SMB5038U SMB5039S SMB5047T
>> AMDEP SP
Originally posted by SMB315C:SMB5038U SMB5039S SMB5047T
>> AMDEP SP
So what bus replace svc 190 & 972 then?B9TL?
Originally posted by carbikebus:So what bus replace svc 190 & 972 then?B9TL?
They would need 13 B9TLs for 190 & 972 registered to replace their bendy buses which is scrapping next month :)
Originally posted by TPS Timothy Mok:They would need 13 B9TLs for 190 & 972 registered to replace their bendy buses which is scrapping next month :)
Think 122 A95 & 15 E500 is enough to cover those retiring bendies..They also got 98 B9TL...Furthermore they have 11 svc lesser.
spotted SBS9653H operating on svc 23.
5119Y perm 172? Sometimes on 983 tho..
Sgwiki svc 167 - 190 page getting rly messy recently..
Originally posted by SMB3163D:5119Y perm 172? Sometimes on 983 tho..
Sgwiki svc 167 - 190 page getting rly messy recently..
SG5119Y is definitely a spare bus..
Originally posted by TIB 585L:506
Full SLBP to Partial SL/BN
SBS6805G on 506 today (BN 225G)
SBS6737U on 225G today (SL 506)
Getting ready for BCM i guess,506 under Bedok Package
Originally posted by carbikebus:Getting ready for BCM i guess,506 under Bedok Package
No. to make space for 247/248.
Originally posted by SMB3163D:5119Y perm 172? Sometimes on 983 tho..
Sgwiki svc 167 - 190 page getting rly messy recently..
There was a period of time when 5119Y keep doing 172.
I agree that this page is getting messier.People had been saying 5801K perm 190 and 115M perm 172 when it is actually a false info .
Originally posted by SMB3163D:5119Y perm 172? Sometimes on 983 tho..
Sgwiki svc 167 - 190 page getting rly messy recently..
SGwiki messy already.. as what user SG5064X mentioned, SG5119Y did 172 quite regularly last few months, rotating duties with the rest of the 172 perms (got one week i took the bus everyday on 172-172-4).. but will do 983 at times so i guess status is still SP based in BUDEP...
At most suspect perm only..still need observe but then nowadays some SMRT buses dun perm anymore, working like TT and GA...
Guys I've combined Svc 979 and 979M together in Sgwiki and there is a little error.Pls help me to edit the minor changes.Thanks
Originally posted by SG5064X:Guys I've combined Svc 979 and 979M together in Sgwiki and there is a little error.Pls help me to edit the minor changes.Thanks
Like that 903M/912M also must combine
Originally posted by carbikebus:Like that 903M/912M also must combine
Does it share fleet with its parent service first?
Originally posted by SG5064X:Does it share fleet with its parent service first?
Most of the M variants interline with its parent svc except 53M
Originally posted by SG5064X:Does it share fleet with its parent service first?
903 yes. 912 no.
SBS8681H HGDEP 103 > HGDEP SP
SG1151D HGDEP SP > HGDEP 103
Originally posted by carbikebus:Like that 903M/912M also must combine
agreed.. wiki rly getting v messy
Originally posted by carbikebus:Like that 903M/912M also must combine
Wanted to merge 912 & 912M together.. But 912 listed under Intra-Town while 912M under Feeder..
Originally posted by SMB315C:Wanted to merge 912 & 912M together.. But 912 listed under Intra-Town while 912M under Feeder..
903 & 903M?
Originally posted by carbikebus:903 & 903M?
User SMB315C had merged it already and I make both Svc WAB since it was stated as 903 is NWAB while 903M was WAB.