Redeployments (Part 18)
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
look like HG side also going to put some WEGS on this svc bus like 3604P also keep doing on 74 recently .
Agree.Today got 2 WEGS on 74 from HGDEP.One is SBS 3604P and another is unknown WEG
-
Looks like 74 now have Wright perms after so many years
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
sv 72 deployment is v messy at the moment. Difficult to trace the buses. Everyday some different buses deployed. Originally, we thought 3352, 3353 were more like YCK Ter SP buses but now they are deployed even on other AMDEP services.Totally mess up.I myself end up getting confused by the daily fleet.Keep changing everyday. The problem is the BSEP WEGS.Too many BSEP WEGS is at AMDEP and AMDEP don`t know which services they want to put the BSEP WEGS on.
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
Totally mess up.I myself end up getting confused by the daily fleet.Keep changing everyday. The problem is the BSEP WEGS.Too many BSEP WEGS is at AMDEP and AMDEP don`t know which services they want to put the BSEP WEGS on.
Can throw to 86 to cater to more demand. Kick 6313J to the east to add fleet to Service 4.
-
SMB270Y still perm 960, saw the same driver as last time...
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Can throw to 86 to cater to more demand. Kick 6313J to the east to add fleet to Service 4.
But AMDEP don`t want to give to 86
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
Looks like 74 now have Wright perms after so many years
74 suddenly got super lucky
I wish sv 107 and sv 153 also get lucky soon. -
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Can throw to 86 to cater to more demand. Kick 6313J to the east to add fleet to Service 4.
AMDEP plies so many KUBs on sv 21. It should just change those SD slots to DD. -
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Can throw to 86 to cater to more demand. Kick 6313J to the east to add fleet to Service 4.
AMDEP could even try putting the DDs on 261, 265, 268, 269 on trial.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
74 suddenly got super lucky I wish sv 107 and sv 153 also get lucky
soon.Maybe tomorrow
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
But AMDEP don`t want to give to 86
But honestly, does 86 need more DDs from its current 4. I think the current fleet is managing the loading well, no!? -
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
AMDEP could even try putting the DDs on 261, 265, 268, 269 on trial.
I was about to suggest the mentioned above
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
But honestly, does 86 need more DDs from its current 4. I think the current fleet is managing the loading well, no!?I`m not sure
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
AMDEP could even try putting the DDs on 261, 265, 268, 269 on trial.
Got height limit on one of these services?
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
I was about to suggest the mentioned above
Have ADD ply on 268A and 269A to cater to the peak hour uni-directional loading. -
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
Got height limit on one of these services?
No height limit. May be turning restriction for 265 - might not be easy to navigate through some of the AMK narrow streets. -
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Have ADD ply on 268A and 269A to cater to the peak hour uni-directional loading.268 really need DD buses to cater the peak hours loading
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
No height limit. May be turning restriction for 265 - might not be easy to navigate through some of the AMK narrow streets.268,maybe can? 261,maybe can too?
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
sv 72 deployment is v messy at the moment. Difficult to trace the buses. Everyday some different buses deployed. Originally, we thought 3352, 3353 were more like YCK Ter SP buses but now they are deployed even on other AMDEP services.i think basically now this AM SP WEGs mostly for YCK Ter svcs ( 13 70 72 & 76 ) include 3352 & 3353 and also saw some also doing on svc like 25 58 168 @ times .
i hv seen 3347 & 3348 on 58 for quite a few times already .
-
How about service 112? Can it receive DD?
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
How about service 112? Can it receive DD?
should not a problem DD on 112 provided HGDEP they want to give it to 112 or they hv enough DDs to play around or not .
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
should not a problem DD on 112 provided HGDEP they want to give it to 112 or they hv enough DDs to play around or not .
I`m not sure at Hougang Street 92 part,the trees is too short,scared the DD buses can`t go in
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
I`m not sure at Hougang Street 92 part,the trees is too short,scared the DD buses can`t go in
they just hv to trim the trees will do .
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
How about service 112? Can it receive DD?
112 I don't see problem using DDs, but again do we need DDs for 112. May be in a year from now when the HG Ave 7 HDB flats will be operational, the loading for 112 can be quite significant considering it is the only service to MRT from there (if you single out the stops of 87, 151).
Also, if people use MRT most from st 92 will also walk to Ave 9 (few meters away) to take 72, 116 to HG rather than going all the way to Kovan. Having said this, the loading still can be 60+ pax at some time slots to Kovan as it is the only service connecting HG Ave 9, 8 and 2 to Kovan.
-
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:
268,maybe can? 261,maybe can too?
261 of course can. 268 also don't see problem. 269 not sure if turning issue from AMK Ave 6 but I don't think it is a tight turn. That's why i said let's put it on trial since spare buses and see!!