LTA's Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP) (Part 2)
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr BusAnalyser, sbs 39 should stop at an interchange. The distance is too long for a looping service to and fro. The bus schedule will be better managed. Cheers.
I agree with your point. How about it terminating at UEC terminal via PIE, Simei Rd, Tanah Merah, Bedok South Ave 3, Bedok South Rd, UEC??? This way will provide new links to ITE, Tanah Merah and feeder between Tanah Merah and Bedok South road that does not have a device today.
-
Originally posted by TIB429E:
The location is most likely together with Woodlands North Coast Interchange(MRT)
Yes makes sense to have it connected with Woodlands North MRT.
-
With introduction of Woodlands north can have two industrial services launched - Senekp and woodlands industrial estate.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
I agree with your point. How about it terminating at UEC terminal via PIE, Simei Rd, Tanah Merah, Bedok South Ave 3, Bedok South Rd, UEC??? This way will provide new links to ITE, Tanah Merah and feeder between Tanah Merah and Bedok South road that does not have a device today.
Hi mr BusAnalyser, yes good. In this way, the super crowded tampines interchange will be offloaded by 1 bus service! Provide some breathing space! Cheers.
-
services to be at Sembawang Int
171, 852, 853, 860 (shifted from Yishun Int)
187 (shifted from Woodlands Reg Int)
883 (to Punggol Int)
865 (to HarbourFront)
-
Originally posted by SMB145B:
services to be at Sembawang Int
171, 852, 853, 860 (shifted from Yishun Int)
187 (shifted from Woodlands Reg Int)
883 (to Punggol Int)
865 (to HarbourFront)
865, 883?
860 stays at Yishun for now. Have you seen the loading between Yishun Int and Ring Road for this service? Are you sure you want to inconvenience so many people?
According to me, services at Sembawang Int
39 - simply extend via Yishun Ave 2
171 - Sembawang Rd, Yishun Ave 5, Yishun Ave 2
If you are already extending two services, I don't see a particular reason why 852 or 853 needs to be extended to Sembawang Interchange as it either needs to go via Sembawang Rd (856, 859) or Yishun Ave 2 (will have 39, 171).
-
171 turn to Ave 5 then instead of turning right to Int it turn left to Ave 2 then to Sembawang.Yishun can introduced new svc to Zoo via 171 routes from Ave 5 to Mandai
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
865, 883?
860 stays at Yishun for now. Have you seen the loading between Yishun Int and Ring Road for this service? Are you sure you want to inconvenience so many people?
According to me, services at Sembawang Int
39 - simply extend via Yishun Ave 2
171 - Sembawang Rd, Yishun Ave 5, Yishun Ave 2
If you are already extending two services, I don't see a particular reason why 852 or 853 needs to be extended to Sembawang Interchange as it either needs to go via Sembawang Rd (856, 859) or Yishun Ave 2 (will have 39, 171).
New svc la haha
-
Isnt sv171 route long enough?!
New route would be better... -
171 mainly express along Mandai...probably if start from Sembawang can terminate at Bukit Batok?Then introduced a new svc from Cck looping at Marina bay sands?
-
I think Yishun should be getting 1 more BSEP service..prob running along Yishun Ave 4 etc.
For 803, I guess the demand should get higher around May/June with more HDB openning..
-
Originally posted by TIB429E:
I think Yishun should be getting 1 more BSEP service..prob running along Yishun Ave 4 etc.
For 803, I guess the demand should get higher around May/June with more HDB openning..
803 will get one more bus stop in future a long yishun ave 6. Yishun needs one more feeder but along at 20. 21, 22. I wonder why these streets have not been given a well deserved route. This route should loop at Yishun industrial estate, creating bi-directional loading.
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
Isnt sv171 route long enough?!
New route would be better...But the proposal is to have 171 ply Sembawang to CCK... Then it is fine... Route redundant between BPJ and Marina bay.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
But the proposal is to have 171 ply Sembawang to CCK... Then it is fine... Route redundant between BPJ and Marina bay.
If we rationalise too much it will bcme NE corridor where buses r chopped up 2 much... DTL still nd at least 1 oth bus 2 town bsides 170...
Best another new svc to CCK...
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
If we rationalise too much it will bcme NE corridor where buses r chopped up 2 much... DTL still nd at least 1 oth bus 2 town bsides 170...
Best another new svc to CCK...
Hi mr Acx1688, yes I agree. Previously the Northeast bus services were drastically amended due to the MRT. Cheers.
-
OT again, LTA should seriously look at the buses that were chopped up ie 97,106,111 and double check to see if the bus routes can be further extended...
97 4 example can be extended to Punggol via KPE, Sengkang east, punggol central
-
111 can go to Tampines North via ECP, Still Rd south, eunos, kaki bukit tamp ave 8/10? New links created...
-
Still on SBW, quick link fr Tamp North via ave 8/10 TPE, SLE, Upp thomson,sembawang rd, sembawang MRT, wd ave 7/2 sle,bke,kje,cck dr,yew tee mrt
Any opinions, feel free to chop n change
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
803 will get one more bus stop in future a long yishun ave 6. Yishun needs one more feeder but along at 20. 21, 22. I wonder why these streets have not been given a well deserved route. This route should loop at Yishun industrial estate, creating bi-directional loading.
Hmm not sure about the rest but I heard that there would be another new svc, maybe 813 or 805, along ave4(4 头)
I forsee 803 will also be like 860 around May/June.
Quite impressive that BSEP is rather useful for Yishun Residents
-
Originally posted by TIB429E:
Hmm not sure about the rest but I heard that there would be another new svc, maybe 813 or 805, along ave4(4 头)
I forsee 803 will also be like 860 around May/June.
Quite impressive that BSEP is rather useful for Yishun Residents
But you already have 812 right? Direct connection from Yishun. What ave 4 needs is a direct connection to Khatib MRT, not another service to ave4.
-
Originally posted by Acx1688:
OT again, LTA should seriously look at the buses that were chopped up ie 97,106,111 and double check to see if the bus routes can be further extended...
97 4 example can be extended to Punggol via KPE, Sengkang east, punggol central
I don't recommend the super long routes. Causes too much disruption in schedule and on time arrivals. The only one I think really makes sense is 82/107 merger.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
But you already have 812 right? Direct connection from Yishun. What ave 4 needs is a direct connection to Khatib MRT, not another service to ave4.
That's what I have heard...we shall see~ Oo
-
Long routes is ok as long 40% of the routes is express...A route from Boon Lay to Pasir Ris plying PIE?
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Long routes is ok as long 40% of the routes is express…A route from Boon Lay to Pasir Ris plying PIE?
It is possible but i hope it is not like former 989 CCK to CGA. Wish they have a new SMRT svc to CGA
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
It is possible but i hope it is not like former 989 CCK to CGA. Wish they have a new SMRT svc to CGA
First LTA needs to upgrade bus infrastructure at cga according to me.
