SBST intended to place 2-axle VOs on Sv. 151 but I think there was some problems over at NUS campus roads so it was scrapped.Originally posted by foxtrot1985:not to forget 151 too
What about service 94?Originally posted by th1988:SBS has said that with the opening of the Toa Payoh Aircon interchange in 2001, all services would be converted to FAC services.
But service 90 is left as a NAC service. But, 231 also have a very low demand is allowed as a FAC service and 90 NAC with overloaded trips during the afternoon peak.
Is this fair to SAF personnal taking service 90 daily to and fro PLAB.
It reminds me of Townlink 265. In 1996, I read the papers that Townlink 265 would be implemented. However, this integration of former services 265 and 266 happened only when the temporary Ang Mo Kio Int opened. Also, many proposed Townlink services did not turn into reality.Originally posted by th1988:Well, service 94 has this problem of using B10M (1st batch).
Actually, I got a reply from SBS regarding 90, they told me AC buses would be introduced in phrases, I don't know whether would they keep to their promise.
AFAIK they hardly ever keep their promises, doing so only when some important person kicks up a fuss.Originally posted by off_service:It reminds me of Townlink 265. In 1996, I read the papers that Townlink 265 would be implemented. However, this integration of former services 265 and 266 happened only when the temporary Ang Mo Kio Int opened. Also, many proposed Townlink services did not turn into reality.