Any feelings for any withdrawn bus service?

• freakybuses

  18 Apr 04, 23:04

  Originally posted by off_service:

  I did not even know there's B57 deployed on 166 before.

  only a minority of the fleet in 166.
• SBS9818A

  19 Apr 04, 20:56

  Originally posted by freakybuses:

  There was once when I took a Volvo B57 with my dad in December 1993 on svc 166... I was quite young then and didn't know that it was the last time I would be taking a Volvo B57... How I wished that time would turn back and cherish my good old kindergarten days on buses...

  I miss B57s on my Sv. 410!
• tranquilice

  20 Apr 04, 04:05

  Originally posted by freakybuses:

  Only one feeder svc?

  I guess so. Services 302 and 303 were introduced in 1994. Dunno about service 300.
• SBS9818A

  20 Apr 04, 16:24

  Originally posted by tranquilice:

  I guess so. Services 302 and 303 were introduced in 1994. Dunno about service 300.

  Wasn't Sv. 300 amended or something as CCK Ave 5 didn't exist back then?
• cck_190

  20 Apr 04, 19:23

  Originally posted by SBS9818A:

  Wasn't Sv. 300 amended or something as CCK Ave 5 didn't exist back then?

  Sorry, can't help.I wasn't a CCK resident back then.
• freakybuses

  20 Apr 04, 21:33

  Originally posted by cck_190:

  Sorry, can't help.I wasn't a CCK resident back then.

  then where you used to cover? still covering that area?
• cck_190

  20 Apr 04, 21:55

  Originally posted by freakybuses:

  then where you used to cover? still covering that area?

  I didn't cover any place back then as I was not yet a full-time bus fan.I became one when I moved to CCK in late '98. I used to live in Woodlands but I did not cover Woodlands area...
• tranquilice

  21 Apr 04, 03:09

  Originally posted by SBS9818A:

  Wasn't Sv. 300 amended or something as CCK Ave 5 didn't exist back then?

  I remember that service 300 was amended quite a few times and I got confused with the route.
• SBS9818A

  21 Apr 04, 15:49

  Originally posted by tranquilice:

  I remember that service 300 was amended quite a few times and I got confused with the route.

  Ah, I remember that too.
• cck_190

  21 Apr 04, 17:29

  Originally posted by tranquilice:

  I remember that service 300 was amended quite a few times and I got confused with the route.

  That part I can remember too but I don't know the route change...Time to do research @ Jurong Library Transitlink guides
• tranquilice

  22 Apr 04, 01:52

  Originally posted by cck_190:

  That part I can remember too but I don't know the route change...Time to do research @ Jurong Library Transitlink guides

  From what I can remember on service 300:
  
  CCK Int, (Loop), Ave 4, Ave 1, Ave 2, Way, (Ave 4), (Loop) and Int. CCK Int, (Loop), Ave 4, Ave 1, Ave 2, Way, Ave 3, Ave 1, Ave 4, (Loop) and Int.
  
  ( ) denotes express sector.
• BlessingSatan

  22 Apr 04, 07:48

  What about the long gone 206,Any memories or nostalgic moments?
• SBS9818A

  22 Apr 04, 15:48

  Originally posted by tranquilice:

  From what I can remember on service 300:
  
  CCK Int, (Loop), Ave 4, Ave 1, Ave 2, Way, (Ave 4), (Loop) and Int. CCK Int, (Loop), Ave 4, Ave 1, Ave 2, Way, Ave 3, Ave 1, Ave 4, (Loop) and Int.
  
  ( ) denotes express sector.

  Hmm, ok.
• tranquilice

  22 Apr 04, 23:37

  Originally posted by BlessingSatan:

  What about the long gone 206,Any memories or nostalgic moments?

  As indicated in the 1992 bus guide, service 206 operated between Boon Lay interchange and Lim Chu Kang terminal. Later, it was converted to a peak-hours-only service. It was withdrawn in 1993 or 1994. Route is the same as service 405 between Boon Lay and the junction of Lim Chu Kang Rd and Old Lim Chu Kang Rd.
• freakybuses

  23 Apr 04, 21:29

  Originally posted by tranquilice:

  As indicated in the 1992 bus guide, service 206 operated between Boon Lay interchange and Lim Chu Kang terminal. Later, it was converted to a peak-hours-only service. It was withdrawn in 1993 or 1994. Route is the same as service 405 between Boon Lay and the junction of Lim Chu Kang Rd and Old Lim Chu Kang Rd.

  Withdrawn due to very low demand eh?
• tranquilice

  23 Apr 04, 22:48

  Originally posted by freakybuses:

  Withdrawn due to very low demand eh?

  Probably.
• SBS9818A

  24 Apr 04, 14:28

  The only demand is probably in the wee hours of the morning.