What svcs should get double decks or Bendies during peak hr?
-
For me, I think it's
Tibs services 167, 171, 855 and 857 daily. -
i think bus 95 that serves the NUS community should at least have a double-decker due to the crowd every morning during term time......
-
Originally posted by NeonTetra:
Service 95 is unable to use double deckers, i believe, due to the small roads along NUS/NUH.
i think [b]bus 95 that serves the NUS community should at least have a double-decker due to the crowd every morning during term time......[/b] -
Hi
I think service 334 should use superbus. It is always very pack during peak hour from 6pm to as late a 10pm. The whole batch of service 334 bus now are mercedes O405.
I think sbst should consider deploying superbus on sv334 during peak hr like service 242. It got 2 superbus during morning peak and sometime 2 to 3 superbus in the evening peak. Sometime even got superbus on sat and sun normal hours. -
Hi small road can use VO 2 axle. -
Service 156.
-
It's due to the trees at Sixth Ave that they cannot deploy double deckers.Originally posted by 798:Service 156. -
Ohh, I see... -
How can service 167 uses bendy? (Sembawang Rd End terminal cannot accomodate bendy) Unless you are talking about short-working trips.Originally posted by off_service:For me, I think it's
Tibs services 167, 171, 855 and 857 daily. -
Originally posted by NeonTetra:
Cannot. There is a height restriction of 4.0m (an overpass) along Lower Kent Ridge Rd.
i think [b]bus 95 that serves the NUS community should at least have a double-decker due to the crowd every morning during term time......[/b] -
Chop off the trees.Originally posted by off_service:It's due to the trees at Sixth Ave that they cannot deploy double deckers.
Then service 156 can uses double deckers. -
I would like to see services 100, 145 and 195 using double deckers (provided there's no height restrictions)
Does anyone knows why the Superbuses on service 139 were withdrawn? Is it due to the narrow roads along the way or low passenger load? -
Also, service 26, why were the Superbuses withdrawn?
-
Service 852 should get Bendys. The Lances and DAFs are filled beyond bursting point every day by students from 0630-0730. It is able to operate Bendys. The Bendy can come from service 61 or 106, and it is perfectly okay to park a Bendy in Yishun berths for loading...857 does that every 12 minutes on Sundays, and the bus can just terminate at the side berths at Bt Batok and return to their original services at the end of the trip. But I still prefer my TIB1186Z if possible, but I know that's a bit on the far side
-
Svc 105!!!
-
Cannot be done. Double-decks cannot go along Sixth Ave(supposedly). Sv. 167 cannot have O405Gs due to Sembawang Rd End terminal.Originally posted by 798:Service 156. -
Sv. 105 cannot have double-decks due to height restriction at the slip road from Braddell Rd to Lor Chuan, 3.9m under the CTE. Sv. 105 used to have double-decks when it plied Bishan MRT.Originally posted by Zilchster:Svc 105!!! -
LoL!!Originally posted by tranquilice:Chop off the trees. Then service 156 can uses double deckers.
Eh... you can ask NParks for the opinions....
-
Well, the bus can U-turn there as someone saw before. But I agree that letting the bus park there will be inconvenient for motorists.Originally posted by tranquilice:How can service 167 uses bendy? (Sembawang Rd End terminal cannot accomodate bendy) Unless you are talking about short-working trips.
I hope there will be a 167A between Sembawang MRT to Orchard Road and back during peak hours. -
think that Bridge can tear down lah.............hahaOriginally posted by tranquilice:Cannot. There is a height restriction of 4.0m (an overpass) along Lower Kent Ridge Rd. -
Let us sign an online petition and submit to NParks, "pressure" NParks to chop all the trees down along 6th Ave, then SBST will has no more reason not to deploy double deckers on service 156.Originally posted by off_service:LoL!!
Eh... you can ask NParks for the opinions.... -
They can and always say that the current fleet is able to meet the demands and thus, no need for double decks on the service.Originally posted by tranquilice:Let us sign an online petition and submit to NParks, "pressure" NParks to chop all the trees down along 6th Ave, then SBST will has no more reason not to deploy double deckers on service 156. -
Originally posted by NeonTetra:think that Bridge can tear down lah.............haha
Please send your feedback to NUS Office of Estates and Developments. -
Do you think the current fleet of service 156 can cope with the demand?Originally posted by off_service:They can and always say that the current fleet is able to meet the demands and thus, no need for double decks on the service. -
I had not taken svc 156 for a long time. Well, they always claim it is when people complain abt insufficient buses or need high cap buses.Originally posted by tranquilice:Do you think the current fleet of service 156 can cope with the demand?