I would want SBS to scrap the NAC svs standard. They can just call it Ind Svs as all NAC svs are serving industrial pks and Housing Est rts will be FAC though demand is lowOriginally posted by sbs&tibs:I don't think this is a complaint, but some kind of things I want to say.
I don't think JIs deserve VO mk2 buses. I think they should get scania non aircon buses instead of mk2. It is ok to leave some there at SLBP. I would rather see mk2 on BNDEP svcs. Most preferably are CAC MK2s.
Do you want more SDs or DDs on service 51?Originally posted by leeJZ:btw off topic but despite SLBP having large numbers of DM3500s, it seems that 66 105 get most of them while 51 gets a small number. Not spread out like BN/HG/AM.
No, I was just commenting that the Mk4 DM3500s @ SLBP are almost exclusively for 66 105, unlike other depots where they are most spread out.Originally posted by tranquilice:Do you want more SDs or DDs on service 51?![]()
Then which services do you wish them to be deployed on?Originally posted by leeJZ:No, I was just commenting that the Mk4 DM3500s @ SLBP are almost exclusively for 66 105, unlike other depots where they are most spread out.
Just more SLBP services like 143 157, it seems quite too few to only be on three services when there is a sizeable fleet of them at SLBP, even AMDEP which has a smaller number of them deploys them on more services.Originally posted by tranquilice:Then which services do you wish them to be deployed on?
There is no service from Clementi interchange to Pasir Panjang Rd.Originally posted by leeJZ:Just more SLBP services like 143 157, it seems quite too few to only be on three services when there is a sizeable fleet of them at SLBP, even AMDEP which has a smaller number of them deploys them on more services.
btw in the case of Sv 10, isnt there also 166 from CLE - HBF?
Speaking About the dumb OAC Scanias, there is one worst one in the SBST fleet. SBS 65 P on sv 157. There are a million tiny flying insects at the back and there are sometimes moths flying around. The vents are leaking during rainy days. I got splashed once while sitting at the last secongd seat. This bus MUST be the first to be SCRAPPED, IMO.Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:If you ask me which buses to get rid of ....
I have 3 in my mind.
Mark 3s , Scania OAC (SBST) and LO 3 axles . I hate these buses.
The timecard explain that,Not the drivers!Originally posted by the Bear:how about the early buses? those 1st or 2nd buses of the morning...
how come they must crawl into the interchange.. i bet people can walk as fast as the buses are moving sometimes...
get pissed off coz i work shifts and the morning shift, i take 97 or 197 to Jurong East... they'll start driving really really slowly once they past that crest.. and then slowly crawl to the interchange...
some even slow down at the traffic light and crawl to the intersection, just to get stuck at the red lights..
why?
Originally posted by carbikebus:The timecard explain that,Not the drivers!![]()
They are ahead of schedule, maybe due to low pax movement. The timesheets for SBST give quite alot of time to the drivers to complete the route in case of traffic lights, heavy pax movement, etc etc.Originally posted by the Bear:so, they were speeding in the earlier part?
thought a speed limited killed the speeding?
The timetable at night is quite tight.. Bus captain can go crazyOriginally posted by SBS9845X:I always go to east coast , so i take 162 to dhoby ghaut to take a free shuttle bus to marine cove. I dun understand, 162 in the afternoon crawls like a snail. On my way back, the bus is like, well, almost FLYING. Had a few near misses somemore. Why is this happening at night only?