Time to review the rule.Originally posted by pkcheah100:According to the PTC website
At least 95% of trips from one point to another should involve not more than 1 inter-trunk or trunk/MRT transfer (excluding feeder transfers). (source:http://www.ptc.gov.sg/bus_servstandards.html)
With all the admendment and removal of duplicates for NEL and recent bus changes due to the closure of Hougang south Interchange, do you think that the PTC have effectively enforce this rule?
Forgot, added in.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Don't forget Sv. 28, one BIG round around Tampines.
Very soon you're going to say 90.Originally posted by th1988:Also 8, making a round before getting to Temasek.
Originally posted by tranquilice:Ya... full of "go round the world" bus Dont' forget...166 143..... I think the new service (113 112 ) also.
Also from the PTC website:
[b]# Route should be direct and avoid circuitous routings. Route should not be more than 30% longer in distance than comparative trips by car. Generally, there should be no more than 2 branches per trunk route.Services 3, 14, 28, 38, 51, 112, 123, 800, 811, 812 etc.
[/b]
And the notorious Sv. 61Originally posted by pkcheah100:Ya... full of "go round the world" bus Dont' forget...166 143..... I think the new service (113 112 ) also.![]()
Service 143 is only winding in Teban/Pandan Gdns.Originally posted by pkcheah100:Ya... full of "go round the world" bus Dont' forget...166 143..... I think the new service (113 112 ) also.![]()
Nope, the Orchard Rd and Chinatown sectors too.Originally posted by tranquilice:Service 143 is only winding in Teban/Pandan Gdns.
In my opinion, it is not winding in these 2 sectors.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Nope, the Orchard Rd and Chinatown sectors too.
Circuitous from Alexandra to Chinatown. Also ending in Hougang via Eunos is another example.Originally posted by service_238:In what way is Svc 51 circuitious? I think it used to bypass IKEA before SMRT Rationalisation. That explains the big round in the queenstown area.
Because it goes by Geylang and city areas to get to Jurong, when Sv. 165, in comparison, goes by the suburbs.Originally posted by service_238:In what way is Svc 51 circuitious? I think it used to bypass IKEA before SMRT Rationalisation. That explains the big round in the queenstown area.
hellooo.. dun forget ppl need to go MRT along queensway lor..Originally posted by service_238:In what way is Svc 51 circuitious? I think it used to bypass IKEA before SMRT Rationalisation. That explains the big round in the queenstown area.
The former service 192 operated between Jurong interchange and South Canal terminal.Originally posted by xin1jun2:hellooo.. dun forget ppl need to go MRT along queensway lor..
anyhow 51 is ex 192 AFIC
and 192 did go that route...
ZYX
Where's the exact place of the former Jurong Interchange?Originally posted by tranquilice:The former service 192 operated between Jurong interchange and South Canal terminal.
Junction of Jln Ahmad Ibrahim and Jurong Port Rd. Also the location of the former Jurong Bus Park. Jurong Depot was located at Penjuru Rd, next to Teban Gardens.Originally posted by service_238:Where's the exact place of the former Jurong Interchange?
It's not winding in my opinion.Originally posted by foxtrot1985:156 from Macritchie to Bukit Timah Rd too...
In the Novena/Balestier Area. It's purpose was to link Novena Stn to McNair Estate and McNair Estate to Kallang Stn.Originally posted by th1988:How abt sv 21?