Suggestion bus service 152 Compassvale bus interchange-marina Parade loop
Sengkeng east rd
Buangkok dr
Hougang ave 6
Hougang ave 10
Hougang ave 2
Hougang ave 3
Eunos link
Jalan eunos
Still rd
east coast Rd
Joo Chai rd
Marine Parade loop
Joo Chai rd
east coast Rd
still rd
jalan eunos
Eunos link
Hougang ave 3
Hougang ave 2
Hougang ave 10
Hougang ave 6
Buangkok dr
Sengkeng east rd
Sengkeng square Compassvale bus interchange
For the feedback above list and the email sent to the suggestion of the bus service network lta said that cannot afford to provide the bus service
Oops I am referring to SK East Rd, Way & Dr then KPE
110 (SK to Suntec City)
Punggol Rd, Field, Way
TPE/CTE
Scotts Rd
Orchard Rd
Bras Basah Rd
(loop)
Unknown number (Buangkok to JE; 2020)
Sengkang Central
NSE/BKE
Bukit Panjang Rd
Bukit Batok West Ave 2
Jurong East Central
Think i have posted for like numerous times
95
Buona Vista - Clementi MRT
Originally posted by SBS9252G:Think i have posted for like numerous times
95
Buona Vista - Clementi MRT
- Holland Dr
- Nth Buona Vista Rd
- Holland Rd
- Holland Ave
- C'wealth Ave
- current route of 95
- Kent Ridge Crescent
- Clementi Rd
- AYE
- Clementi Ave 6
- C'wealth Ave West
- Clementi Ave 2
- Clementi Ave 5
- Clementi Ave 4 (No Stop)
- Clementi Ave 3
- C'wealth Ave West
- Clementi Ave 6
- AYE
- Clementi Rd
- Kent Ridge Crescent
- current 95 route towards Holland Dr
62Punggol - Marina Centre
- Current route
- Crawford Rd
- Beach Rd
- Bras Basah Rd
- Temasek Blvd
- Temasek Ave
62 loop at Geylang already got bunching issue somemore at Suntec?I proposed to terminate at Lor 1 Geylang better
Originally posted by orange28:Looks good, if cannot make space at HarbourFront Terminal then can consider extending the route on the other end to Marina Centre Terminal via Marina/Central Blvd, Bayfront Ave (and essentially follow svc 97 route to/fro MCT), and then loop at Telok Blangah Heights/Drive like what svc 124 used to do ...
Good call. Edited.
Originally posted by SBS9252G:Think i have posted for like numerous times
95
Buona Vista - Clementi MRT
- Holland Dr
- Nth Buona Vista Rd
- Holland Rd
- Holland Ave
- C'wealth Ave
- current route of 95
- Kent Ridge Crescent
- Clementi Rd
- AYE
- Clementi Ave 6
- C'wealth Ave West
- Clementi Ave 2
- Clementi Ave 5
- Clementi Ave 4 (No Stop)
- Clementi Ave 3
- C'wealth Ave West
- Clementi Ave 6
- AYE
- Clementi Rd
- Kent Ridge Crescent
- current 95 route towards Holland Dr
62Punggol - Marina Centre
- Current route
- Crawford Rd
- Beach Rd
- Bras Basah Rd
- Temasek Blvd
- Temasek Ave
How about merging 95 and 96, such that 95 becomes Buona Vista -- Clementi (on cirrent 96 operating hours) and 95M loops around at Kent Ridge?
Agree that 62 should just terminate at Lor 1.
Originally posted by AJQZC:How about merging 95 and 96, such that 95 becomes Buona Vista -- Clementi (on cirrent 96 operating hours) and 95M loops around at Kent Ridge?
Agree that 62 should just terminate at Lor 1.
Great,LTA can reuse 96 to other route from Toa Payoh or even Eunos then.
I think Svc 308 can be improved.
So my suggestion is to convert this service to 308W / G
Will benefit residents who lives along Ave 3 (Btwn Ave 1 and Way) which only serve by Svc 975 towards CCK Int
308G -
373 (SK to Fernvale)
via
Anchorvale St
Fernvale St
Fernvale Rd
Fernvale Link
Compassvale St
370 (SK to Anchorvale)
via
Anchorvale St
Anchorvale Link
Anchorvale Dr
Originally posted by AJQZC:How about merging 95 and 96, such that 95 becomes Buona Vista -- Clementi (on cirrent 96 operating hours) and 95M loops around at Kent Ridge?
Agree that 62 should just terminate at Lor 1.
95M to loop from Clementi or BV?
Commonwealth Ave West is a busy road, the extended journey could may the arrival time more unpredictable. For short shuttle bus service, one probably travel from BV and Clementi to KR, one won't rely on this amended service to travel between BV and Clementi, thus a short and predictable time is utmost important.
Moreover, the amended service had removed the bus stop os Blk 12 Holland Drive, many BV residents and commuters board and alight at this bus stop [and make transfer].
Lastly, unlike 96, 95 serves the NUH and Science Parks 1/2 as well, amended service must not follow the bus timing/deployment of 96.
Originally posted by AJQZC:How about merging 95 and 96, such that 95 becomes Buona Vista -- Clementi (on cirrent 96 operating hours) and 95M loops around at Kent Ridge?
Agree that 62 should just terminate at Lor 1.
Actually not a bad idea to merge 95 and 96, may help to balance out the loadings especially where only svc 95 runs (ie. people can board from both sides of Lower Kent Ridge Rd since either way would lead to a MRT station, unlike now where one direction heads to Kent Ridge Terminal, which may not be useful for too many people). Such a combined route could be called svc 96 (so that the existing 96A/B services do not need to change names), and then yeah the freed up number 95 can be used for a Eunos svc (joining 93 and 94) ...
Originally posted by iamgoondu:95M to loop from Clementi or BV?
Commonwealth Ave West is a busy road, the extended journey could may the arrival time more unpredictable. For short shuttle bus service, one probably travel from BV and Clementi to KR, one won't rely on this amended service to travel between BV and Clementi, thus a short and predictable time is utmost important.
Moreover, the amended service had removed the bus stop os Blk 12 Holland Drive, many BV residents and commuters board and alight at this bus stop [and make transfer].
Lastly, unlike 96, 95 serves the NUH and Science Parks 1/2 as well, amended service must not follow the bus timing/deployment of 96.
Agree on the Holland Drive (and perhaps Holland Rd) bus stop transfers. Such a combined route can start from Clementi so the existing loop around Holland Village can be kept ...
As for Science Parks 1/2, svc 95 doesn't really serve it (svc 92/183 serves them instead), and most people visit NUH by MRT from what I have observed so no worries there either ... I can see though how it may be useful to be able to get from Clementi MRT all the way to the Faculty of Science/NUH area with a single bus ride though!
Route Extension of Service 103 to Sembawang
- Enhances connectivity in Sembawang town and Yishun
- Alternative service for 965 at Yishun Ave 7
- To be implemented with 117 amendment (below)
Link: http://routes.one/idea/173
Route Extension of Service 117 to Woodlands
- Enhances connectivity between Woodlands and Sembawang
- To be implemented with 103 amendment (above)
Originally posted by orange28:Actually not a bad idea to merge 95 and 96, may help to balance out the loadings especially where only svc 95 runs (ie. people can board from both sides of Lower Kent Ridge Rd since either way would lead to a MRT station, unlike now where one direction heads to Kent Ridge Terminal, which may not be useful for too many people). Such a combined route could be called svc 96 (so that the existing 96A/B services do not need to change names), and then yeah the freed up number 95 can be used for a Eunos svc (joining 93 and 94) ...
93 is under Bt Merah Package,Only 90 & 94 is Serangoon-Eunos.
Originally posted by Ajen:I think Svc 308 can be improved.
So my suggestion is to convert this service to 308W / G
Will benefit residents who lives along Ave 3 (Btwn Ave 1 and Way) which only serve by Svc 975 towards CCK Int
308G -
- CCK Int
- CCK Dr
- CCK Ave 1
- Keat Hong Link
- CCK Grove
- CCK Ave 7
- CCK Ave 1
- CCK Ave 3
- CCK Way
- CCK Int
308W -
- CCK Int
- CCK Way
- CCK Ave 3
- CCK Ave 1
- CCK Ave 7
- CCK Grove
- Keat Hong Link
- CCK Ave 1
- CCK Drive
- CCK int
this is actually a good idea.. 308 now still running empty (kind of)
What ever the bus service network lta still not working for the moment and the bus service still planning on are Weaste route
Originally posted by Vampire77lim:What ever the bus service network lta still not working for the moment and the bus service still planning on are Weaste route
LTA Can't afford to provide bus network
Originally posted by SMB5007J:this is actually a good idea.. 308 now still running empty (kind of)
Yup and most residents along Ave 3 are relying 975 alone which are always pack during peak hours either from opp cck mrt bustop or bustops along ave 3 towards cck int.
Originally posted by Ajen:Yup and most residents along Ave 3 are relying 975 alone which are always pack during peak hours either from opp cck mrt bustop or bustops along ave 3 towards cck int.
Most ave 3 residents take svc 300 in AM to CCK MRT given that svc 300 frequency is 02-03 mins. Better than waiting for 975 and travel time is only 05 mins more.
In PM, it is a bigger challenge.
Originally posted by Ajen:Yup and most residents along Ave 3 are relying 975 alone which are always pack during peak hours either from opp cck mrt bustop or bustops along ave 3 towards cck int.
There was 300 G/W proposed which would have been excellent for ave 3 residents, but was withdrawn as residents wanted link between ave 5 and ave 2, which was taken away with this change.
117
Punggol Interchange
Punggol Central
Punggol Way
Seletar Circus
SAP
Yishun Ave 1
Yishun Ave 2
Canberra Link
Sembawang Way
Gambas Ave
Woodlands Dr 9
Woodlands Dr 4
Woodlands Dr 7
Woodlands Interchange
* Route duplicates svc 858 from Sembawang MRT to Woodlands Interchange to provide alternative for the super unreliable 858
* Direct connection for Woodlands North residents to Yishun town, SAP, Seletar Circus and Punggol
With the above change, 858 can become Woodlands <> Changi Airport via ave 7 without going to Woodlands North.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:117
Punggol Interchange
Punggol Central
Punggol Way
Seletar Circus
SAP
Yishun Ave 1
Yishun Ave 2
Canberra Link
Sembawang Way
Gambas Ave
Woodlands Dr 9
Woodlands Dr 4
Woodlands Dr 7
Woodlands Interchange
* Route duplicates svc 858 from Sembawang MRT to Woodlands Interchange to provide alternative for the super unreliable 858
* Direct connection for Woodlands North residents to Yishun town, SAP, Seletar Circus and Punggol
With the above change, 858 can become Woodlands <> Changi Airport via ave 7 without going to Woodlands North.
Why not just go straight using Ave 9 then Ave 2.. Provide alternative also for RP Students...
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:There was 300 G/W proposed which would have been excellent for ave 3 residents, but was withdrawn as residents wanted link between ave 5 and ave 2, which was taken away with this change.
300G/W was planned to ply Ave 2, not Ave 3. 301 was the feeder for Ave 3.
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:Why not just go straight using Ave 9 then Ave 2.. Provide alternative also for RP Students...
Because my suggestion is to make 858 more direct via ave 7 to Woodlands rather than winding around Tampines North. 117 will cover for 858's missing link.
If 858 has to stay as it is, then 117 will have (2) changes
1. Go via Woodlands Ave 10 instead of Gambas
2. Do Republic Poly and ave 2 to Woodlands, future Tampines North MRT rather than ave 4.