twice the time needed in a KUB because everyone's head is blocking the BC's view of seeing who exactly haven't alighted. And yes, that is with CCTVs fitted at the same positions as the KUBs on the Citaros.
And if I'm not wrong (I'm not too sure about this), but the KUBs are more suitable for 36 too because 36's rest time at CGA (that is its only terminating point) is slightly shorter than the other airport services with Citaros (24 at AMK, 53 at Bishan). Not to mention the jumpbus system of 36, the BC of the previous 36 bus usually jumps straight onto the next 36 bus that arrives around 5-10mins later to take over & drive straight away, rest for the BC yes but no rest for the bus practically. You probably won't feel it from inside or outside the buses accurately, but the Citaros actually run hotter than the KUBs. That's why if you put Citaros on 36, they might tend to overheat faster?
Ok, maybe you have your points.
But in the past, B10Ms are able to deal with the crowds as well.
Maybe 39 should get some Citaros then. ![]()
Originally posted by SBS 1000U:Ok, maybe you have your points.
But in the past, B10Ms are able to deal with the crowds as well.
Maybe 39 should get some Citaros then.
True in a certain sense that the Mk4s on 36 previously managed the jobs well. But idk, probably the population back then wasn't that much compared to now? Or maybe less people thronged the Suntec-Orchard area ![]()
If 39 gets Citaros, it would be an interesting case. Now the BCs are all purposely trying to slow down alot on TPE/SLE stretch to avoid being too early for the stops after the expressway sector, if it does get Citaros, hmm let's see if the BCs can't resist the urge to floor or not. ![]()
Originally posted by SBS 1000U:Ok, maybe you have your points.
But in the past, B10Ms are able to deal with the crowds as well.
Maybe 39 should get some Citaros then.
You think public buses like SBST and SMRT suka suka can buy used buses ah?
Originally posted by sbst191:
how bout svc 36 get K270?? maybe xovers from Budget Terminal Shuttle?? cause budget terminal closing soon =D
LTA has banned the purchase of second-hand buses.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:LTA has banned the purchase of second-hand buses.
Second-hand buses as in which context? Public operator to private operator or private-operator to private operator also affected? ![]()
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:Second-hand buses as in which context? Public operator to private operator or private-operator to private operator also affected?
SBS and SMRT can only buy brand new buses.
Originally posted by SMB228X:SBS and SMRT can only buy brand new buses.
I rather hear from Gus.chong or someone else on this issue so that the info is more reliable.
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:I didn't say they are going faster in that context of top speed. If you got lost in what I posted, I was talking about the faster acceleration of Citaros to reach the max 60kmh they can do. Duh, I also know both are limited to 60kmh, not like the SMRT ones.
Oh I see! Didn't see that part earlier. Thanks!
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:True in a certain sense that the Mk4s on 36 previously managed the jobs well. But idk, probably the population back then wasn't that much compared to now? Or maybe less people thronged the Suntec-Orchard area
If 39 gets Citaros, it would be an interesting case. Now the BCs are all purposely trying to slow down alot on TPE/SLE stretch to avoid being too early for the stops after the expressway sector, if it does get Citaros, hmm let's see if the BCs can't resist the urge to floor or not.
Well, it come true.
Spotted Citaro on 39 just now.
SBS6163A. ![]()
Originally posted by SBS 1000U:
Well, it come true.Spotted Citaro on 39 just now.
SBS6163A.
Too bad nahs dude, that guy already perm 28. If its one of the SP Citaros, hmm..but 771J is still living. ![]()
saw a citaro on 82 today. first time seeing a citaro on 82. has citaros did 82 before?
Originally posted by sexy girls:saw a citaro on 82 today. first time seeing a citaro on 82. has citaros did 82 before?
No.
Saw a Citaro on 27 yesterday.Was it the 1st time??
Originally posted by Gus.chong:No.
YEP! I SAW IT TODAY!
DEBUT ! : SBS6137B ON 82! [ HGDEP SP ]
I was like shocked to see like ' WOW CITARO ON 62?!?!?!'
Then I cleaned my specs to see that is is 82.
Then I was like : 'WTF?!?!?!?!?!?!'
This came to my mind : SERANGOON INT ILL-TREATED 82 BUT PUNGGOL INT TREATED 82 LIKE A BOSS!
Originally posted by Merczrox:Saw a Citaro on 27 yesterday.Was it the 1st time??
It is pretty common right now.
Most of it is either from the services on Hougang Int or SP buses.
Originally posted by Merczrox:Saw a Citaro on 27 yesterday.Was it the 1st time??
And, no. The 1st time it is like when SBS6087L is registered into HGDEP.
Originally posted by Merczrox:Saw a Citaro on 27 yesterday.Was it the 1st time??
It is damn common now. Every week will at least hv 1
Damn lah if 36 hv citaros i will tear down SBS.
Originally posted by SMB128B:It is damn common now. Every week will at least hv 1
More like 1 day got 1 XD