Withdrawal of these services will only lead to more complaints from the residents. Without these services, Sembawang will only have one mode of public transport, MRT.Originally posted by alantanchunshyan:do u all think there will be any amendment or withdrawal of tibs 167,169,856,859,962,980,981 after sembawang bus interchange is completed and in full operation??
Here's my suggestion:Originally posted by alantanchunshyan:do u all think there will be any amendment or withdrawal of tibs 167,169,856,859,962,980,981 after sembawang bus interchange is completed and in full operation??
How I wish service 169 can be amended back to the good old days till March 1996, when service 169 serves Canberra Road.Originally posted by service_238:Here's my suggestion:
167: Amendment to call at Interchange. It is more or less the same as Svc 82 - bypassing town centre before terminating at the Rd End. For Svc 82's case, it loops there
169 & 856: No Change
859 & 962: Terminate @SBW Int
980: Amend to ply from SBW Int. Might be a possibilty that it could ply- SBW Int, Canberra Rd, Admiralty Rd East, Sembawang Rd onwards.
981: Terminate @SBW Int instead of SBW MRT.
If SBW population grows, feeder services might be introduced.
i also like 169 to admend to serve canberra rd instead.more sembawang residents can take 169 to ang mo kio and yishun etc .also it helps because 856 is usually jam near woodlands checkpoint towards yishun bus interchange direction especially in the afternoon and night times during weekends and commutors have to wait up to 45 minutes and 856 still did not turn up.so a bus 169 at canberra rd will convenient sembawang resient to take 169 to yishun bus interchange if 856 does not turn up.Originally posted by off_service:How I wish service 169 can be amended back to the good old days till March 1996, when service 169 serves Canberra Road.
can the two terminals operate at the same time together with sembawng bus interchange?Originally posted by service_238:Here's my suggestion:
167: Amendment to call at Interchange. It is more or less the same as Svc 82 - bypassing town centre before terminating at the Rd End. For Svc 82's case, it loops there
169 & 856: No Change
859 & 962: Terminate @SBW Int
980: Amend to ply from SBW Int. Might be a possibilty that it could ply- SBW Int, Canberra Rd, Admiralty Rd East, Sembawang Rd onwards.
981: Terminate @SBW Int instead of SBW
If SBW population grows, feeder services might be introduced.
I don't think Tibs will want that.Originally posted by alantanchunshyan:can the two terminals operate at the same time together with sembawng bus interchange?
Actually quite pointless. Unless you want the case of Bukit Merah and Rumah Tinggi, of course. Or even HG South and HG Central.Originally posted by alantanchunshyan:can the two terminals operate at the same time together with sembawng bus interchange?
if its true,it will be good news for sembawang and east residents.Originally posted by carbikebus:heard some info or rumours from inside that sbst is planning to amended a service from the east maybe to terminate at sembawang int,don't know whether is it true or just a hoax.maybe have to wait for next year to confirm this. next year,probably in apr i will be joining either TIBS or SBS Transit as a bus captains or inspector,any suggestion which is better,disadvantages or advantages and benefits?