Seriously, I don't think the 5 services were in any sort of duplication or anywhere near the NEL stations.Originally posted by Zilchster:Heya,
Did anyone of u ppl read today straits times article in the home section on the trip software...quite interesting
More interestingly, it turned out that Transitlink wanted to amend the services of 80, 100, 73, 155 and 641...but were rejected...never expected 73 and 155 to be on the cards as well..gee...
Thank goodness 73 is not taken away...
Just my guess what the proposed amendments are:Originally posted by Zilchster:Heya,
Did anyone of u ppl read today straits times article in the home section on the trip software...quite interesting
More interestingly, it turned out that Transitlink wanted to amend the services of 80, 100, 73, 155 and 641...but were rejected...never expected 73 and 155 to be on the cards as well..gee...
Thank goodness 73 is not taken away...
Service 56 may be extended as the current route is short.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Phase 3 of rationalization where services not duplicating NEL would be amended, perhaps? Sv. 56 was also mentioned, SBST wanted it to follow Sv. 851 route till Middle Rd I think.
Yes, only 12 fare stages in all, one of the shorter trunk services for SBST. Unless they want to extend it to Shenton Way or HarbourFront to chalk up passengers from town going to Bishan and TPY, as the loads on Sv. 56 can be pathetic at times, especially at night.Originally posted by tranquilice:Service 56 may be extended as the current route is short.