To me it's not really a nightmare. Changes happen all the time, you just have to take them in your stride.Originally posted by cck_190:Of course I know that...I even saved a copy of the SBS Press Release in July 1999.
I'd like to say sorry if I had annoyed some of you over this exchange thing. It's just that this thing is like a nightmare to me. I was happy when I moved to CCK in late 98 because there was my favourite service plus Superbuses. Around 6mths later, this nightmare occured...the exchange.
I'm really sorry if I had annoyed some of you. I'll try my best not to talk about this matter.![]()
Well...when i meant nightmare, i don't mean like it was very nightmarish or something like that. It was just very surprising and sad.Originally posted by SBS9818A:To me it's not really a nightmare. Changes happen all the time, you just have to take them in your stride.
just like an intruder trespass into a bank and rob away your happiness?Originally posted by cck_190:Well...when i meant nightmare, i don't mean like it was very nightmarish or something like that. It was just very surprising and sad.
Yes.Originally posted by freakybuses:just like an intruder trespass into a bank and rob away your happiness?
Or just like someone slap you and ran away as fast as he can,right?Originally posted by cck_190:Yes.
If like that, I chase the guy till I catch himOriginally posted by BlessingSatan:Or just like someone slap you and ran away as fast as he can,right?![]()
Let's get back on topic please. Another change I'd administer is reinstate Sv. 989Originally posted by cck_190:If like that, I chase the guy till I catch him![]()
Frankly speaking, I don't think 989 was really made as a link to CGA. It just terminated there.Originally posted by SBS9818A:Let's get back on topic please. Another change I'd administer is reinstate Sv. 989
Service 989 wasn't under SBS Transit in the first place.Originally posted by cck_190:Frankly speaking, I don't think 989 was really made as a link to CGA. It just terminated there.
What I think is that 989 was like an intertown service between Choa Chu Kang, Bukit Batok & Jurong East. Maybe, 989 would have Terminated at Jurong East Int or Boonlay Int if it wasn't under SBS Transit.
I meant Jurong East int or Boon Lay int is under SBST, so, 989 could notr terminate there. Sorry for the confusionOriginally posted by off_service:Service 989 wasn't under SBS Transit in the first place.