Why didn't they use 373 instead?
Hougang-Sengkang still got 2 more new svc after this 374.
Loyang still got 2 new svc.
Seletar still got 2 new svc.
Bedok still got 1 new svc.
Tampines still 1 more svc.
Serangoon-Eunos got 1 more new svc.
Jurong West 2 new svc.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Why didn't they use 373 instead?
Probably to reserve it for one (final / planned / upcoming) feeder service from Sengkang main Int.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Why didn't they use 373 instead?
I never understand how they decide on the numbers. For instance, Punggol first feeder number is 386... Pasir Ris feeder number 354... Looks like planner didnt like 351, 352 or 353.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:I never understand how they decide on the numbers. For instance, Punggol first feeder number is 386... Pasir Ris feeder number 354... Looks like planner didnt like 351, 352 or 353.
Historical reasons. Pasir Ris townlinks 358, 359 formed from the old feeders 351/355 and 352/353.
Originally posted by AJQZC:Historical reasons. Pasir Ris townlinks 358, 359 formed from the old feeders 351/355 and 352/353.
386?
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr busanalyser, I think they keep in mind that they don't want to duplicate LRT network too much when implementing new feeder routes. Cheers. Thanks.
duplicate 3 stops not that bad... now 163 saikung all the sengkang west and some eastlrt load during bdown
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:386?
If I'm not mistaken former Eunos Feeder?
Originally posted by hgdep103:duplicate 3 stops not that bad... now 163 saikung all the sengkang west and some eastlrt load during bdown
Originally posted by carbikebus:If I'm not mistaken former Eunos Feeder?
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:I was gg to suggest the route... This service can also be an alternative bus for Svc 163 which needs to wait for a long time... I waited for SVc 163 for 20 mins before..
Originally posted by hgdep103:duplicate 3 stops not that bad... now 163 saikung all the sengkang west and some eastlrt load during bdown
Hi mr hgdep103, yes I know. Purposely make 163 journey time long so that the waiting time is no good. Furthermore, huge sector of Sengkang east ave only has 163/163M. Why? Don't want duplicate LRT.
Even Sengkang west ave used to have only 163 until 50 comes along the way. Why? Don't want duplicate LRT again. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by carbikebus:If I'm not mistaken former Eunos Feeder?
The 38x series are in use for Eunos feeders until they merged with trunk services in 2002...it's been more than 10 years for the planners to recall.
Bedok needs what service when almost all Bedok service ply everywhere to the east , West , North , south , downtown , neighbouring roads all are well served . So this new number gonna do what ? Express service like 506/518? ?
sekali the Bedok service go terminate at Bukit Batok. In fact the north west side only has 67 which is super winding
Originally posted by Formususeonly:Bedok needs what service when almost all Bedok service ply everywhere to the east , West , North , south , downtown , neighbouring roads all are well served . So this new number gonna do what ? Express service like 506/518? ?
Just to fill up number?Maybe Svc 1 since 9 is the only single digit svc left for Bedok package?
My guess Serangoon-Eunos will be 137.
Loyang maybe feeder and that svc 68?
Tampines might be from Changi Biz Park?44?
Hougang-Sengkang might be that express and one more feeder?
Seletar might be using 71?164?861?
Jurong West might be from Tuas?250/259?
I think 144,146,148 & 149 might be for Bidadari?
Originally posted by Gus.chong:The 38x series are in use for Eunos feeders until they merged with trunk services in 2002...it's been more than 10 years for the planners to recall.
I hope after the Eunos industrial park completely demolished,There will be BTOs along Eunos and Eunos can have a new feeder svc..
ps you forgot 226
Originally posted by SMB1368T:ps you forgot 226
The issue of 226 is not so much relevant in the present context when we are talking about only Eunos feeders...
Eunos feeder lta won't be provided even though the email to say that to kaki bukit ave 2 .Road 3 to ave 3 to ave 4 the lta said that there are bus service to kaki bukit ave 1 and walk in to the area
Originally posted by vampier77:Eunos feeder lta won't be provided even though the email to say that to kaki bukit ave 2 .Road 3 to ave 3 to ave 4 the lta said that there are bus service to kaki bukit ave 1 and walk in to the area
Hi mr vampier77, why the fixation with eunos? Cheers. Thanks.
what I am saying is that 226 went from Bedok to Bedok Reservoir while 385 went from Eunos to Bedok Reservoir...
He aint satisfied with the bus services in his area
Originally posted by SMB1368T:what I am saying is that 226 went from Bedok to Bedok Reservoir while 385 went from Eunos to Bedok Reservoir...
He aint satisfied with the bus services in his area
Hi mr smb1368T, yes everybody can be dissatisfied with the bus services in his house area. However he also must give proper connections regarding what is required and proposed so that we can note the roads which are required to be given a boost. His messages are often unclear and not conclusive. Looks like pasting same type of messages in almost every other thread. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:I am surprised they didn't try to connect it to Seletar Mall for Anchorvale crescent and Sengkang West Way residents.
Loading should be okay between Anchorvale Crescent and Sengkang MRT, poor between Thangham looping point. Don't see the point of looping 374 there when there is almost no development yet that is ready.
I guess it is a route keeping the 2020+ in mind.
U could be right, according to ura master plan there would be a number of schs coming up near thanggam lrt, which would need better direct access.
