927 2 buses only?Sure boh?Smrt commit suicide is it?
1081S probably replace 1134Z.Seen this bus running around to svc like 67,854 and Yushun feeders
Originally posted by carbikebus:927 2 buses only?Sure boh?Smrt commit suicide is it?
1081S probably replace 1134Z.Seen this bus running around to svc like 67,854 and Yushun feeders
In effect for some time..
SMB150K SMB156U
(AMDEP SP > AMDEP/SEDEP 167)
SMB60L
(AMDEP/SEDEP 167 > AMDEP SP)
SMB46D SMB47B TIB798P still 851 buses..
TIB740E is perm 927
Originally posted by TIB433S:
And 1134Z was that bus which was the additional 169 perm during the diversion.. hanks for clarifying that it's not a 169 bus now. :)
Amdep they need at least 3 SP bendy..Btw bro 927 got 3 buses ie 2 starters and 1 S1 on weekdays and 2 starters and 1 TQ on weekends.SMB60L should sent to WLDEP and converted to JB spec to act as an SP for 950.Those OCs from RWS8 can exchange for Citaros
This one is confirmed, by perm sticker observation and did ask BC .
SBS9170J
BRBP SP
BRBP 90
SBS8782A
BRBP 90
BRBP SP
Aiyo should deploy B10TLs instead of LOs
Originally posted by SBS494J:This one is confirmed, by perm sticker observation and did ask BC .
SBS9170J
BRBP SP
BRBP 90
SBS8782A
BRBP 90
BRBP SP
Originally posted by carbikebus:Amdep they need at least 3 SP bendy..Btw bro 927 got 3 buses ie 2 starters and 1 S1 on weekdays and 2 starters and 1 TQ on weekends.SMB60L should sent to WLDEP and converted to JB spec to act as an SP for 950.Those OCs from RWS8 can exchange for Citaros
Actually, IMO, they should just use the Hinos for 927 like they did in te past.. And for 60L, why not just throw back to 858? The OCs from RWS8 should be given to WLDEP as well, either for 858 or 950, and the WLDEP new MAN can go KJDEP instead. Hence, AMDEP RWS8 and RWS8S (RWS8 STAFF) can use the spare O405s and Lances as perms. My thoughts.
TIB445H
(WLDEP SP > WLDEP/BPDEP 75)
Long time back on 75. Around 2-3 weeks already.. Suspect it's because of the I Can Read! ad.
From sgwiki
SBS9642P + 2 unknown LO
(AMDEP 166 > AMDEP SP)
SBS3117D SBS3123K SBS3137X
(AMDEP SP > AMDEP 166)
Originally posted by TIB433S:TIB445H
(WLDEP SP > WLDEP/BPDEP 75)
Long time back on 75. Around 2-3 weeks already.. Suspect it's because of the I Can Read! ad.
I don't think it was the 'I can read' ad but just on a random basis.
Originally posted by TIB433S:Actually, IMO, they should just use the Hinos for 927 like they did in te past.. And for 60L, why not just throw back to 858? The OCs from RWS8 should be given to WLDEP as well, either for 858 or 950, and the WLDEP new MAN can go KJDEP instead. Hence, AMDEP RWS8 and RWS8S (RWS8 STAFF) can use the spare O405s and Lances as perms. My thoughts.
RWS8 can use normal buses alright, But as a tourist would you mind taking these hot and dirty buses to RWS?
I certainly won't mind, But it's the impression that counts.
Originally posted by TIB783G:RWS8 can use normal buses alright, But as a tourist would you mind taking these hot and dirty buses to RWS?
I certainly won't mind, But it's the impression that counts.
Tourist don't even give a damn, as long there's bus to take, to save their energy, they don't really care about others..
RWS8 can do with 5 Citaros and 6 refurbish O405s
Originally posted by TIB433S:Actually, IMO, they should just use the Hinos for 927 like they did in te past.. And for 60L, why not just throw back to 858? The OCs from RWS8 should be given to WLDEP as well, either for 858 or 950, and the WLDEP new MAN can go KJDEP instead. Hence, AMDEP RWS8 and RWS8S (RWS8 STAFF) can use the spare O405s and Lances as perms. My thoughts.
The RWS8 OCs can deploy some for 187,858,950
From SGWIki
TIB1241Y
(AMDEP SP/599* >> AMDEP 167/599*)
Originally posted by SMB189A:From SGWIki
TIB1241Y
(AMDEP SP/599* >> AMDEP 167/599*)
Must be crapping clones that edit that
Originally posted by SBS8730A:From sgwiki
SBS9642P + 2 unknown LO
(AMDEP 166 > AMDEP SP)SBS3117D SBS3123K SBS3137X
(AMDEP SP > AMDEP 166)
9033+9153....
Originally posted by SMB189A:From SGWIki
TIB1241Y
(AMDEP SP/599* >> AMDEP 167/599*)
When you see this, it's obviously some kiddo who thinks it's funny to edit this. 167 has had no history of a permanent bendy deployment before.. So next time if you see such a strange edit, change it back to the former deployment. Thanks..
Can someone verify is 6196E is indeed perm HG 151 and 6225E 6226S 6227A are perm HG 27? I just came across these on wiki, and that one who edited it didn't take out what bus are out from 151 or 27.
There's this disturbing trend of some people editing on wiki and putting in buses into services when they can't find what buses are out. ![]()
Originally posted by lemon1974:9033+9153....
Hmm, but any idea why is 9642P out instead of the older 9425A? Mileage or because 9642P caught fire before on 166?
The LO3xs i can understand cause they are the oldest buses from AM side for 166, but 9642P? Just wondering. ![]()
Originally posted by TIB433S:When you see this, it's obviously some kiddo who thinks it's funny to edit this. 167 has had no history of a permanent bendy deployment before.. So next time if you see such a strange edit, change it back to the former deployment. Thanks..
Ya lor misleading ppl only those clowns.If AMDEP really need at least a perm bendy then 171 is the candidate
ya ! and this perm citaros from 151 almost everday like to cameo on 101 and 109 then it own perm svc !
172 deployments:
SMB 5Y
SMB 6U
SMB 57Y
SMB 58U
SMB 59S
SMB 103Y
SMB 105S
SMB 125J
TIB 714G
TIB 886T
TIB 1030P
TIB 1050G
TIB 1085G