Suprising, most Sv 8 drivers drives this service daily... Must have something went wrongOriginally posted by Airbus330Captain:These 2 incidents happened a few days ago.bus 969 make a turn to seletar camp , Jln Kayu with a lot of shocking looking passengers. Apparently this driver shouldn't have turned in Jln Kayu.
Bus 8 driver driving along bedok reservoir road heading towards Tampines missed the turn that leads to Tamasek poly and as a result, he had to carry on driving until he turned right just near the safra's junction continuing her normal route to tampines. A lot of shocked passenger's faces as well.
Originally posted by SBS9818A:Why would I want to do anything to 88? The demand is very healthy. Only complain is that sometimes buses are quite packed, 88 should be fully double deck
Let me warn you first. You'd better [b]NOT do anything to my Sv. 88 by giving feedback to SBST. You'll make an enemy for life if you do so.[/b]
Originally posted by SBS9818A:Let's be nice ok ? Do you think SBST really give a damn about our feedback ?
Let me warn you first. You'd better [b]NOT do anything to my Sv. 88 by giving feedback to SBST. You'll make an enemy for life if you do so.[/b]
Sometimes if our reasons are reasonable and true (Honesty). Not just us as wellOriginally posted by Airbus330Captain:Let's be nice ok ? Do you think SBST really give a damn about our feedback ?
I'm not happy that they deploy quite a significant amt of single decks on 88 when demand is highOriginally posted by leeJZ:88 got nothing to complain about, plenty of DDs with very good freq.
That 969 driver must have been transferred from 858 and as for that Svc 8 driver, probably been doing stuff like 65![]()
Not really significant, a couple of Mk4s and the odd Merz.Originally posted by sbst275:I'm not happy that they deploy quite a significant amt of single decks on 88 when demand is high
Yes, they do care. Although most of the time it ends up in the bin.Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:Let's be nice ok ? Do you think SBST really give a damn about our feedback ?
This happened on Tuesday 05 Feb 2001, 6.50am.Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:These 2 incidents happened a few days ago.bus 969 make a turn to seletar camp , Jln Kayu with a lot of shocking looking passengers. Apparently this driver shouldn't have turned in Jln Kayu.
Bus 8 driver driving along bedok reservoir road heading towards Tampines missed the turn that leads to Tamasek poly and as a result, he had to carry on driving until he turned right just near the safra's junction continuing her normal route to tampines. A lot of shocked passenger's faces as well.
which bus stops? tis brings to memories the times when it was under the RapidBus banner, where some bus stops between PIE & Orchard Rd are skipped, like:Originally posted by sbst275:Seeing TIB 743 Y of 700 skipping bus stops.
the only mk5 with that ad i know is 2702X. it did 66 on saturday.Originally posted by ^tamago^:717S JB Mk3 on 198 (bb 170)
Unidentified Mk4 Dm3500 on 174 (could it be 2700B again? it's sky blue Hoya full-body ad)
O.405 WA on 162 (179U or 196U?)
Originally posted by ^tamago^:Chancery Lane (Cold Storage) BS
which bus stops? tis brings to memories the times when it was under the RapidBus banner, where some bus stops between PIE & Orchard Rd are skipped, like:
............
[b]Whitley RdAft Tanglin CC/Raffles Town Club pair
Dunearn RdSCGS pair
Swiss Cottage Pri Sch pair
Bef Goldhill Ave (tis bus stop wasn't there then)
Anglo-Chinese Sch/City Towers pair
Chancery Ct/Balmoral Plaza
Newton Circus pair
Newton RdNewton Stn pair
Environment Bldg/Hotel Asia pair
Scotts RdFar East Plaza/Royal Plaza pair
.........
it also plied Esplanade Dr/Bridge. in 2000, svcs 501 & 508 are the other svcs to use the bridge, and of the 3 svcs, only 501 stopped at the bus stop opposite the then-under-construction Esplanade Theatres.
i supposed it skipped more bus stops than now when it originated from Woodlands before this, when it was introduced sometime in late 1998/1999. anyone knows?[/b]
SBS 9324 has been a 132 bus for very long liaoOriginally posted by ^tamago^:9243H on 86 (hg 197)
9324H on 132 (it's not cameo but i thought it was so at first, like some deja vu. interesting combi to see on the same night.)