When did u take the bus or what time did you notice this at the Interchange? I could enlighten u on this by telling u the frequency of the service at that time and its demand.Originally posted by skyline_05:service 238... i hab sumting to complain abt this particular bus..it is always so freaking crowded..n the frequency durinf off-peak hrs is freaking long when dere r many ppl
3693 is a 'peak hour' bus on weekdays. It doesnt operate from morning till night. This bus usually starts at 0600, ends its morning run @0900 before returning to bram. Just before noon, it'll come out again for its afternoon and evening peak runs before returning to the depot @1900+.Originally posted by th1988:I took 3722 at around 1150 on 238
Also something weird happened today, 3693 and some other buses came out from HQ without the 238 desto. It came one after another. What happened?
Also 3652 on 238 today as well.
But Sv. 28 buses from BRAM operate with desto inside, and it also plies Braddell Rd stop. So that argument is somewhat invalid.Originally posted by service_238:3693 is a 'peak hour' bus on weekdays. It doesnt operate from morning till night. This bus usually starts at 0600, ends its morning run @0900 before returning to bram. Just before noon, it'll come out again for its afternoon and evening peak runs before returning to the depot @1900+.
There is another 'peak hour' bus. This bus is SBS 3680 T for today - 26th Jan. Similar to 3693, it operates at around the same time with the exception that this bus goes back to bram @1130 and goes back into service at 1520.
If u're free read its timesheet to find out more.![]()
As for other buses, i reckon there're buses of 28 143 145. 3693 had to run w/o its desto because 238 serves one bus stop along braddell rd, just after the bram exit. If the desto is put up, people would mistaken that its in service when its not.
Are those service 28 buses in operation?Originally posted by SBS9818A:But Sv. 28 buses from BRAM operate with desto inside, and it also plies Braddell Rd stop. So that argument is somewhat invalid.
No. Once they come out of BRAM, they turn into Braddell Rd, turn into Lor 6, then left into Lor 1.Originally posted by tranquilice:Are those service 28 buses in operation?
But as mentioned in the earlier post, these buses do have front and side desto on, passengers may flag thinking that the bus is not off service.Originally posted by SBS9818A:No. Once they come out of BRAM, they turn into Braddell Rd, turn into Lor 6, then left into Lor 1.
Not like the driver will stop for them anyway.Originally posted by tranquilice:But as mentioned in the earlier post, these buses do have front and side desto on, passengers may flag thinking that the bus is not off service.
So the buses actually zoom past the stops with the desto on? Not scared of complaints?Originally posted by SBS9818A:Not like the driver will stop for them anyway.
Usually those buses will use the entire Lor 6 stretch towards TPY.Originally posted by SBS9818A:No. Once they come out of BRAM, they turn into Braddell Rd, turn into Lor 6, then left into Lor 1.
Yes, its term time. Sv. 238 need SOME double-decks!Originally posted by service_238:Ever since the new weekday timesheet for 238 was out, there has been LONG queues at the 238 berth right up to the transitlink ticket office. I wonder whether is there an increase in passenger demand, or the buses are becoming infrequent? I double checked with the old timesheet and found out that there's no change in the frequency and the departure times of the service... I think its term time.![]()
AGAIN?Originally posted by service_238:New 238 weekday timesheet with effect from 9th Feb 2004.
It applies to the crossover buses as well.![]()
26 has also revised its timesheet WEF 9/2. But the timings are the same.Originally posted by th1988:It's because 3720L has it's timetable changed as of fleet changes on 90.
So, they have to change 238 timetable as well.
That would be nice!Originally posted by leeJZ:Maybe they can hurl the VO 3axles on Sv 291 over?![]()
Not very likely.Originally posted by leeJZ:Maybe they can hurl the VO 3axles on Sv 291 over?![]()
Would be nice though. Some VO 2 axles would be enough for Sv 291. Why did it even get 3 axles anyway?Originally posted by SBS9818A:Not very likely.
to replace the VO2x as they migrated to soon lee in sept 2003.Originally posted by leeJZ:Would be nice though. Some VO 2 axles would be enough for Sv 291. Why did it even get 3 axles anyway?
BNDEP doesn't have any more VO2X as all have been x-ferred to SLBP. Sv. 291 used to operate VO2X, BTW.Originally posted by leeJZ:Would be nice though. Some VO 2 axles would be enough for Sv 291. Why did it even get 3 axles anyway?