178 to Yishun too hectic Liao bro.Might as well extend 171 to Sembawang
Good idea too, then whole route won't look so ''stupid''.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:That is good at least the 857 SLs can rest than looping at Suntec.
Actually, It is the AM ones that will call quits at suntec, the WLDEP ones will rest.
Provided they don't mess around with the fleets which I do not think they will.
Erm before I forget, SBS3338H is AP shift Sv76, not S shift.
Btw, ytd alot of BSEP buses on their respective perms and usual slot.
Eg are Sv13, 76, 410, 53.
262 also have 8820Z covering the BSEP slot.
It is ridiculous SMRT keep on putting one bus each mth on sv like 106, 190 or 960 and call that enhancement!
Originally posted by phillipC:It is ridiculous SMRT keep on putting one bus each mth on sv like 106, 190 or 960 and call that enhancement!
They need to register some A24s as BSEP...
Originally posted by SBS2656X:They need to register some A24s as BSEP...
So far only got 1 A24s, and I don't think they have finished a 2nd unit, or rather order more A24s. So where's those A24s that's going to be part of BSEP?
I think 87 got one more BSEP addition.SBS 3310L has been doing 87 lately and did not do 119 lately.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:I think 87 got one more BSEP addition.SBS 3310L has been doing 87 lately and did not do 119 lately.
Not only 87, this dude also like to cameo on 50.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:I think 87 got one more BSEP addition.SBS 3310L has been doing 87 lately and did not do 119 lately.
It could be replacing the Citaro on 87. In Oct last year, BSEP didn't register wrights and deployed Citaros on all heavy loading services like 2. 60. 87. 168. Now they have realized their mistake, and correcting it. So possible to replace the Citaro.
From someone
3053M - 913
3058A - 963
Bus should be perming 951E/913
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:It could be replacing the Citaro on 87. In Oct last year, BSEP didn't register wrights and deployed Citaros on all heavy loading services like 2. 60. 87. 168. Now they have realized their mistake, and correcting it. So possible to replace the Citaro.
You're wrong bro. They did register SBS3307 and SBS3310 for sv119
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:It could be replacing the Citaro on 87. In Oct last year, BSEP didn't register wrights and deployed Citaros on all heavy loading services like 2. 60. 87. 168. Now they have realized their mistake, and correcting it. So possible to replace the Citaro.
Today saw two BSEP buses on service 87.They are SBS 6350B which could be replacing SBS 6350B and SSB 3310L.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:Today saw two BSEP buses on service 87.They are SBS 6350B which could be replacing SBS 6350B and SSB 3310L.
Huh? SBS6350B replace itself and SBS3310L?
Originally posted by SBS 6078 M:Huh? SBS6350B replace itself and SBS3310L?
What I meant was SBS 6350B could be replacing SBS 6306E while SBS 3310L is an another BSEP bus that did 87 and not replacing SBS 6306E
Originally posted by SMB66X:From someone
3053M - 913
3058A - 963Bus should be perming 951E/913
SMB3052R spotted Off Svc at 5.20pm. Suspect heading twds Shenton Way. Most likely doing supplementary svc on unknown svc bfore that. SMB3053M confirmed on 913 just now
Suspect 966 got BSEP add under 966S193, SMB3043S spotted just now on 966 at 5.25pm
SMB3056E on 901 replacing SMB3043S.
SBS3354K spotted again on 168 today.
First spotting on 168 leaving WRI at 2.30pm last Monday
Second spotting on 168 twds WRI at 1.20pm opp IKEA last Wednesday
Third spotting on 168 at around 5.40pm entering WRI today
Full day BSEP add for 168?
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:What I meant was SBS 6350B could be replacing SBS 6306E while SBS 3310L is an another BSEP bus that did 87 and not replacing SBS 6306E
You should've phrased it properly
Originally posted by TIB 585L:SMB3052R spotted Off Svc at 5.20pm. Suspect heading twds Shenton Way. Most likely doing supplementary svc on unknown svc bfore that. SMB3053M confirmed on 913 just now
Suspect 966 got BSEP add under 966S193, SMB3043S spotted just now on 966 at 5.25pm
SMB3056E on 901 replacing SMB3043S.
3052R should be crossing over from a WAB svc since the bus have WAB decal for both trips(unless driver forgotten to remove)
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:Today saw two BSEP buses on service 87.They are SBS 6350B which could be replacing SBS 6350B and SSB 3310L.
sometime there will be also 2 BSEP buses on 87 like 3329J also seen doing a few time on this svc already together with the perm citaro @ dat time.
Originally posted by SMB66X:3052R should be crossing over from a WAB svc since the bus have WAB decal for both trips(unless driver forgotten to remove)
There isnt much to go on from there since WRI have few WAB service though. Shall see tmr what service it does supplementary trips on, Suspect it is a feeder but cant be sure
Originally posted by TIB 585L:There isnt much to go on from there since WRI have few WAB service though. Shall see tmr what service it does supplementary trips on, Suspect it is a feeder but cant be sure
920/922/859 or even 858
Originally posted by SMB66X:920/922/859 or even 858
Shall check tmr since i saw it on WRI so 920/922 may not be an option.