Redeployments (Part 15)

• TIB433S

  30 May 12, 22:12

  Originally posted by TIB 585L:

  Its jumping svc?

  Probably.. I suspect it's because of the new Harry Potter ad.

• TIB 585L

  30 May 12, 22:13

  Originally posted by TIB433S:

  Probably.. I suspect it's because of the new Harry Potter ad.

  Ok the Harry Potter ad is full or back ad?

• SMB66X

  30 May 12, 22:21

  Originally posted by TIB 585L:

  Ok the Harry Potter ad is full or back ad?

  Full.

• SBS 9631X

  30 May 12, 23:40

  Originally posted by Rui jing:

  2833B is on sv197 today. It has an ad so does it belong to sv37 still?

  That NETS ad appeared on 2833B in end-April before the timetable change for Sv 37 just 2 weeks or so back in May. So unless the advertiser allows for the change of ad contract from Sv 37 to some other service, that ad contract is likely for Sv 37.  But seems to be running around as spare nowadays though. I don't know what they are doing with that bus. 

• SBS 9631X

  30 May 12, 23:45

  Originally posted by SMB66X:

  SBS3060H 
  (HG SP)  (HG 109)

  Should be perm alr..with another wright.

  Perm HG 109 together with 3082U (unless they decide to switch again, which I doubt so according to rego sequence). Both on S shift duty from what I can tell (appeared on both AM & PM Peak then MIA in between during off-peak), to cater to the peak-hour crowd at Loyang Industrial Estate.

  Buses out to be confirmed again. Definitely not one of the Citaros (all are spotted with perm stix still) or the Euro V KUBs (ad contracts). Should be 2 of the Mk4s that is out, but idk why 984L is still on Sv109 when that should be the first to go. 2658R still MIA.

• SBS2656X

  31 May 12, 08:04

  Originally posted by SBS 9631X:

  Perm HG 109 together with 3082U (unless they decide to switch again, which I doubt so according to rego sequence). Both on S shift duty from what I can tell (appeared on both AM & PM Peak then MIA in between during off-peak), to cater to the peak-hour crowd at Loyang Industrial Estate.

  Buses out to be confirmed again. Definitely not one of the Citaros (all are spotted with perm stix still) or the Euro V KUBs (ad contracts). Should be 2 of the Mk4s that is out, but idk why 984L is still on Sv109 when that should be the first to go. 2658R still MIA.

  Both wrights are perms already . Same case as 43.
  SBS984L spotted with 109 perm stix. 
  Since 109 got a new timetable already, 109 is most probably to have fleet addition during peak hours 

• SBS 9631X

  31 May 12, 11:10

  Originally posted by SBS2656X:

  Both wrights are perms already . Same case as 43.
  SBS984L spotted with 109 perm stix. 
  Since 109 got a new timetable already, 109 is most probably to have fleet addition during peak hours 

  WOW WOW WOW.  Right after I posted both wrights are perm 109 before your post, now you tell me they are perm. Quite Captain Obvious right you, dumb.

  And what bullshit. 109's fleet frequency is unchanged during peak hours from what I can tell. So at most they would have added only 1 fleet add, not 2. What kind of deduction is that from you that they changed timetable, they must have added 2 fleet add? You didn't even compare the new and old frequency beforehand. Besides, the new timetable is to reflect the change of 6176M's previous ASD block to WSD as well. Not merely for the Wrights.

  Next time don't anyhow touch the wiki pages unless you have evidence, especially for Sv 109. It irks me alot to have to revert your bullshit edits on Wiki. 

• SBS2656X

  31 May 12, 11:11

  Is it seriously true that SBS3814A [ O405 CAC ] actually permed 325 before?!?!?!!?

• SBS2656X

  31 May 12, 11:12

  Originally posted by SBS 9631X:

  WOW WOW WOW.  Right after I posted both wrights are perm 109 before your post, now you tell me they are perm. Quite Captain Obvious right you, dumb.

  And what bullshit. 109's fleet frequency is unchanged during peak hours from what I can tell. So at most they would have added only 1 fleet add, not 2. What kind of deduction is that from you that they changed timetable, they must have added 2 fleet add? You didn't even compare the new and old frequency beforehand. Besides, the new timetable is to reflect the change of 6176M's previous ASD block to WSD as well. Not merely for the Wrights.

  Next time don't anyhow touch the wiki pages unless you have evidence, especially for Sv 109. It irks me alot to have to revert your bullshit edits on Wiki. 

  I did not refresh my page to see your post 

• SBS2656X

  31 May 12, 11:18

  Btw why are the 2 wrights operating only in prek hour shifts -_-
  If it is replacing the strider, it would have operated full day...
  Just does not make sense 

• SMB128B

  31 May 12, 13:45

  Originally posted by SBS2656X:

  Btw why are the 2 wrights operating only in prek hour shifts -_-
  If it is replacing the strider, it would have operated full day...
  Just does not make sense 

  Just to ask: How often do you take 109 boy?

• SBS 9631X

  31 May 12, 17:40

  Originally posted by SBS2656X:

  Is it seriously true that SBS3814A [ O405 CAC ] actually permed 325 before?!?!?!!?

  Nice changing of subject there instead of apologising for your blatant idiotness. Good try, but fail. Post under the wrong topic somemore. 

• SBS 9631X

  31 May 12, 17:40

  Originally posted by SMB128B:

  Just to ask: How often do you take 109 boy?

  Does he even take 109 at all? I thought all he took the whole day was only his pet favourites Sv 43 & 325. LOL.

• SBS 9631X

  31 May 12, 17:46

  Originally posted by SBS2656X:

  I did not refresh my page to see your post 

  Right. My post was at 11.45pm last night about the two Wrights being perm, your post on the same two Wrights was at 8.04am today. You think everyone here is blind like you? And please, use your brains, don't crap an excuse say that what you fell asleep while you typed that post. That's plain stupid and impossible.  
  Furthermore, if you viewed this topic in the morning, there is no way that my post hadn't appeared by the time you replied. So stop trying to find a way of this situation by constantly trying to crap reasons to save your ass. Many of us are sick and tired of that.

• TIB1173K

  31 May 12, 17:50

  SBS3082U

  (HGDEP SP)  (HGDEP 109)

  Funny thing: SGWiki stated SBS2082U 

• SBS6234D

  31 May 12, 18:07

  Originally posted by TIB1173K:

  SBS3082U

  (HGDEP SP)  (HGDEP 109)

  Funny thing: SGWiki stated SBS2082U 

  the 2 is just beside 3 so it's a typo error perhaps due to fastest fingers 1st. 

• TIB1173K

  31 May 12, 18:13

  Originally posted by SBS6234D:

  the 2 is just beside 3 so it's a typo error perhaps due to fastest fingers 1st. 

  
  Yes i agree. Typo error. lol
• TIB433S

  31 May 12, 20:34

  SMB111Z
  (KJDEP 67   KJDEP/BBDEP 77) 
  
  SMB254U
  (WLDEP 187  WLDEP/BPDEP 75) 

• Gus.chong

  31 May 12, 20:38

  Originally posted by SBS 9631X:

  Nice changing of subject there instead of apologising for your blatant idiotness. Good try, but fail. Post under the wrong topic somemore. 

  He should post at this topic I created:

  http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/424926

• SMB189A

  31 May 12, 20:48

  FROM SgWiki SMB130T SMB131R SMB13M perm on 980??
• TIB 585L

  31 May 12, 20:49

  Originally posted by SMB189A:

  FROM SgWiki
  SMB130T SMB131R SMB13M perm on 980??

  Huh? So fast ah they perm? I saw 130T on 169 during peak hour today.

   

• Gus.chong

  31 May 12, 20:52

  Originally posted by SMB189A:

  FROM SgWiki
  SMB130T SMB131R SMB13M perm on 980??

  The third rego in your post should be SMB132M.

• SMB189A

  31 May 12, 20:53

  Originally posted by TIB 585L:

  Huh? So fast ah they perm? I saw 130T on 169 during peak hour today.

   

  
  Was checking the list on bus suddenly saw this 3 buses Perm
• TIB 585L

  31 May 12, 20:56

  Originally posted by SMB189A:

  
  Was checking the list on bus suddenly saw this 3 buses Perm

  Unbelievable. Someone got to check at SBW int if they saw them

• SMB189A

  31 May 12, 21:00

  Originally posted by TIB 585L:

  Unbelievable. Someone got to check at SBW int if they saw them

  
  Oceane edited that TIB780P N TIB781L are out of 969