Full Armour in Singapore?
-
Anyone here rides with full armour? Is there a reason why so few people ride with armour on our roads? Reasons? Embarassed? Shy? Too expensive?
I always see people riding with leathers (upper body) but no armour ... kinda defeats the purpose? Worst, I've seen people riding in shorts, singlet ...
Could save your life and alot of hurt. -
Firstly, because of weather.
Secondly,pple lazy to wear full armour.
Thirdly,because a full riding attire is expensive.
Fourth,because of perception eg those riding smaller bikes may be scared pple look at them wif weird looks.
Some pple already say wear full-face helmet ride wave or scooter look 'toot',wat more full attire
Think only for those who wan to go those bike tour,like ride around Asia then maybe will buy.
It is due to our culture oso. u go europe ride bike wearing singlet and slippers,pple will think u r alien
-
Singaporeans care too much about what other people think than thinking for themselves...Every decision has to be influenced by somebody...Totally no mind of their own..
-
The weather in Singapore is the reason.
Plus the number of stops in Singapore....dont justify for it.
And plus....full armour does not mean your bones wont break or your life is secure.
It just means less injuries from abrasions.
A full face helmet, thick jeans, covered shoes & thick jacket will work well enough in Singapore.
edited to add: Plus, your defensive riding and mindset to ride safe is more important then wearing any armour. If you speed, cut other vehicles way dangerously or arent paying attention to your surroundings and the road....no amount of armour can protect you from an accident.
there has been instances of riders, with full armour, on a heavy big bike, running into back of lorries in Malaysia at full speed and died.
There has been instances of riders, with full armour, on sport bikes, riding fast speed on track, met with accidents, fly thru the air, landed on the speedway, nearly broke his spine, broke his hands and some parts of his leg. No abrasions. But certainly broken bones and nearly paralysed or broken necks. -
The examples you mention are really extreme; armour has proven effects.Originally posted by viciouskitty74:The weather in Singapore is the reason.
Plus the number of stops in Singapore....dont justify for it.
And plus....full armour does not mean your bones wont break or your life is secure.
It just means less injuries from abrasions.
A full face helmet, thick jeans, covered shoes & thick jacket will work well enough in Singapore.
edited to add: Plus, your defensive riding and mindset to ride safe is more important then wearing any armour. If you speed, cut other vehicles way dangerously or arent paying attention to your surroundings and the road....no amount of armour can protect you from an accident.
there has been instances of riders, with full armour, on a heavy big bike, running into back of lorries in Malaysia at full speed and died.
There has been instances of riders, with full armour, on sport bikes, riding fast speed on track, met with accidents, fly thru the air, landed on the speedway, nearly broke his spine, broke his hands and some parts of his leg. No abrasions. But certainly broken bones and nearly paralysed or broken necks.
We all know that most (if not, all) cars have airbags. They don't always guarantee the safety of the driver, following an accident; however, it is undisputed that it greatly increases the odds of survival.
I can understand the argument based on Singapore's weather. However, it is but a small price to pay compared to the medical costs that could ensue (not to mention, in the case of paralysis etc., potential losses arising from lost of jobs).
With regards to price, SG bike gear is really cheap. Like dirt dirt dirt cheap. Same items here cost a fortune overseas. Considering the average rider will not be involved in accidents on a weekly basis, armor purchased can be considered a lifelong investment, and an investment to prolong life.
Leathers (without armour) really serve no practical purpose other than to protect against minor abrasions. And I don't think any random pair of jeans will help either. As far as I'm aware, I believe there exists "kevlar jeans" (by a co. called Dragging Jeans or something); very expensive stuff, and that's the only "jeans" that I'm aware of that has any real, substantial benefit to the rider. -
Full armour for track.
But when you riding around, to work, visiting, makan etc are you going to do quick changes?
or even walk around in full armour?
in this sweltering heat? -
a full armour serve no purpose in singapore ba, will only invite weird stares," this fellow siao si bo?"
-
Full armour for touring.
At least full face helmet, gloves for riding in Singapore.
Most times. With at least my full leather riding jacket in Singapore.
The leather keeps me warm and keeps out the rain. -
Improvise.Originally posted by rmyfrm:Leathers (without armour) really serve no practical purpose other than to protect against minor abrasions. And I don't think any random pair of jeans will help either. As far as I'm aware, I believe there exists "kevlar jeans" (by a co. called Dragging Jeans or something); very expensive stuff, and that's the only "jeans" that I'm aware of that has any real, substantial benefit to the rider.
Try wearing jeans, add on rollablading knee pads. Its the same concept as armour pants.
And better yet, if you can get a seamstress/tailor to sew extra pockets in your own jeans to insert the paddings. -
the only time i put on my full riding gear is when i go touring.
people talk about safety, that i agree.
but LOGICALLY :
i'm not going to wear my full riding gear and walk around suntec city in it.
i'm not going to wear my full riding gear to go to work.
i'm not going to wear my full riding gear just because i want to go to tampines mall to makan.
i wear my shorts and slippers KNOWING that if i get into an accident that involves me sliding across the road, i'm in deep sh*t. but that doesn't stop me from not putting on my riding gear. why? i think logic has to apply sometimes.