190 was as pampered as 25 when it was still under SBS.Originally posted by cck_190:I'm sure if 190 is still under SBS, it would get a full fleet of VSOs and Dennis Tridents![]()
That's true, Sv. 25 got all the new VOs.Originally posted by freakybuses:190 was as pampered as 25 when it was still under SBS.
Thats because 25 got the new buses when SBS was 25 just like 28 getting new buses.....when they are 30 years old(late by 2 years, but they were kept in a serect place somewhere(can't tell) for 1 year.Originally posted by SBS9818A:That's true, Sv. 25 got all the new VOs.
According to timesheets. its 2-3min... not 1min.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Sv. 72 has frequency of 1 min! Beat that!
This doesn't explain why 25 gets so many VSOs since they were only introduced into the scene recently.Originally posted by Scania:Thats because 25 got the new buses when SBS was 25 just like 28 getting new buses.....when they are 30 years old(late by 2 years, but they were kept in a serect place somewhere(can't tell) for 1 year.
Service 25 is a "high class route" of SBST. However, I do not know what is meant by "high class route", or why it is so.Originally posted by foxtrot1985:This doesn't explain why 25 gets so many VSOs since they were only introduced into the scene recently.
Because it competes head-on with Sv. 854 from HG Ave 2 - Bedok.Originally posted by off_service:Service 25 is a "high class route" of SBST. However, I do not know what is meant by "high class route", or why it is so.
Most of the time people (including me) just take whichever bus (25 or 854) comes first... As long as I can get to my destination, I happy liao.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Because it competes head-on with Sv. 854 from HG Ave 2 - Bedok.
Same as me... If i wanna go to BDK from TPY, i simply take 966 to EUN and wait for the first bus that comes.. frankly speaking sometimes 25 has a better freq than 854.Originally posted by foxtrot1985:Most of the time people (including me) just take whichever bus (25 or 854) comes first... As long as I can get to my destination, I happy liao.
For me it's 854 -> 55, 25 -> 55/88, 854/25 -> 966 -> 56. I don't have much of a choice.Originally posted by service_238:Same as me... If i wanna go to BDK from TPY, i simply take 966 to EUN and wait for the first bus that comes.. frankly speaking sometimes 25 has a better freq than 854.
I must say that 25 has a better frequency than 854. 854's frequency is quite inconsistent.Originally posted by service_238:Same as me... If i wanna go to BDK from TPY, i simply take 966 to EUN and wait for the first bus that comes.. frankly speaking sometimes 25 has a better freq than 854.
that's true, but once the infamous Jalan Eunos jam starts, freq of both will be haywireOriginally posted by foxtrot1985:I must say that 25 has a better frequency than 854. 854's frequency is quite inconsistent.
and it's buses are also better than 854!Originally posted by foxtrot1985:I must say that 25 has a better frequency than 854. 854's frequency is quite inconsistent.
Its already good compared wif amk folks who have no proper int....temperorary...shud appreciate larOriginally posted by Scania:I, as a Toa Payoh boy for my whole life, do not agree that I've get a good interchange. Its too small(for buses), its aircon seems like no aircon(better get a colder one). In short, it is not well planned. I prefer the old Toa Payoh interchange that existed from 1987 to 1998. Its so spacious, it has lots of parking space.
Thats rite man...add 57, 58,59...hahazOriginally posted by SBS9818A:Bishan has a LACK of services!
Yeah...return 190 back to SBST! and cck too!Originally posted by cck_190:I'm sure if 190 is still under SBS, it would get a full fleet of VSOs and Dennis Tridents![]()
Not really related, Bukit Panjang Int is temporary,right?Originally posted by SBS9845X:Its already good compared wif amk folks who have no proper int....temperorary...shud appreciate lartoa payoh int rocks
It's permanent. There's no other space to build an interchange!Originally posted by cck_190:Not really related, Bukit Panjang Int is temporary,right?
I'm quite sure it's temporary.During construction, I read on the board "Proposed erection of a temporary bus interchange".Originally posted by SBS9818A:It's permanent. There's no other space to build an interchange!
There is no space for permanent interchange. I think it's here to stay.Originally posted by cck_190:I'm quite sure it's temporary.During construction, I read on the board "Proposed erection of a temporary bus interchange".
btw, the style of the interchange is of a temporary one. I think the new int will be intergrated with the future Bukit Panjang MRT station
unless it is built at the space near ten mile junction.Originally posted by SBS9818A:There is no space for permanent interchange. I think it's here to stay.
That's what I think so too...Originally posted by freakybuses:unless it is built at the space near ten mile junction.