Originally posted by carbikebus:962 justified for double deckers.Do not talk about A24 anymore.
Yes 962 should have got in some DDs instead of the A22 spamming, but what to do.. again DD shortage.
Originally posted by SMB3163D:Dunno what happen recently, but i don't see DDs running on 979, what happened to all the Enviros?? Or maybe they found DDs useless for 979 (no!)?
DDs on 979 are doing well.. infact need more... but goes back to the same problem.. SMRT does not have enough DDs... hence the A22 spa,mming.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:DDs on 979 are doing well.. infact need more... but goes back to the same problem.. SMRT does not have enough DDs... hence the A22 spa,mming.
Yup, I think 979 need some DDs to run at night too. 11pm also got packed bus. There was once SMB5901C ran on AP slot, i think it did well. I happened to board it at night and it managed to pick up all the pax at Bukit Panjang, with 10-15standing pax, fully seated..
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Yes 962 should have got in some DDs instead of the A22 spamming, but what to do.. again DD shortage.
Well if LTA supply them the A95s they should deploy 2 for 962.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Well if LTA supply them the A95s they should deploy 2 for 962.
The whole LTA/SMRT DD saga is going on for too long with no near term solution yet.
spotted time keeper at yishun station
likewise, at sembawang (bus stop: Blk 592A and Blk 590A)
are they adopting a wait and see now?
They are there so as to ensure that buses dont 'play' with their schedule
Originally posted by SMB145B:spotted time keeper at yishun station
likewise, at sembawang (bus stop: Blk 592A and Blk 590A)
are they adopting a wait and see now?
SBST also sends their white men out during peak hours, spotted one a few days back at junction of punggol rd outside North Vista Sec with a clipboard
timekeeper at YCK rd towards yishun direction for 857 was spotted smoking while on duty and was cursing at the bunching 857
Stringent law by LTA,Theyve been deducted more than rewards for BSRF.Anyway that timekeeper is outside from Interchange or depot,Nothing wrong for him to smoke as long he is not inside bus stop.
Originally posted by SMB3163D:Dunno what happen recently, but i don't see DDs running on 979, what happened to all the Enviros?? Or maybe they found DDs useless for 979 (no!)?
DDs back on running split shift today on 979, have no idea why there was no DD for that 2 days..
Originally posted by TIB 585L:They are there so as to ensure that buses dont 'play' with their schedule
oh yeah
if not sbst275 come to rant on the LTA fb page ...
Originally posted by Guides anyone?:SBST also sends their white men out during peak hours, spotted one a few days back at junction of punggol rd outside North Vista Sec with a clipboard
SMRT's staffs comes with the regular exercise book with timing for some buses.
This bunching problem runs deeper.
IMO its two fundamental issues:
1. Poor runtime planning, some overly long some overly tight.
2. Poor ability of BC to pace himself. Some F1, some like snail.
Both need each other to be fixed to reduce bunching.
As a footnote, no amount of monitoring, fines, rewards or surveying will solve this problem. Proper planning, training and subjecting both bus captains and runtime planners to being accountable for their poor performance, will.
Originally posted by TIB868X:This bunching problem runs deeper.
IMO its two fundamental issues:
1. Poor runtime planning, some overly long some overly tight.
2. Poor ability of BC to pace himself. Some F1, some like snail.
Both need each other to be fixed to reduce bunching.
As a footnote, no amount of monitoring, fines, rewards or surveying will solve this problem. Proper planning, training and subjecting both bus captains and runtime planners to being accountable for their poor performance, will.
Don't forget en-route conditions also...
Originally posted by SBS2656X:Don't forget en-route conditions also...
runtime should take into account expected and natural en-route conditions like peak hour congestion. if headways are damaged by unnatural incidents like accidents, then downroutes (starting from an appropriate bus stop) are likely needed.
Originally posted by TIB868X:runtime should take into account expected and natural en-route conditions like peak hour congestion. if headways are damaged by unnatural incidents like accidents, then downroutes (starting from an appropriate bus stop) are likely needed.
This is what the two new players trying to do with spreadover bus schedules.Again what ever in their country prove successful doesnt mean can apply the same thing here in SG with our selfish,egoistic road users and commuters.
Originally posted by carbikebus:This is what the two new players trying to do with spreadover bus schedules.Again what ever in their country prove successful doesnt mean can apply the same thing here in SG with our selfish,egoistic road users and commuters.
That's not to say London doesn't have its fair share of poor commuters or mega congestion, I hope their tactics do work
Originally posted by TIB868X:That's not to say London doesn't have its fair share of poor commuters or mega congestion, I hope their tactics do work
They can pull this off, but the locals won't like them.
Originally posted by sgbuses:They can pull this off, but the locals won't like them.
I'm afraid they will have to accept these measures as a trade off for higher service reliability and predictability in general. They can't have their cake and eat it too.
Originally posted by TIB868X:I'm afraid they will have to accept these measures as a trade off for higher service reliability and predictability in general. They can't have their cake and eat it too.
And to think that local operators start pointing finger that the foreign operators spoilt the market.What they didnt take note thing like bus shunters is appointed by LTA not GA nor TT.
Originally posted by carbikebus:And to think that local operators start pointing finger that the foreign operators spoilt the market.What they didnt take note thing like bus shunters is appointed by LTA not GA nor TT.
exactly why something like GCM might have been needed to give them a wake up call. its not spoling the market, its that they have been lacking in progress and commuters have suffered as a result. their executives in their cozy offices who drive to work every day are in no position to have a hand in day to day bus operations.
Originally posted by TIB868X:exactly why something like GCM might have been needed to give them a wake up call. its not spoling the market, its that they have been lacking in progress and commuters have suffered as a result. their executives in their cozy offices who drive to work every day are in no position to have a hand in day to day bus operations.
Haha and its ironic where GA appointed some office personnel to take the Class 4 course and Omnibus VL too.So not enough BCs those chaps all will come out drive half way ah?There is pros and cons too.I really pity those ex-SBST,SMRTB,SATS or Dnata bus drivers who only got 4A compared to those first batch class 3 which get their class 4 for free courtesy of the company.
Originally posted by TIB868X:I'm afraid they will have to accept these measures as a trade off for higher service reliability and predictability in general. They can't have their cake and eat it too.
I think service standards will drop after the initial fanfare. Perth's GCM model is designed mainly to cut cost.
If you provide no incentive in the contract to pick up passengers and penalize operators for being late, funny things will happen (as it did in Perth). It makes the former practice of "fan pai" look pale by comparison. PTA WA/Transperth took more than two decades to try and correct that problem and they still can't straighten things out because the contracts are for 10 years (i.e. breeds complacency).
But that's no longer my problem. Singaporeans get the government they deserve.
Originally posted by carbikebus:And to think that local operators start pointing finger that the foreign operators spoilt the market.What they didnt take note thing like bus shunters is appointed by LTA not GA nor TT.
I doubt there is that much differentation to begin with. Even GA uses the same "welcome to XX" EDS as TT on the recruitment buses, down to the same font and size.
Transperth has even made its bus operators standardize the EDS format. If Transperth is already doing that, then I am expecting the same level of micro-management to occur here. As such, any substantial initiative would have to come from LTA.