Originally posted by SBS5111G:But 2 diff buses on the same perm service cannot use the same ad right? Coz 9479U (HG 74) got the same ad
So what? Same advert does not mean the bus cannot be perm.,look at the other services,some of their perm buses also have the same ad,so what?
Originally posted by SMB189A:TIB695C
(KJ SP > KJ 975)And to SBS9888Y in sgwiki, why do you banned me on sgwiki. Pls explained
You're SMB251C in SGWiki?
Though I'm not him(SBS9888Y), I must say, judging from MY OPINION. That user is really annoying for undo-ing several edits and making redundant spaces for advertisement in the wikitable on the MAN NL323F page and changed the year of manufacture for MAN NG363F twice. There are more annoying things that he has done.
And FYI, SBS9888Y is SBS7485P in SGF. You might want to ask him, though.
Originally posted by SBS6301T:saw 6078M at bishan int sometime this week...
Hmm? Doing familirasation? Or TRG. If it is TRG, did you see any L plate holders? AFAIK, this bus not on 24 after a few days SBS6618E kicked in as a perm.
Originally posted by SBS5111G:But 2 diff buses on the same perm service cannot use the same ad right? Coz 9479U (HG 74) got the same ad
Uh. Go and see the trend for the other buses with that same ad. If it's something like the Tiger Airways ad whereby each svc had 2-3 buses with the same Tiger Airways ad, then it's possible.
And if you think about it, 9479U is under HG. I don't see why they can't put another bus with the same ad if it's from BB. Sv 74 is a a route that though not crazily long, is always stuck in some jam along the route.. So high chance that even if both are perm, they're always on opposite directions = max exposure for the advertiser.
Originally posted by SBS 6078 M:Hmm? Doing familirasation? Or TRG. If it is TRG, did you see any L plate holders? AFAIK, this bus not on 24 after a few days SBS6618E kicked in as a perm.
As of today, SBS6078M is back on 24.
SBS 9204X to perm 291?
SBS 9355T and 9308E to perm 88?
Originally posted by SBS1929R:SBS 9204X to perm 291?
SBS 9355T and 9308E to perm 88?
dun anyhow whack please. 9204 replacing 7337 who is cameoing on 17 -.-
Originally posted by SMB189A:TIB775E
(AM SP > AM 67)
I though 775E has being a svc 67 all along?
Originally posted by bus555:I though 775E has being a svc 67 all along?
Is 775E even spare at the first place?
Originally posted by TownLink 291:dun anyhow whack please. 9204 replacing 7337 who is cameoing on 17 -.-
This already the 4th day spotting this. And like the thread is, suspected redeployments. Can possibly be wrong. Its just suspicions.
Originally posted by bus555:I though 775E has being a svc 67 all along?
SMB341B
[WL SP
WL 854].
Originally posted by SMB189A:TIB456B
(AM SP > AM 853)
today on 67..
Originally posted by SMB189A:TIB775E
(AM SP > AM 67)TIB761U
(WL/KJ SP > WL/KJ 176)
775E wasnt on 67 just now.
Originally posted by TIB1234T:SMB341B
[WL SPWL 854].
341B on 969 (321J slot)
SMB270Y
(WLDEP 960/965*) to (WLDEP 960)
775E do act as spare during weekends.Think one of the Amdep OAC is out
Originally posted by carbikebus:775E do act as spare during weekends.Think one of the Amdep OAC is out
In sgwiki now 1 extra in AM side for 67. I cant tell wich OAC is out coz when i saw 67 fleet just now. All i spotted was perms. Except for 518G wich occasionally cameos around but at times on 67
775E running on extra block mean no perm driver.Usually taken by standby drivers and if there're not enough standby drivers the bus won't do 67.The timing block is 6-13 mins in between front and back duty,Hope you understand and there's time when you notice 775E will arrive just 2-5 mins of the front bus.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:341B on 969 (321J slot)
Few times on 854 and 969 concurrently...
TIB775E on 851 tdy...
Originally posted by TIB1234T:Few times on 854 and 969 concurrently...
How about 981B and 1051D? Izit a co-incidence to spot them on 969 again doing perm service? 1051D did 969 twice on peak hour and once driven by perm SL.