Services 62, 82, 107 and 119
-
Isn't that I have been saying abt as SKG was the first to get FAC feeder svs!
But as it is now under Ctrl, you may never know as they are trying to rotate the NAC CRBs like at HQ. -
Quite true.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Sv. 82 will not because it passes through SBST favourite territory. -
Like what 9818 said, the NAC CRBs can ply anywhere except Sengkang.Originally posted by th1988:Isn't that I have been saying abt as SKG was the first to get FAC feeder svs!
But as it is now under Ctrl, you may never know as they are trying to rotate the NAC CRBs like at HQ. -
Wait and see aproach as 82 is now under Ctrl.
-
We shall wait and see.Originally posted by th1988:Wait and see aproach as 82 is now under Ctrl.
-
No matter what SBST will not deploy NAC buses in their favourite territory.Originally posted by th1988:Wait and see aproach as 82 is now under Ctrl. -
Don't forget when 87 was introduced, it was PAC.
-
Same goes for 88. I remembered when i first took 88 from Catholic High to TPY, it was a NAC Scania. The pax was full seating cap. (no one was standing)Originally posted by th1988:Don't forget when 87 was introduced, it was PAC. -
Are you sure? I thought 87 and 88 are fully air-con when first introduced.
-
Nope. i'm not sure abt 87 but 88 was PAC when it was first introduced. It gradually phrased out its NAC CRBs on the fleet and replaced by the 96xx VOs in late-1999.Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:Are you sure? I thought 87 and 88 are fully air-con when first introduced.
-
Yes, 87 was intially a PAC sv as I remembered seeing a notice "Conversion of Service 87 to FAC wef Dec 1999", it was barely 2 mths aft it was introduced. And on the e guide at that time was PAC.
-
Sv. 88 was PAC. It had NAC N113CRBs. As the 96xx VOs were introduced towards late 1999 they were removed. Interestingly these VOs were from BNDEP but have since been x-ferred to AMDEP when the former gave up control of Sv. 88Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:Are you sure? I thought 87 and 88 are fully air-con when first introduced. -
Actually most new services are PAC as they do not know whether are there high demands.
Some examples are
3
38
60
87
88
179
182
This is because not only because of unsure but just that the frequency if less than 10 mins or serving e way
39, 161 are such examples as there is a PTC ruling that services with more than 13 mins should be FAC. This is a easier ruling than before 1997 when it was mandatory. -
Among those services Sv. 88 was the only one serving an expressway originally.Originally posted by th1988:Actually most new services are PAC as they do not know whether are there high demands.
Some examples are
3
38
60
87
88
179
182
This is because not only because of unsure but just that the frequency if less than 10 mins or serving e way
39, 161 are such examples as there is a PTC ruling that services with more than 13 mins should be FAC. This is a easier ruling than before 1997 when it was mandatory. -
Not forgetting 23 53 81.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Among those services Sv. 88 was the only one serving an expressway originally.
After that trunk services serving the expressway has become a norm.
i.e 27 39 86 89 161 168 858 965 966 969 985 and the defunked 989 -
How can you forget services 24, 30, 36, 187, 190, 700, 857, 960, 963 and others?Originally posted by service_238:Not forgetting 23 53 81.
After that trunk services serving the expressway has become a norm.
i.e 27 39 86 89 161 168 858 965 966 969 985 and the defunked 989 -
Service 88 was PAC when introduced in Feb 1999. 2.5 months later (May 1999), it was converted to FAC.
-
It serves the expressway as it has no alternative route between Sengkang and Pasir Ris.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Among those services Sv. 88 was the only one serving an expressway originally. -
I was thinking of the TPE thenOriginally posted by tranquilice:How can you forget services 24, 30, 36, 187, 190, 700, 857, 960, 963 and others?
-
190, 700 and 960 don't ply highway ah?Originally posted by service_238:Not forgetting 23 53 81.
After that trunk services serving the expressway has become a norm.
i.e 27 39 86 89 161 168 858 965 966 969 985 and the defunked 989 -
But 989 got pass TPE meh?Originally posted by service_238:I was thinking of the TPE then
Cheers and warm regards -
There's of course a few exceptions like 966 985 989 in my list. lolOriginally posted by Superbus:But 989 got pass TPE meh?
Cheers and warm regards -
Originally posted by service_238:I was thinking of the TPE then
What's so interesting about TPE? -
It links the east and north east to the north.Originally posted by tranquilice: What's so interesting about TPE? -
My english is really bad.Originally posted by service_238:It links the east and north east to the north.