Suspected Redeployments (Part 4)
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
i suspect SBS8622D is out of Sv 113. There has been replacement buses for this bus, SBS8893M and an unknown DM3500 for 2 days straight already. SBS8622D has not been on 113 for almost a week already. [159's cut-out guide stix is still not torn off.]
Someone mentioned previously 8893M has an ad? Does it have an ad now?
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
i suspect SBS8622D is out of Sv 113. There has been replacement buses for this bus, SBS8893M and an unknown DM3500 for 2 days straight already. SBS8622D has not been on 113 for almost a week already. [159's cut-out guide stix is still not torn off.]
Last Sunday, SBS8622D and SBS8893M were spotted on 113.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Someone mentioned previously 8893M has an ad? Does it have an ad now?
No. There is no ad.
-
Now SBS8622D engine cui already. Last time when it was on 159 and sometimes cameo on 113 the radiator was quiet, smooth and comfortable to ride on. Now after being permanently deployed to 113, the engine same like 5010P, 5011L, 5012J and 5013G. Roaring Radiators
-
SBS8071T
(BBDEP 282
BBDEP 156) -
SBS8955T >> SL SP .. its replaced by 8956R (8956R has 242 perm writing spotted)
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
Now SBS8622D engine cui already. Last time when it was on 159 and sometimes cameo on 113 the radiator was quiet, smooth and comfortable to ride on. Now after being permanently deployed to 113, the engine same like 5010P, 5011L, 5012J and 5013G. Roaring Radiators
Damn...
-
Originally posted by SMB238S:
TIB1233X TIB1234T
WLDEP SP > WLBP 960
Reasons:
1. These buses doesn't even seem like performing as a Spare Bus. If not it will be commonly seen cameo-ing on Woodlands Feeders / Intra-Towns.
2. These buses either stick to 960, 962, and 964, as 960 buses are interchangeable with 962 and 964 bendies.
3. I have taken those two buses on 960, usually on AP shift.
OR
4. Fleet add, which is the impossible, as 270Y has been added into the fleet under 960AP15, whereby lots of users confused whether 270Y is WLDEP SP or WLBP 960.
In conclusion, there are 2 - 4 bendies got kicked out from 960.
SMB270Y has a fixed slot. When SMB270Y went missing 504X* appears but when SMB270Y appears 504X happens to be missing.
Formerly 504X is the duty 1 bus for 960 before being changed over to take 75.
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
No. There is no ad.
Yeaps, many thanks for the info. Spotted 8893M today & yesterday again on Sv 85, without an ad still. So idk what did that user, who said 8893M was perm HG 85 because it had an ad, actually see.
Anyway 8893M & 6054G both on Sv 85 today. Not their usual timings in any case. So Sv 85's actual fleet is still quite a mess. I'm still inclined to think there's a likely fleet add somewhere..
-
Is 8658B out of 58? I thought I saw it some time recently.
These days there are couple of users editing sgwiki here and there.
-
Originally posted by Rui jing:
Is 8658B out of 58? I thought I saw it some time recently.
These days there are couple of users editing sgwiki here and there.
There's 2 missing bus acc to Wiki~
but, the more I look at the past edits on Wiki, it doesn't quite make sense? Someone added 3384Z to Sv 58, but then in between he or maybe someone else after him took out 8658B?
So doesn't this imply that 3384Z replaces 8658B? That totally is illogical, 1st time I see a BSEP bus replace a non-BSEP bus. BSEP buses should be fleet adds mah..The other missing bus is for 9389X's replacement, so that one is legit.
-
Anyway, did anyone see 9579P on Sv 37 these 2 weeks? 3650E stuck on Sv 37 IIRC for this week. And I've spotted all the other perms on Sv 37 this week so far~
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Yeaps, many thanks for the info. Spotted 8893M today & yesterday again on Sv 85, without an ad still. So idk what did that user, who said 8893M was perm HG 85 because it had an ad, actually see.
Anyway 8893M & 6054G both on Sv 85 today. Not their usual timings in any case. So Sv 85's actual fleet is still quite a mess. I'm still inclined to think there's a likely fleet add somewhere..
TT user is Acx1688 n he misread 8893 n 8993
Thank you
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
There's 2 missing bus acc to Wiki~
but, the more I look at the past edits on Wiki, it doesn't quite make sense? Someone added 3384Z to Sv 58, but then in between he or maybe someone else after him took out 8658B?
So doesn't this imply that 3384Z replaces 8658B? That totally is illogical, 1st time I see a BSEP bus replace a non-BSEP bus. BSEP buses should be fleet adds mah..The other missing bus is for 9389X's replacement, so that one is legit.
I think 3384Z is doing other service also lately but did 58 at first but as of 9389X think another normal DD will replace him soon. So most probably if 3384Z did 58 again on weekdays S shift,I think most probably fleet add to 21 buses
-
Originally posted by Rui jing:
Is 8658B out of 58? I thought I saw it some time recently.
These days there are couple of users editing sgwiki here and there.
Yes still doing Sv.58 including today as per normal some idiot pls don go anyhow edit
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
There's 2 missing bus acc to Wiki~
but, the more I look at the past edits on Wiki, it doesn't quite make sense? Someone added 3384Z to Sv 58, but then in between he or maybe someone else after him took out 8658B?
So doesn't this imply that 3384Z replaces 8658B? That totally is illogical, 1st time I see a BSEP bus replace a non-BSEP bus. BSEP buses should be fleet adds mah..The other missing bus is for 9389X's replacement, so that one is legit.
Not sure if these two users are friends with each other or what, it seems that when the first edits changes, the other also starts to edit changes.
As for 8658B case, I dont think this bus is out. Seems like there is no point in checking wiki these days since many a time things are messed up..
-
Originally posted by Rui jing:
Not sure if these two users are friends with each other or what, it seems that when the first edits changes, the other also starts to edit changes.
As for 8658B case, I dont think this bus is out. Seems like there is no point in checking wiki these days since many a time things are messed up..
I agree 8658B is still Doing 58 as usual daily! And this idiot who go n say pls don mess out this redeployments thanks. I also been observing Sv.58 fleet almost daily!
-
Originally posted by SBS5111G:
Yes still doing Sv.58 including today as per normal some idiot pls don go anyhow edit
Alright thanks. :) I think some of us need to standby at sgwiki page so that these users dont stand a chance to leave things their way. cheers.
-
SBS9594U should be perm SLBP 246. Have been on 246 for the past few months.
Also, suspect SBS8955T to be SLBP 199.
-
Suspect 3740D to perm BB 196. 9362Y has been replacing 3740D when it went away for a while. It came back with a legoland ad today.
9358K on the other hand seems to be also a temporary replacement for the Vo. 7354J seems to be doing 65 since 2 weeks back.
9358K and 9362Y are likely spares still. Dont think these 2 buses will be deployed since it will be going off soon.
-
Originally posted by Rui jing:
Suspect 3740D to perm BB 196. 9362Y has been replacing 3740D when it went away for a while. It came back with a legoland ad today.
9358K on the other hand seems to be also a temporary replacement for the Vo. 7354J seems to be doing 65 since 2 weeks back.
9358K and 9362Y are likely spares still. Dont think these 2 buses will be deployed since it will be going off soon.
SBS9362Y on 10 once, I thought is rare cameo from 196...
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Anyway, did anyone see 9579P on Sv 37 these 2 weeks? 3650E stuck on Sv 37 IIRC for this week. And I've spotted all the other perms on Sv 37 this week so far~
Hi 9631X,
From my observations, 3650 seems to be taking the slot. Spotted 9579 on 8 this week though.
And as the SGWiki edits, SBS3004X seems to be editing all the wrong deployments / summing up the advertisements into one.
Someone needs to look into that!
-
Originally posted by SBS1929R:
And as the SGWiki edits, SBS3004X seems to be editing all the wrong deployments / summing up the advertisements into one.
Someone needs to look into that!
You mean the SGForums user here?
-
I really dun understand why 58 need so much buses?Can just convert its SDs into DDs mah..Svc only packed to the brim during peaks and off peak SDs can managed well alongside its full day DDs..59 really need DDs.On the other hand 119 ridership is steadily increase...
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
I really dun understand why 58 need so much buses?Can just convert its SDs into DDs mah..Svc only packed to the brim during peaks and off peak SDs can managed well alongside its full day DDs..59 really need DDs.On the other hand 119 ridership is steadily increase…
58 needs DDs for UBI.. It is the only bus catering on this road, and in peak hours, you have 40-45 pax boarding at the middle stop... But agreed, they should have converted more SD slots to DD. But then i am happy if BSEP buses are added to routes rather than keep them spare.3347/48/49/54/55 are mostly spare... they operate only few days in a month.