Originally posted by SBS3688Y:
Since tibs has only bendy buses and SBST double-deckers to serve higher capacity routes, why not split the routes according to the individual route situation instead of terrority?
For example, service 96 and 156 could not deploy double-deckers due to height restriction. So why not both companies exchange the route operations? Maybe SBST can operate services 190,851,960 using double-deckers instead???
Wahahahhahahahhahhaha
Interesting and rather innovative idea, but TIBS would definitely not give up 190,851 or 960 for anything, those routes are very huge moneytrees that they shake everyday and earn like crazy.
156 may not be bendy-able either - I dont know if Sixth Ave or the U-Turn at Bt Timah Road is bendy-friendly.