No, it has been squeezed into 1 unless like Stevens Rd (RTC)Originally posted by ^tamago^:I totally have no issue with this. however, there is another problem at some bus stops with thin transparent panels inside the bus stops used for service information. before, they will use all two to display the information, one by service & fares, the other by road name. now, adshel decides to use one of the panels for their own advertisements to attract more revenue, and one of the information sheet is "banished" to the back, leading to some commuters having to ask around for directions if the service happens "not to be listed", and no one actually found the information hiding, literally, behind their back. and if it's raining, they may have to stand partially or fully out in the rain to read the information. also, they may not be able to see if any of the buses they may want to take have arrived while reading behind those panels.
mine is found at Dunearn Rd, Opp Sixth Ave.Originally posted by sbst275:No, it has been squeezed into 1 unless like Stevens Rd (RTC)
In fact, the BS Opp RTC, the service guide has been blocked by a ADSHEL AdAnyone going to report to LTA?
I'm not talking abt it, the main issue is - The "co" is TransitlinkOriginally posted by service_238:stop harping on the aircon status.
the company that prints it gets the info from the bus companies.
so its not their fault.
if this continues i will not hesistate to close the thread.
Bt Timah Rd (That related stretch) has to have 2 boards because stops with more than 12 services will need to have a 2nd oneOriginally posted by ^tamago^:mine is found at Dunearn Rd, Opp Sixth Ave.
dun think so, unless they come up in large numbers, and even then commuters would have re-orientated themselves to it.
indicating only air-con fares is never a problem since non air-con fares are cheaper than air-con fares, so commuters cannot never feel cheated or short-changed since they will be charged lower than it anyway. if they only show non-air con fare i will definitely put up a complaint.Originally posted by sbst275:They have a loophole - Classification of NAC/ PAC/ FAC services
This means like at IF Nth Buona Vista Rd. Sv 91 and 191 are NAC. Passengers will feel cheated that no aircon buses are deployed as there are aircon fares "stated" for all services
I see, but.... (Full stop)Originally posted by ^tamago^:indicating only air-con fares is never a problem since non air-con fares are cheaper than air-con fares, so commuters cannot never feel cheated or short-changed since they will be charged lower than it anyway. if they only show non-air con fare i will definitely put up a complaint.
in addition, the services mentioned here are short-distance services so non air-con should never be a major issue since their travelling time on the bus is short. also, these services cater mainly to workers or residents who stay or work at the small area served by the services and they will know if it is an air-con or non air-con service since they have taken it long enough.
also, since u have stated the buses were listed as NAC, there is nothing wrong with the information listed in the board.
full stop. no more complaints on this NAC issue.