Suspected Redeployments (Part 3)
-
Originally posted by TIB783G:
TIB486P
WL SP
WL SP/911Seen it on weekends without fail, for quite some time. Does this bus has any business on 911 weekdays?
TIB815Z
WLD 911E/169A WLD 911E/169A/169Replacing 473B since overnight parking ceased for both 965 and 169?
486P- Was replacing 122S slot wich AP01. Weekdays last week was nvr on 911/911E. 487L and 745S also on 911 last weekend and the Good Friday weekend. S101 and S102 buses become TQ01 and TQ02 on weekends 911S150 go to 911AP04 on weekends.
-
TIB761U (KJ SP > KJ 176)
-
Originally posted by SMB189A:
TIB761U
(KJ SP > KJ 176)Spotted with 985 desto inside. :(
-
Out of 179
SBS 9405H
SBS 9457H
179 replacementSBS 9281Y
SBS 9282U
SBS 9287G
SBS 9434Z -
Originally posted by chickenlittle2:
Out of 179
SBS 9405H
SBS 9457H
179 replacementSBS 9281Y
SBS 9282U
SBS 9287G
SBS 9434Z179 VO3x batch 1 and 2 deployments are always messy with no perm except the batch 1 and 2 that were perm before 2009.
9506A and 9567Y were at one time on the service for nearly 2 months and were discovered to be non-perm.
Similarly, 9406E was on the service for a consistently for a long period of time, but a new 'SP' marking was recently spotted on the coinbox so 9406E is now SP.
Someone edited 9405H and 9443Y to be perm, but these buses were never perm. Same case for 9391M (who edited that in last time!?!) and 9230U.
Recently, I spotted 9410S, 9434Z and 9513D to be running consistently. But I doubt these buses are perm.
This service seems to have disappearing buses every day and some long term disappearances. 9670H is currently nowhere to be found. And at least 5 to 7 slots are permanently filled up by rotating SP buses (always the newly transferred batch 1 and 2 from HGDEP or BBDEP).
So yea, none of them are perm. These slots will surely be taken over by another batch of short term buses in the near future. One thing that puzzles me is why SLBP still doesn't want to put perm Wrights on 179.
-
TIB1153T (KJ SP > KJ 180)
-
At this rate dun tell me Kjdep don't have any spare bendies?
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
At this rate dun tell me Kjdep don't have any spare bendies?
If KJDEP wants WLDEP got alot of SP bendies to take unless they want wait SMB388S to come
-
But seriously Kjdep svc a lot of it require bendy buses.
-
Originally posted by @:)@:
179 VO3x batch 1 and 2 deployments are always messy with no perm except the batch 1 and 2 that were perm before 2009.
9506A and 9567Y were at one time on the service for nearly 2 months and were discovered to be non-perm.
Similarly, 9406E was on the service for a consistently for a long period of time, but a new 'SP' marking was recently spotted on the coinbox so 9406E is now SP.
Someone edited 9405H and 9443Y to be perm, but these buses were never perm. Same case for 9391M (who edited that in last time!?!) and 9230U.
Recently, I spotted 9410S, 9434Z and 9513D to be running consistently. But I doubt these buses are perm.
This service seems to have disappearing buses every day and some long term disappearances. 9670H is currently nowhere to be found. And at least 5 to 7 slots are permanently filled up by rotating SP buses (always the newly transferred batch 1 and 2 from HGDEP or BBDEP).
So yea, none of them are perm. These slots will surely be taken over by another batch of short term buses in the near future. One thing that puzzles me is why SLBP still doesn't want to put perm Wrights on 179.
Its a common sight for svc 179, 179 drivers or buses will fill up the empty of other services when needed.. So they kinda of act like standby drivers and spare buses..
There are alrdy wrights assigned to 179, but just not the time yet.
-
TIB491Z (WL SP > WL 961) - is 296Z on 961 recently?
-
Originally posted by SMB189A:
TIB491Z
(WL SP > WL 961) – is 296Z on 961 recently?Sunday on 950
-
Suspect 6639U perm 70 replace 8869J that went to BNDEP.
Also 2625K seems to be out from 70 already.
-
11 April 2013
SBS 3336M to perm 12?
SBS 5073H from AMDEP SP -> BNDEP SP because on 518 today.
SBS 3256K 58 to perm 58?
-
SBS9203Z
BB 74 > AR 65 -
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:
Suspect 6639U perm 70 replace 8869J that went to BNDEP.
Also 2625K seems to be out from 70 already.
6639 should be replacing 2625 instead.. while a DD (VO3x) might be replacing 8869.
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
6639 should be replacing 2625 instead.. while a DD (VO3x) might be replacing 8869.
2625 going to scrap soon ah? -
Originally posted by bus555:
SBS9203Z
BB 74 > AR 65
looks like temporarily replacing 3126 or 9335 which looks like MIA? -
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
Is SBS 9360C is out of 132?It`s been cameoing 74 ever since 132 become a wab service so I think probably it`s out from 132 and I think it is a SP bus.
any perm hgdep 74 buses missing recently? for me i think 9650 9659 -
Originally posted by SBS1929R:
11 April 2013
SBS 3336M to perm 12?
SBS 5073H from AMDEP SP -> BNDEP SP because on 518 today.
3336M not perm Sv 12 though. If you go and observe the timings it appears, it practically jumps timings every few days. It's more of like a SP Wright now that BNDEP deploys to replace any missing B9TLs from Sv 12 lately. I know it's reg-ed under BSEP scheme, but put inside depot also waste space, so might as well deploy out. Somemore BNDEP lost a whole chunk of its SP VO3x fleet to AMDEP and got a whole bunch of KUBs in return. So for svcs like Sv 12 that practically has priority in deploying SP DDs rather than SP SDs to cover the existing MIA DD permers, the SP Wrights or whatever BNDEP has in its SP DD fleet, the starter will deploy out for Sv 12.
err. if you see 5073H on Sv 518, then it's confirmed redeployed isn't it? Unless you didn't see the whole rego clearly and are guessing..then that's another story.
-
Originally posted by bus555:
SBS9203Z
BB 74 > AR 65I do think 9203Z was BB SP all along. Probably covered some Sv 74 permer for a week or two only. And I'm not sure about AR 65 having any permers MIA. Because 9203Z seems to be jumping timings?
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
I do think 9203Z was BB SP all along. Probably covered some Sv 74 permer for a week or two only. And I'm not sure about AR 65 having any permers MIA. Because 9203Z seems to be jumping timings?
Yes it jumps timing one, ytd 1235 depart from tmi, tdy close to noon depart from tmi
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
3336M not perm Sv 12 though. If you go and observe the timings it appears, it practically jumps timings every few days. It's more of like a SP Wright now that BNDEP deploys to replace any missing B9TLs from Sv 12 lately. I know it's reg-ed under BSEP scheme, but put inside depot also waste space, so might as well deploy out. Somemore BNDEP lost a whole chunk of its SP VO3x fleet to AMDEP and got a whole bunch of KUBs in return. So for svcs like Sv 12 that practically has priority in deploying SP DDs rather than SP SDs to cover the existing MIA DD permers, the SP Wrights or whatever BNDEP has in its SP DD fleet, the starter will deploy out for Sv 12.
err. if you see 5073H on Sv 518, then it's confirmed redeployed isn't it? Unless you didn't see the whole rego clearly and are guessing..then that's another story.
Alright, for 3336M I will observe again.
For 5073H, its confirmed in BN. :)
-
Originally posted by SBS1929R:
Alright, for 3336M I will observe again.
For 5073H, its confirmed in BN. :)
3336M was on Sv 12 today again though. On A/P slot again, but timings tally that of 3131L's from what I can remember.
Actually very simple. If you see it in the middle of the day at 12 noon just starting a trip from PSR or NBR, or somewhere along the route, that's definitely not a S Shift slot for Sv 12, or BSEP slot even for that matter. Sv 12's S-shift buses come out around 2pm+ nearing 3pm like that onwards usually. Ditto for Sv 17.
-
Update: SBS8238E still with the 24 perm stix, after SBS6078M's slot. In fact, SBS6618E is replacing SBS6078M's slot. You guys know what I'm trying to get at.