Now that's true. I sleep best on Sv. 969, but it must be a O405G with strong a/c though. Fell asleep on TIB1193C once.Originally posted by tranquilice:In my opinion, in the whole of SBST fleets, VSO seats are the most un-comfortable! The seats are very hard, high and the back-rest is more backwards. I was onboard 9800A on Wednesday for 1.5 hours and had to keep changing seats.
Another who agree that VSOs are un-comfortable to be in.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Now that's true. I sleep best on Sv. 969, but it must be a O405G with strong a/c though. Fell asleep on TIB1193C once.
One thing about VSOs i'd love to comment is the flat floor on the sides of the upper deck. It makes my foot feel more comfortable. LOs VOs and Tridents' floor are curved like a gutter on the sides. This makes my foot feel vv uncomfortable.Originally posted by tranquilice:Another who agree that VSOs are un-comfortable to be in.![]()
VSO should also be known as the excursion bus. Why? Which other public buses has reclining seats?Originally posted by TIB1186Z:I always fall asleep on a VSO "long-haul" ie svc 161 and 168. The seats on the upper deck and in the middle is the quietest, and with the strong A/C and reclining seats with high pitch, it is perfect for sleeping!!!
In my opinion, I feel that tridents are worser than LOs and VOs, in term of the above-mentioned.Originally posted by service_238:One thing about VSOs i'd love to comment is the flat floor on the sides of the upper deck. It makes my foot feel more comfortable. LOs VOs and Tridents' floor are curved like a gutter on the sides. This makes my foot feel vv uncomfortable.
In my opinion, tridents should not be dumped, they are good buses and are rare with only 20 units.Originally posted by leeJZ:So SBS has chosen the VSO over the Trident, maybe they should dump the Trident since they only have some 20 examples? Just like airlines - less types in the fleet
BTW not to say I dont like the Tridents...they're not bad![]()
Yes, SBST should buy more tridents.Originally posted by SBS9818A:I'd rather SBST buy in more Tridents and dump the VSOs though. IMO, Tridents are the quietest DDs to grace Singapore roads. Coming second is the 96-series VOs.
They should buy more of both. Both are almost equally ranked for me, tridents being the fact that the last row is often too hot for comfort,as well as the very hard and straight seats...i relax on the bus, not train my posture!!!. They are low floor , zero step buses that should be the way city double decks in the future as Singapore's population grows older and the govt. try to make Singapore more handicap friendly.Originally posted by tranquilice:Yes, SBST should buy more tridents.
Originally posted by SBS9818A:Have u ever heard the one and only SBS Scania BR1120H(SBS7000E)NAC DD with East Lancs body before?
[ IMO, Tridents are the quietest DDs to grace Singapore roads. Coming second is the 96-series VOs.[/b]
Yeah that's true, forgot about this guy.Originally posted by BlessingSatan:Have u ever heard the one and only SBS Scania BR1120H(SBS7000E)NAC DD with East Lancs body before?
I feel that is the quietest DD ever to grace SG road,Even more quietest than its single deck brothers the NAC CRBs.![]()
Totally agreed that the seats are very hard but I don't mind the design of the seat just remove the cushion.Originally posted by tranquilice:In my opinion, in the whole of SBST fleets, VSO seats are the most un-comfortable! The seats are very hard, high and the back-rest is more backwards. I was onboard 9800A on Wednesday for 1.5 hours and had to keep changing seats.
Totally agreed that the seats are very hard but I don't mind the design of the seat just remove the cushion.Originally posted by tranquilice:In my opinion, in the whole of SBST fleets, VSO seats are the most un-comfortable! The seats are very hard, high and the back-rest is more backwards. I was onboard 9800A on Wednesday for 1.5 hours and had to keep changing seats.
I agree that VSOs are slow, my ride on Sv 161 on the SLE was really slow...while the Trident on Sv 89 on the TPE could outrun any large vehicle like those big trucks, including one O405 of Sv 858...Originally posted by Scania:Totally agreed that the seats are very hard but I don't mind the design of the seat just remove the cushion.
Other bad things of the B10TLs(better not call it VSO, later got B12TL come out (lolz))
(1): Too slow(esp with the Voith), even at 60km h^-1, it sounds conspitated.
(2): B10TLs are only 10 liter buses, like most Vovlo buses only has 9.6 liter, what can you expect, even our gentle looking lovable Scania N113CRB has more than 10 liters
(3) You'll always see 858/965/969 O405s overtaking them, quite like (1)
(4) Too noisy, besides 9888Y and 9810X, they are all noise pollutants both in the interior and exterior.
(5) Noisy sounds are ok in some standard, as long as they are pleasent, but B10TLs sounds very unpleasent, even the lances having a louder blasting sound(than the radiator sound of B10TLs) sounds plesant.
Agreed.Originally posted by leeJZ:I agree that VSOs are slow, my ride on Sv 161 on the SLE was really slow...while the Trident on Sv 89 on the TPE could outrun any large vehicle like those big trucks, including one O405 of Sv 858...
But VSOs are rather quiet on the upper deck...
I get that same noise level in any Scania or Mk IV DM3500.Originally posted by leeJZ:I agree that VSOs are slow, my ride on Sv 161 on the SLE was really slow...while the Trident on Sv 89 on the TPE could outrun any large vehicle like those big trucks, including one O405 of Sv 858...
But VSOs are rather quiet on the upper deck...
Why theOriginally posted by BlessingSatan:OMG![]()
He sense more flamings are on the way.Originally posted by tranquilice:Why thelook?