Originally posted by TIB783G:Ever since the 961 volgrens were 'demoted' to JB svcs everything is a mess up.
961 WL fleet is quite unstable. Only saw 520Z,294D,295B,296Z,298T,290P on 961 perm. I am aware that there are missing bus on 961
961 WL side I notice 2 buses always missing where Amdep 1 duty like kapo ardy.
Originally posted by carbikebus:961 WL side I notice 2 buses always missing where Amdep 1 duty like kapo ardy.
WL should be the 2 Citaros. AM side wich one? I observe everytime all is on 961 including the Lance 932T
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:To users 'SBS6305H', 'SBS8501U', SBS6301T' & 'SBS 6078 M', 8164J still has its Sv 53 perm stix on its coinbox. Just checked again a few hours ago on 8164J. The perm stix is still there, and evidently not cancelled out in any manner.
So no idea what one of you guys (I don't have to say who) was looking at when you said that time that the stix was cancelled.
8538P's still on Sv 53 though. I can only confirm that AFAIK the permers are still on with none MIA for more than a few days, so it's not a fleet replacement. Which means its either:
1) A fleet add (there was a recent e-tt change a month ago I think) that it didn't have a perm stix yet for 53 because it just went in recently but the previous 410 perm stix was removed (since it left 410). (eg. 8292Y still doesn't have a perm stix for 21 yet btw after perming 21 for months to replace crashed & MIA 8470A)
2) just a replacement for any sv 53 permer on cameo or in workshop.The freq didn't have much improvement though during Peak, so I'm thinking it's the latter as a more probable choice.
SBS8483M is back on 410G today. But SBS8778M is on SBS8538P shift. Dont think 410 still have a definite perm yet.
Is SBS3163U perm 8 as stated on sgwiki? there is no perm stix at all in the bus unlike those perm 88/157 ones. Also she has been on 88 quite often all along. Should still be SP.
Originally posted by SBS6305H:I did not board 8164J for donkey years already. Only spot it doing 53. Further more I did not say that the perm stick was cancelled.
Chill dude. I wasn't referring to you. There was also one of you guys out of the 4 users I mentioned that had posted about 8164J going to SP because its "perm stix was cancelled." I know you didn't post something like that, so don't worry. ![]()
I just said one of you guys but didn't mention who is the person (even though I clearly remembered who the person is) because I didn't want to embarrass him directly. But his username is "6_ _ _ M", if that makes you more at ease. ![]()
SMB138Y
(AM 985
Non user Lay-up Status until 1 Nov 2013; Former AMDEP 985)
Originally posted by TIB770T:SMB138Y
(AM 985
Non user Lay-up Status until 1 Nov 2013; Former AMDEP 985)
What happened?
Originally posted by SMB195G:What happened?
Not sure, but someone spotted the bus without revenue service equipment.
Originally posted by TIB770T:Not sure, but someone spotted the bus without revenue service equipment.
Converting to TRG?
Originally posted by TIB 585L:Converting to TRG?
Originally posted by TIB770T:SMB138Y
(AM 985
Non user Lay-up Status until 1 Nov 2013; Former AMDEP 985)
The lay up expiry date should be 10 November 2013, not 1 November 2013.
Originally posted by SMB189A:Anyone confirm if 171 ONP at YI int or SE int??
why would 171 ONP is sembawang int...
Originally posted by SMB189A:Anyone confirm if 171 ONP at YI int or SE int??
SEBP
Originally posted by TIB770T:Not sure, but someone spotted the bus without revenue service equipment.
dont know but i suspect that it might be rebodied? to gemilang or what ![]()
Originally posted by TIB770T:Not sure, but someone spotted the bus without revenue service equipment.
Could it have been like the trial of the demonstrator has ended?
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Could it have been like the trial of the demonstrator has ended?
I hope not ![]()
Originally posted by dan474:why would 171 ONP is sembawang int...
Originally posted by SMB189A:
I saw 171 bus at SE int.
171 buses do overnight parking at SE Int.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Could it have been like the trial of the demonstrator has ended?
Originally posted by TIB770T:Not sure, but someone spotted the bus without revenue service equipment.
Skali the bus changing its equipment![]()
Originally posted by SMB189A:
Most probably, after the lay up finished, it Deregistered.
SMB137A is still not de-registered as of now...most probably they will keep extending the lay-up until it was sold.
Originally posted by SBS6305H:but 8642 has been gone for more than a week.
8642X is still on sv36, tt is confirmed, it is still on its scheduled slot...
For 8630E, even with ad, i have yet to see it on weekday or weekend, peak/off peak...