Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:so 882A is good right... 882 desperately needed a fleet add especially for Montreal Link... Sembawang end... low pax... so still ok...
882A
Off Service route
Sembwang Road
Canberra Link
Sembawang Drive
Sembawang Vista
there is no AM Peak.
hopefully the SWT 882A will evolve into a new service serving the newer flats near the future Canberra MRT.
Services 27A, 43A, 113, Buangkok Interchange
27 should be calling there too
Originally posted by SBS3004X:Services 27A, 43A, 113, Buangkok Interchange
43B u mean...
Originally posted by SBS3004X:Services 27A, 43A, 113, Buangkok Interchange
There is no Buangkok Interchange until 2018-2019.
Before an integrated Buangkok Interchange is constructed, it could make sense to build a Buangkok Terminal near MRT. There is enough space to build terminal for say 7-8 parking lots for 3 services. With HCI getting crowded and Sengkang Interchange also not left with many slots... Buangkok Terminal is quite needed.
It will also be good to connect Upper Serangoon and Anchorvale/Fernvale to Buangkok once terminal is created. Another link can be for Buangkok Link, HG st 51 residents for whom Buangkok MRT is closer.
Originally posted by carbikebus:86 should be under Hgdep…
11, 64 should go to BRBP... nearer to sims place 141 can go BRBP full control
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Before an integrated Buangkok Interchange is constructed, it could make sense to build a Buangkok Terminal near MRT. There is enough space to build terminal for say 7-8 parking lots for 3 services. With HCI getting crowded and Sengkang Interchange also not left with many slots... Buangkok Terminal is quite needed.
It will also be good to connect Upper Serangoon and Anchorvale/Fernvale to Buangkok once terminal is created. Another link can be for Buangkok Link, HG st 51 residents for whom Buangkok MRT is closer.
if only 27A/B, Svc 43A and 113 terminate there then only 113 will be the only full day bus svc, so no need too many parking lots. Can be a roadside terminal like ghim moh or huching ter or better, like tuas terminal can already
Originally posted by iveco:
When LYBP starts operations I hope 64 can go to BNDEP and 86 can go to HGDEP.
86 AMDEP also okay...
Originally posted by SBS5010P:11, 64 should go to BRBP... nearer to sims place 141 can go BRBP full control
Yes 141 should be full BRBP control.. one of the weirdest to have dual depot control.. 86, 87 makes sense to be dual depot control then.
Originally posted by SBS5010P:if only 27A/B, Svc 43A and 113 terminate there then only 113 will be the only full day bus svc, so no need too many parking lots. Can be a roadside terminal like ghim moh or huching ter or better, like tuas terminal can already
Yes but you can have new service to Buangkok Link and another to Fernvale from there if there are more slots.. better to have 8-9 parking lots... enough space.
Originally posted by lemon1974:22 45 50 72 will be getting BSEP fleet add wef from 18/8/14... there should be more services involved...
3410G 22 today.
Hougang Ctrl Int
Upper Serangoon Rd
Blk 302
Nativity Church Ctr
Opp S’goon JC
Glad Tidings Church
Kovan MRT Station
Opp The Helping Hand
Aft S’goon Shopping Ctr
Paya Lebar Camp
Blk 416
Serangoon Ctrl
S’goon Stn
Blk 261
Yio Chu Kang Link
Opp Serangoon Swimming Cplx
Yio Chu Kang Rd
Before St Helier’s Ave
Aft S’goon Nth Ave 1
Blk 133
Blk 138
Opp Gracehaven S Army
Opp Blk 953
Buangkok Green
Opp Blk 968
Opp Blk 910
Opp Blk 579
Opp Blk 565
Buangkok Dr
Opp Blk 558
Buangkok Int
It is time to introduce additional PM runs for sv 850E.
Yesterday bus was already packed to door when it passed Dhoby Ghaut.
Proposal is to have 4 buses - all MANs... as the 2 BSEP ADLs is better to crossover to 969.
Timings: 5.50, 6.10, 6.30 and 6.50 from Shenton Way.
Originally posted by carbikebus:To solve the problem introduce 850 from SBW-Shenton Way..from Yishun then express…
What problem?
All, the bus poles at TPE stops are up. There are 2 different bus poles. 1 for bus stop 1a and 1 for bus stop 1b. Both are put in the middle. Cheers.
194 and 402 with timetable revisions from 18 August as well...
6467Z did 194 on (18/8) while 6416X did 194 ytd (20/8). For 402's case, 6471K did 402 on 19/8.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:194 and 402 with timetable revisions from 18 August as well...
6467Z did 194 on (18/8) while 6416X did 194 ytd (20/8). For 402's case, 6471K did 402 on 19/8.
Yesterday i saw SBS6367D on 194.
Train fault at NEL AUG 21, would have ease suffering of commuters if 82/107 was merged...
Originally posted by Acx1688:Train fault at NEL AUG 21, would have ease suffering of commuters if 82/107 was merged...
Not feasible. LTA mentioned specifically to avoid introducing too many long-haul routes.
If 82/107 is merged, there will be half the buses available to ferry the people, and more prone to traffic conditions.