Originally posted by carbikebus:150 can ply 15 Joo Chiat/Telok Kurau and loop at MP rather than M Terrace.
Yes here is my proposal.
150
Eunos Interchange >> Sims Ave East >> Still Road >> Joo Chiat Road >> Telok Kurau Road >> Marine Parade Road (loop) & back
* 150 operates with fleet of 07 SDs at frequency of 07-08 mins.
15
Pasir Ris Interchange >> existing route >> Still Road >> Still Road South >> Marine Parade Road (loop) & back
* 15 operates with fleet of 20 buses with 15 DDs, 5 SDs
966
Woodlands Interchange >> existing route >> Eunos Link >> Sims Ave East >> New Upper Changi Road >> Bedok interchange
* Provides direct connection between Bukit Panjang, Trellis Towers, Geylang Bahru Industrial Estate to Bedok
* Having a terminal point at Bedok will also ensure better reliability given that 966 looping point is too far from originating point + some relief to BCs
* Those traveling to Marine Parade can transfer to sv 15 @ Eunos Link
* Possibly this suggestion will get me a lot of "hate replies" :)
854
Yishun Interchange >> existing route >> Eunos Link >> Changi Road >> Jalan Turi >> Eunos Interchange
* Given the parallelism with 25 from Hougang Ave 2/YCK Road junction to Bedok, this will not inconvenience any pax. Moreover, sv 25 has a superior DD frequency of 05-07 mins.
* Can reduce number of buses to 25 but deploy 20 HC, 5 rigids.
* 854 will provide good connectivity to the Eunos-Hougang-YCK-Yishun stretch where it is needed the most.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by carbikebus:I would prefer 137 start from Sims Place loop at Ubi Ind estates via Civil Defence bldg then turn right/left follow 58 bus stops.
My proposal for 137
Sims Place Terminal >> Sims Dr >> Lor 17 Geylang >> Sims Ave >> Paya Lebar Road (EWL/CCL @ Paya Lebar, DTL3/CCL @ Macpherson) >> UBI Ave 2 >> UBI Road 1 (Bef Traffic Police HQ, Opp Oxley Bizhub 2) >> UBI Ave 4 (Paya Lebar Fire Station) >> UBI Road 2 (exp) >> Airport Road >> Eunos Link >> Kaki Bukit Ave 2 (Kaki Bukit Autohub) >> Kaki Bukit Road 3 (Opp Empire Technocenter) >> Kaki Bukit Ave 1 (DTL3 MRT) >> Kaki Bukit Road 4 (Bartley Bizcenter) >> Kaki Bukit Road 6 (Synergy @ KB) >> Bartley Road East (Aft Homestay Lodge) & back via Kaki Bukit Road 4 to Sims Place via same roads.
* All stop italized in pink are new stops not covered today by any existing service. With DTL3 coming in, it is going to be difficult for company buses to have so many pick up/drop points. Hence, it will be necessary to have a service connect UBI and Kaki Bukit North industrial estates to DTL3/CCL/EWL.
* This service provides MRT connection at Paya Lebar for EWL, Macpherson for CCL/DTL3 and Kaki Bukit for DTL3.
* The service is made to ply Bartley road east given the high number of lodges/dorms in the area + many new industrial buildings TOP in last 2 years + coming in 2017
* This is primarily an industrial service, hence suggest it is full fleet DD with high frequency of 08-10 mins to begin with and off-peak/weekends to have frequency of 17-20 mins.
* Thoughts?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Yes here is my proposal.
150
Eunos Interchange >> Sims Ave East >> Still Road >> Joo Chiat Road >> Telok Kurau Road >> Marine Parade Road (loop) & back
* 150 operates with fleet of 07 SDs at frequency of 07-08 mins.
15
Pasir Ris Interchange >> existing route >> Still Road >> Still Road South >> Marine Parade Road (loop) & back
* 15 operates with fleet of 20 buses with 15 DDs, 5 SDs
966
Woodlands Interchange >> existing route >> Eunos Link >> Sims Ave East >> New Upper Changi Road >> Bedok interchange
* Provides direct connection between Bukit Panjang, Trellis Towers, Geylang Bahru Industrial Estate to Bedok
* Having a terminal point at Bedok will also ensure better reliability given that 966 looping point is too far from originating point + some relief to BCs
* Those traveling to Marine Parade can transfer to sv 15 @ Eunos Link
* Possibly this suggestion will get me a lot of "hate replies" :)
854
Yishun Interchange >> existing route >> Eunos Link >> Changi Road >> Jalan Turi >> Eunos Interchange
* Given the parallelism with 25 from Hougang Ave 2/YCK Road junction to Bedok, this will not inconvenience any pax. Moreover, sv 25 has a superior DD frequency of 05-07 mins.
* Can reduce number of buses to 25 but deploy 20 HC, 5 rigids.
* 854 will provide good connectivity to the Eunos-Hougang-YCK-Yishun stretch where it is needed the most.
Thoughts?
Seriously its tip top👌���Maybe Mr 76 planner can see this.
Seriously,One day you should try the Senior Bus Planner job at Al Tee A..Your route make more sense than errr the new existing service.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Seriously,One day you should try the Senior Bus Planner job at Al Tee A..Your route make more sense than errr the new existing service.
Thank you bro. Maybe when I retire ;-)
While you guys are at it, why not remove svc 66 and 67?
Originally posted by SMB145B:While you guys are at it, why not remove svc 66 and 67?
I second that. Remove 67. 66 can keep.
Suggest to move the discussion to Route Suggestions thread. This thread for officially announced or semi-officially leaked route updates.
Originally posted by AntiDennisLance:I second that. Remove 67. 66 can keep.
Suggest to move the discussion to Route Suggestions thread. This thread for officially announced or semi-officially leaked route updates.
If 67 is removed what svc is gonna cover the eastern sectors?
I would much rather the svc gets sped up to skip certain sectors like BKT Rd...
Originally posted by SMB128B:If 67 is removed what svc is gonna cover the eastern sectors?
I would much rather the svc gets sped up to skip certain sectors like BKT Rd...
I seconded that�Or at least delete some redundant sectors..67 CCK-Eunos.61 also need some modifications...
While we are on the subject, they need to take a hard look at the routes of certain services
14
15
27
46
51
61
66
67
150
167
171
178
256
858
961
* The services listed above are either unreliable because of their winding route / long looping point OR don't have loading (poorly designed).
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:While we are on the subject, they need to take a hard look at the routes of certain services
14
15
27
46
51
61
66
67
150
167
171
178
256
858
961
* The services listed above are either unreliable because of their winding route / long looping point OR don't have loading (poorly designed).
Perhaps some more…
5 (PSR-Simei), 24, 32, 36, 62, 63, 64, 700A, 852, 966, 980
Originally posted by AJQZC:Perhaps some more…
5 (PSR-Simei), 24, 32, 36, 63, 64, 700A, 852, 966, 980
Yes it's quite a long list of winding services that need to be relooked at because public is not going to take buses for such long distances especially if they are so winding. If they go direct to the point and connect towns, they will be useful substitutes to MRT. If they wind, no chance 99% prefer take MRT -> bus than do bus all the way.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Yes it's quite a long list of winding services that need to be relooked at because public is not going to take buses for such long distances especially if they are so winding. If they go direct to the point and connect towns, they will be useful substitutes to MRT. If they wind, no chance 99% prefer take MRT -> bus than do bus all the way.
��Well said..They purposely make it winding to earn more $$$$$$ at the expense of commuters.
Originally posted by AJQZC:Perhaps some more…
5 (PSR-Simei), 24, 32, 36, 62, 63, 64, 700A, 852, 966, 980
Yea 5 has big problem... Super big delays all day everyday...
Loading no problem tho?
Rather than chopping here and there why don't make big adjustment to long distance winding routes?For instance can make some sector express by skipping some stops.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Rather than chopping here and there why don't make big adjustment to long distance winding routes?For instance can make some sector express by skipping some stops.
Long suggested...
But LTA will not have it...
Neither will our dear mr dupdup77 here...
Originally posted by SMB128B:Long suggested...
But LTA will not have it...
Neither will our dear mr dupdup77 here...
Maybe you should talk to Mr Tan HR..
Originally posted by carbikebus:Rather than chopping here and there why don't make big adjustment to long distance winding routes?For instance can make some sector express by skipping some stops.
We had RapidBus 700 for that remember? Wonder what happened to that concept. Should just rename 700 to 973 or something. The 700 series route concept is now defunct and only existing in peak hour SBST e (10e, 174e) services.
Originally posted by AntiDennisLance:We had RapidBus 700 for that remember? Wonder what happened to that concept. Should just rename 700 to 973 or something. The 700 series route concept is now defunct and only existing in peak hour SBST e (10e, 174e) services.
Peak hour limited express service is far from the original RapidBus >>700. It lacks the bus priority system used on RapidBus >>700.
Originally posted by SMB145B:Peak hour limited express service is far from the original RapidBus >>700. It lacks the bus priority system used on RapidBus >>700.
Yes, thats why peak hour limited express services is only a small part of the original RapidBus concept. IIRC RapidBus was supposed to be a full day service.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Maybe you should talk to Mr Tan HR..
Is he using the moniker SBS9819Y?
There has been a lot of promotion of the service these few days in my estate, so no surprise
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:883 lai liao!
As usual. No updates to transitlink and other apps.