Profit mah,buy new buses but priority maintain other Singtel and SPF vehicles..New A22s I observed sound already like 6-7 years engine..Not to mention bent here and there for weeks,Ads not tore down properly..Hooligan drivers,Got high hump also dunno how to slow down..I dunno what will happen to the new DDs too.
sv 851 - 882
sv 851
26 buses (10 DDs, 16 DDs)
* 1 DD will crossover to 852 during AM peak. PM peak will be on 851
sv 852
13 buses (0 DDs, 13 SDs)
* 1 DD will crossover from 851 to do AM peak trip to BBT, then go off service to BMR and start on 851
sv 853
16 buses (0 DDs, 16 SDs)
* No need of DD as SDs manage loading well
sv 854
24 buses (18 DDs, 6 SDs)
* Huge increase in capacity with 18 DDs. Very much needed for this service.
sv 855
14 buses (2 DDs, 12 SDs)
* 2-split shift DDs as loading can be around 70-80 pax along some sector of Upper Thomson-YCK road and Bukit Merah area
sv 856
17 buses (17 DDs, 0 SDs)
* Full fleet DD as this service has high loading in both directions
sv 857
16 buses (8 DDs, 8 SDs)
* High capacity enhancement. Consecutive buses during AM peak will be DDs towards CBD and likewise during PM peak
sv 858
20 buses (0 DDs, 20 SDs)
sv 859
10 buses (0 DDs, 10 SDs)
* No need for DDs. Loading managed by SDs and huge parallelism with 856 that will have full fleet DDs
sv 860
7 buses (2 DD/bendy, 5 SDs)
* Definite need for high capacity buses on this route given the population around Yishun Ring Road is increasing and will continue to in the next few months/years
sv 882
3 buses (0 DDs, 3 SDs)
* Capacity enhanced with 1 bus - would also recommend the bus to loop at Irau Drive once it is operational and call at 3 new stops along this stretch.
Originally posted by lemon1974:profitable?? how can SMRT buses be profitable?
Hmm why wouldn't it be profiting?
SD gets replaced with DD > can ferry more passengers > save manpower also...
Bendy gets replaced with DD > more svc, especially thsoe DD unfriendly routes can get higher capacity buses...
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Having said that, I also told my friend it is good to have bendies also on trunk services like 67 and 176 that really need high capacity buses and cannot have them due to height restriction. Bendies are very useful here. He said 176 okay, 67 LTA is not very happy with bendies coz it plies Little India area causing congestion there.
I think if 67 does not have bendies, as of today, it will be total chaos. So good LTA is not being a dictator here. Maybe after DTL opens, 67 might not need that many bendies and can be split into two services
67 - CCK to Lor 1 Geylang
68 - Tampines to Rochor Canal Road (Loop)
Yes, it's obvious the blacklist of bendies stretches out of the city. Eg. Bukit Timah Rd is another reason why 67 bendies can be quite a trouble.
Originally posted by TIB429E:Hmm why wouldn't it be profiting?
SD gets replaced with DD > can ferry more passengers > save manpower also...
Bendy gets replaced with DD > more svc, especially thsoe DD unfriendly routes can get higher capacity buses...
A lot of buses esp those WLDEP controlled will have a lot of dead mileage. Example buses like 75,963,966,858,969,187,178,961. For KJDEP side shld 106,190 and 970 having a lot of dead mileage wich lead to excessive use of fuel, SL ending late at night.
Originally posted by carbikebus:
We see from the way they treat and usage of the buses itself not to mention their crazy deployment and runtime.Many of their buses is in horrible condition,dead mileage chui engine which lead to cost.Overspeeding is another cost as buses consume more diesel.Bus Plus also pump at the same depot.Technician doing triple jobs which lead to fatigue and half hearted work.This is why they always report bus business aint profitable.Serious talking when i was in the depot the way they maintain the buses you can vomit blood..Although SBST is neither an angel also but at least their preventive maintenance are always on time.SMRT afternoon got PM but still can do chartered leh
Yah la..that's why I've also put "as long as they can maintain properly". And it's "somewhat profitable".
Just wondering lah...given the level of passengers to ferry each day, wouldn't the bus maintenace be cui?
Let alone SMRT, even some SBST buses already having problem-loud engine from CDGE/KUB, increase in extreme vibrations from earlier batch of KUBs(worst than OCs). Does the depot have enough manpower/time/facilities? If no, why isn't there an improvement there? :/
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
812 can get additional bendy but the current loading on 812 is managed... You don't see a bendy, that is so full like 804/806 that people are not able to board... It is also due to the dual MRT option - Khatib and Yishun. But yes, if 800 capacity is reduced, 812 can get one. All for it.
if you said no high cap buses for 800, people will tend to take 812 to get to some places.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
From my same friend, who first told me about SMRT placing order for DDs, he tole me a week back that LTA is not much in favor of bendy buses not just in CBD but has more areas ear-marked where there is traffic and many bus routes plying and do not want bendies there. LTA is okay with bendies on feeder routes.
hmm i would want a proper source.
still Yishun Int has a lot of places for bendies (that is the future)
Originally posted by SMB145B:hmm i would want a proper source.
still Yishun Int has a lot of places for bendies (that is the future)
The number of bendy places for Yishun Temp Int has reduced from current interchange. Same for BPJ. Anyway, let the announcement on WAB bendy at least come out.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:sv 851 - 882
sv 851
26 buses (10 DDs, 16 DDs)
* 1 DD will crossover to 852 during AM peak. PM peak will be on 851
sv 852
13 buses (0 DDs, 13 SDs)
* 1 DD will crossover from 851 to do AM peak trip to BBT, then go off service to BMR and start on 851
sv 853
16 buses (0 DDs, 16 SDs)
* No need of DD as SDs manage loading well
sv 854
24 buses (18 DDs, 6 SDs)
* Huge increase in capacity with 18 DDs. Very much needed for this service.
sv 855
14 buses (2 DDs, 12 SDs)
* 2-split shift DDs as loading can be around 70-80 pax along some sector of Upper Thomson-YCK road and Bukit Merah area
sv 856
17 buses (17 DDs, 0 SDs)
* Full fleet DD as this service has high loading in both directions
sv 857
16 buses (8 DDs, 8 SDs)
* High capacity enhancement. Consecutive buses during AM peak will be DDs towards CBD and likewise during PM peak
sv 858
20 buses (0 DDs, 20 SDs)
sv 859
10 buses (0 DDs, 10 SDs)
* No need for DDs. Loading managed by SDs and huge parallelism with 856 that will have full fleet DDs
sv 860
7 buses (2 DD/bendy, 5 SDs)
* Definite need for high capacity buses on this route given the population around Yishun Ring Road is increasing and will continue to in the next few months/years
sv 882
3 buses (0 DDs, 3 SDs)
* Capacity enhanced with 1 bus - would also recommend the bus to loop at Irau Drive once it is operational and call at 3 new stops along this stretch.
851 : do you mean rigids? however, 16 rigids is way too much many 7 S shift bendies along with 5 S shift DDs and 12-13 rigids
852 : not to the extend of full rigids, get some DDs or at least bendies.
854 : 18 DDs?
855 does not warrant any DDs yet.
858 has an option to get some bendies, a advantage over other CGA Bound buses, especially 27.
859 route may be gone, missing routes to be covered by a SBW feeder.
860 would need a SWT route as well as getting some new DDs
882 needs more than just 3 buses.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
The number of bendy places for Yishun Temp Int has reduced from current interchange. Same for BPJ. Anyway, let the announcement on WAB bendy at least come out.
reducedbut the are still plenty of those lots.
Originally posted by SMB145B:851 : do you mean rigids? however, 16 rigids is way too much many 7 S shift bendies along with 5 S shift DDs and 12-13 rigids
852 : not to the extend of full rigids, get some DDs or at least bendies.
854 : 18 DDs?
855 does not warrant any DDs yet.
858 has an option to get some bendies, a advantage over other CGA Bound buses, especially 27.
859 route may be gone, missing routes to be covered by a SBW feeder.
860 would need a SWT route as well as getting some new DDs
882 needs more than just 3 buses.
858 will never ever get bendies nor DD.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:858 will never ever get bendies nor DD.
someone mentioned there is a bendy cameoing on 858. but when is it?
Originally posted by SMB145B:someone mentioned there is a bendy cameoing on 858. but when is it?
Bendy cameoed on 858A not 858. It was me and i took that bus (TIB1228L). It was the same day when TIB1032J cameoed on 961.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:Bendy cameoed on 858A not 858. It was me and i took that bus (TIB1228L). It was the same day when TIB1032J cameoed on 961.
oh okay
bendies on SWT but none on the full route
Originally posted by SMB145B:oh okay
bendies on SWT but none on the full route
Yes correct. But only 1 bus only, never seen another bendy on 858 after this
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:sv 851 - 882
sv 851
26 buses (10 DDs, 16 DDs)
* 1 DD will crossover to 852 during AM peak. PM peak will be on 851
sv 852
13 buses (0 DDs, 13 SDs)
* 1 DD will crossover from 851 to do AM peak trip to BBT, then go off service to BMR and start on 851
sv 853
16 buses (0 DDs, 16 SDs)
* No need of DD as SDs manage loading well
sv 854
24 buses (18 DDs, 6 SDs)
* Huge increase in capacity with 18 DDs. Very much needed for this service.
sv 855
14 buses (2 DDs, 12 SDs)
* 2-split shift DDs as loading can be around 70-80 pax along some sector of Upper Thomson-YCK road and Bukit Merah area
sv 856
17 buses (17 DDs, 0 SDs)
* Full fleet DD as this service has high loading in both directions
sv 857
16 buses (8 DDs, 8 SDs)
* High capacity enhancement. Consecutive buses during AM peak will be DDs towards CBD and likewise during PM peak
sv 858
20 buses (0 DDs, 20 SDs)
sv 859
10 buses (0 DDs, 10 SDs)
* No need for DDs. Loading managed by SDs and huge parallelism with 856 that will have full fleet DDs
sv 860
7 buses (2 DD/bendy, 5 SDs)
* Definite need for high capacity buses on this route given the population around Yishun Ring Road is increasing and will continue to in the next few months/years
sv 882
3 buses (0 DDs, 3 SDs)
* Capacity enhanced with 1 bus - would also recommend the bus to loop at Irau Drive once it is operational and call at 3 new stops along this stretch.
Presume the bendy are also WAB...
Svc851[WAB] - 30 Buses -
Fleet : 12 Double Decks, 13 Bendy, 5 Single Deck
Weekdays : 17AP, 8S1, 5S2
Weekends : 20AP, 8TQ
Svc852[WAB] - 16 Buses -
Fleet : 10 Double Decks, 6 Single Deck
Weekdays : 13AP, 1S1, 2S2
Weekends : 14AP
Svc853[WAB] - 18 Buses -
Fleet : 18 Single Deck
Weekdays : 11AP, 5S1, 2S2
Weekends : 12AP, 4S2, 2TQ
Svc856 - 22 Buses -
Fleet : 4 Double Decks, 15 Bendy, 3 Single Deck
Weekdays : 12AP, 7S1, 3S2
Weekends : 13AP, 3S2
Svc858 - 25 Buses -
Fleet : 23 Single Deck, 2 Double Deck/DD
Weekdays : 18 AP, 4S1, 2 Special Run[DD & Bendy]
Weekends : 18AP, 2TQ, 1 Special Run[DD]
*Special run-Bendy/DD will ply as 858A : Jalan Kayu <-> Woodlands
during peak hours[7-10am ; 4-9pm]
*After 2314Hrs, 858 will renumber to 858C
Svc860 - 10 Buses - BSEP
Fleet : 4 Bendy, 6 Single Deck
Weekdays : 6AP, 2S1, 2S2
Weekends : 6AP, 2TQ
Svc882 - 8 Buses - [When Sembawang is developed]
Fleet : 3 Bendy, 5 Single Deck
Weekdays : 4AP, 2S1, 1S2
Weekends : 5AP, 2TQ
Originally posted by SMB145B:if you said no high cap buses for 800, people will tend to take 812 to get to some places.
Actually people who want to go to MRT take 812 and not 800. I have seen 800 with 20-25 pax on West part of ring road to yishun ave 2. The bus gets 20-25 pax each at stops opp blk 228 and blk 257. This is where the loading reaches 70 pax. But then by increasing capacity on 804, people can rather take 804 from these two stops to Yishun MRT. Hence, I am suggesting full fleet high capacity buses for 804.
Coming to 812, people living on ring road north of ave 5 normally choose Yishun, those to the south of ave 5 opt for Khatib. That's where the load gets split well. Having said that each bus does get 80+ pax and hence completely justifies only high capacity buses.
also don't forget that for 800 with removal of bendy, one bus is also added to improve intra-town frequency.
Originally posted by SMB145B:851 : do you mean rigids? however, 16 rigids is way too much many 7 S shift bendies along with 5 S shift DDs and 12-13 rigids
852 : not to the extend of full rigids, get some DDs or at least bendies.
854 : 18 DDs?
855 does not warrant any DDs yet.
858 has an option to get some bendies, a advantage over other CGA Bound buses, especially 27.
859 route may be gone, missing routes to be covered by a SBW feeder.
860 would need a SWT route as well as getting some new DDs
882 needs more than just 3 buses.
Are you questioning the need for 18 DDs on 854???
Originally posted by SMB145B:851 : do you mean rigids? however, 16 rigids is way too much many 7 S shift bendies along with 5 S shift DDs and 12-13 rigids
852 : not to the extend of full rigids, get some DDs or at least bendies.
854 : 18 DDs?
855 does not warrant any DDs yet.
858 has an option to get some bendies, a advantage over other CGA Bound buses, especially 27.
859 route may be gone, missing routes to be covered by a SBW feeder.
860 would need a SWT route as well as getting some new DDs
882 needs more than just 3 buses.
855 definitely warrants 2 DDs. 852 is the one that does not need. Also if you see, 852 has 74 in common until King Albert Park, and 157 joins in at Macritchie and goes same route all the way till Bukit Batok.
Originally posted by SMB145B:851 : do you mean rigids? however, 16 rigids is way too much many 7 S shift bendies along with 5 S shift DDs and 12-13 rigids
852 : not to the extend of full rigids, get some DDs or at least bendies.
854 : 18 DDs?
855 does not warrant any DDs yet.
858 has an option to get some bendies, a advantage over other CGA Bound buses, especially 27.
859 route may be gone, missing routes to be covered by a SBW feeder.
860 would need a SWT route as well as getting some new DDs
882 needs more than just 3 buses.
858 cannot get Bendies due or sharp turns within airport terminal. 859 route should stay but with only SDs. For 851, I suggested 10 DDs that will leave consecutively one after another to cover peak loading towards Bukit Merah. Opposite direction loading can be managed by SD. I have done the route loading segmentation and thus suggesting 10:16 - this is already a big increase in high capacity buses for 851 which lost many Bendies when 851 became WAB.
Originally posted by SMB145B:851 : do you mean rigids? however, 16 rigids is way too much many 7 S shift bendies along with 5 S shift DDs and 12-13 rigids
852 : not to the extend of full rigids, get some DDs or at least bendies.
854 : 18 DDs?
855 does not warrant any DDs yet.
858 has an option to get some bendies, a advantage over other CGA Bound buses, especially 27.
859 route may be gone, missing routes to be covered by a SBW feeder.
860 would need a SWT route as well as getting some new DDs
882 needs more than just 3 buses.
For your comment on 882, I will just say first let them add at least one more bus. Only 2 buses in operation with horrible frequency.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Are you questioning the need for 18 DDs on 854???
And extend to pasir ris or changi village :)
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:858 cannot get Bendies due or sharp turns within airport terminal. 859 route should stay but with only SDs. For 851, I suggested 10 DDs that will leave consecutively one after another to cover peak loading towards Bukit Merah. Opposite direction loading can be managed by SD. I have done the route loading segmentation and thus suggesting 10:16 - this is already a big increase in high capacity buses for 851 which lost many Bendies when 851 became WAB.
Technically 858 could.
But in logic's perspective no.
Why? Coz it 1. Waste time, 2. Takes up space and thus blocks buses and 3. Pressurizes the BC.
However 858 rigids doesn't come at an impressive freq too to make up loss of lack of high capacity buses, thus making it lose out to 27.
And that's also why you see long queues at 858 berth at CGA everyday without fail.