Originally posted by carbikebus:May not happen since it's already follow BCM.Other packages that BOL haven't expired will still practice dual control
So does that mean BM package services like 5 will be fully UPDEP when Pasir Ris int is like halfway across SG? At least 16 and 57 ain't so bad.. talk about dead mileage and wasted fuel sia...
Originally posted by Marvel68:So does that mean BM package services like 5 will be fully UPDEP when Pasir Ris int is like halfway across SG? At least 16 and 57 ain't so bad.. talk about dead mileage and wasted fuel sia...
Arbo den,Worse is 61,66 & 67.
If LTA allowed lease parking for 61,66 & 67 to park at Hgdep,Bndep & Lydep respectively then it's good
Originally posted by carbikebus:Arbo den,Worse is 61,66 & 67.
If LTA allowed lease parking for 61,66 & 67 to park at Hgdep,Bndep & Lydep respectively then it's good
This is possible as depots are also under LTA, is just whether LTA wants to or not.
Originally posted by SBS1Z:This is possible as depots are also under LTA, is just whether LTA wants to or not.
As I said before, even Transperth contractors practice dual depot control. I have seen buses from Southern River perform duties on Route 527 which belongs to Canning Contract based at Canning Vale depot.
Originally posted by carbikebus:They should introduce 275 back and withdrawn 131M.Svc 123 and 131 no need to enter Bt Purmei..Only 123M and 275 serve there.
When 605 was withdrawn, 275 should have been amended to Telok Blangah Way and converted to bi-directional. Use green and white plates like 225, 243, 382 and 410.
Spotted SBS9662G inside Home Team Tactical Centre. There's another VO but didn't see rego
Formerly, SMRT Service 811 had East and West Loop ...
Now, SBST Service 811 has North and South Loop ...
Currently,three operators got usb charger buses except TTS.
SBST:MAN A95 B3 & Volvo B8L
SMRT:MAN A95 B2(5790-5799),B3 & ADL E500 B2
GAS:MAN A95 B3
Originally posted by TIB987K:Formerly, SMRT Service 811 had East and West Loop ...
Now, SBST Service 811 has North and South Loop ...
That should have been done long time ago...
Routes 62, 103 & 123 are gross mutations of their former routes, with 62 having the shortest portion of original untouched route (Sims Ave/Kallang MRT to Aljunied Rd/Merpati Rd).
In contrast, Route 2 has the longest stretch of untouched original route as it forms its current route.
Services 42 and 92 were formerly known as M2 and M1 respectively. Service 150 is the modern version of M4.
Originally posted by SMB1368T:Coming up next:
New SMRT logo being pasted on the LRT first, beginning with old sets
They should change the corporate culture before changing logo.
Originally posted by iveco:They should change the corporate culture before changing logo.
Sadly old habit die hard among the 4 operators.Management level also got foreigners giving you orders and also penalised you.Favourism still exists.
974 join 2,61,117 & 944 as orphan route.
GAS 2 Changi Village Ter (SBST) ~ Kg Bahru Ter (SBST).
SMRT 61 Bt Batok Int (TTS) ~ Eunos Int (SBST).
SBST 117 Punggol Int (GAS) ~ Sembawang Int (SMRT).
SMRT 944 Bt Batok Int (TTS) ~ Bt Batok Rd (Loop).
TTS 974 Bt Panjang Ter (SMRT) ~ Joo Koon Int (SBST).
Originally posted by carbikebus:974 join 2,61,117 & 944 as orphan route.
GAS 2 Changi Village Ter (SBST) ~ Kg Bahru Ter (SBST).
SMRT 61 Bt Batok Int (TTS) ~ Eunos Int (SBST).
SBST 117 Punggol Int (GAS) ~ Sembawang Int (SMRT).
SMRT 944 Bt Batok Int (TTS) ~ Bt Batok Rd (Loop).
TTS 974 Bt Panjang Ter (SMRT) ~ Joo Koon Int (SBST).
SMRT 110 also, counted since 965 is at Sengkang while 110 is at Compassvale
Originally posted by JKYY:SMRT 110 also, counted since 965 is at Sengkang while 110 is at Compassvale
Oh yeah,965 isn’t orphan as it originated from Woodlands.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Oh yeah,965 isn’t orphan as it originated from Woodlands.
would 825 be considered as orphan route from yio chu kang HAHA
would 852 be considered as orphan route as yishun is technically not under SBST?
Originally posted by JKYY:would 825 be considered as orphan route from yio chu kang HAHA
would 852 be considered as orphan route as yishun is technically not under SBST?
for 852 no since yishun int has its own sbst route grp there
Originally posted by SBS2792K:for 852 no since yishun int has its own sbst route grp there
oh ya whoops my bad
Technically 852 is an orphan route too as Yishun is under SMRT although SBST is majority there.
Originally posted by JKYY:would 825 be considered as orphan route from yio chu kang HAHA
would 852 be considered as orphan route as yishun is technically not under SBST?
825 is like 868 in a way. 852 and YIS feeders are like 96 and CLE feeders.
SBS6606P (HGDEP 371/50*) is the only bus that cross overs to another service of a different depot.
Woodlands Depot is the only Depot doesn’t have any Citaros for BCM standardised fleets.
Its the only SMRT Depot which doesn’t have OCs too.
Go-Ahead doesn’t have any A22 as BCM standardised fleets.
Tower Transit doesn’t have any A95 as BCM standardised fleets.