Ban motorcycling in Singapore ?
-
Even those sitting behind the front passenger and car driver have to put on safety belt... What about the motorcyclist ? Don't even have to wear any safety belt~ My point is,should the government ban motorcycling as it's dangerous because there's no safetly belt. Motorcycle ramming onto an obstacle is equal to a 'fly to the front' ride.. Or should the government redraw back the stupid safety belt rules ?
-
Then should the goverment send all Taxi Drivers for some driving courses due to accidents involving Taxis increases?? Those Bastards hit pedestrain still can bail out, what the heck.
-
I tink it's a good idea to put on safety belt for cars lor. No matter wat it's juz a safety precaution for all pple. For banning motorcycles, do you tink that everyone can afford their own cars, I dun tink so. It's a cheaper alternative for pple to have their own transport and not squeezing with others for public transport. That's my point of view.
-
if biking gonna be banned, u could expect a major riotOriginally posted by zxcvbnm:Even those sitting behind the front passenger and car driver have to put on safety belt... What about the motorcyclist ? Don't even have to wear any safety belt~ My point is,should the government ban motorcycling as it's dangerous because there's no safetly belt. Motorcycle ramming onto an obstacle is equal to a 'fly to the front' ride.. Or should the government redraw back the stupid safety belt rules ?
the theory is simple, if ur afraid, dun do it -
hmm..motorcycle rammin into cars = dangerous?Originally posted by zxcvbnm:Even those sitting behind the front passenger and car driver have to put on safety belt... What about the motorcyclist ? Don't even have to wear any safety belt~ My point is,should the government ban motorcycling as it's dangerous because there's no safetly belt. Motorcycle ramming onto an obstacle is equal to a 'fly to the front' ride.. Or should the government redraw back the stupid safety belt rules ?
so i presume eatin fishes and chokin on the bones r oso dangerous?
so i oso can presume dat walkin home at nite by urself is oso dangerous coz bandits might appear?
so can i suggest to the gov to ban eatin fishes and walkin in dark allys??
......if u dun like to use safety belts...so be it ....bannin motorcycles?
i may sound rude or wat...but DREAM ON -
should ban the aeroplane. Airplane crash every where..... 1 time can kill 400+
-
LOL....
-
hello!!. just imagine if u had a motorcycle strap on, then when ur bike kena accident and ski, dun tell me u are willing to stick together with ur motorbike and get dragged? so it's better to fly to the front and avoid a mishap then stick with a bike that is being sent to its doom.maybe thats y they dun implement the rule on motorcyclists. hmm..about banning motorcycles, i think should they ever do that, there will be a major riot, as someone quoted earlier. bus nowdays oledi so bloody crowded and expensive. if ever, bikes get banned, then i think everyone will be a quitter in singapore.Originally posted by zxcvbnm:Even those sitting behind the front passenger and car driver have to put on safety belt... What about the motorcyclist ? Don't even have to wear any safety belt~ My point is,should the government ban motorcycling as it's dangerous because there's no safetly belt. Motorcycle ramming onto an obstacle is equal to a 'fly to the front' ride.. Or should the government redraw back the stupid safety belt rules ? -
This is a lame topic.
-
You are implying that our government should let us do things at our own risks ? Sure i would want to do so by not puting safety belt when im in the car.. I am f**king taking my own risk of my life and why are the bloody traffic polices still trying to stalk people like me and offer me a fine ? I am taking my own risk..Why the heck would they want to interfere ?Originally posted by ZecHs:hmm..motorcycle rammin into cars = dangerous?
so i presume eatin fishes and chokin on the bones r oso dangerous?
so i oso can presume dat walkin home at nite by urself is oso dangerous coz bandits might appear?
so can i suggest to the gov to ban eatin fishes and walkin in dark allys??
......if u dun like to use safety belts...so be it ....bannin motorcycles?
i may sound rude or wat...but DREAM ON
Hmm,even if im trying making a 40 on the road without my safety belt on,do you think if a TP saw me doing that finds it perfectly normal ? ,,|,, A public bus can hold 40+ sitted passengers. Often when im on a public bus,sometimes,they are even cruising faster than a car with a 80 ? What's my conclusion ? INSERT 40+ DAMN SAFETY BELTS FOR THE 40+ SEATED PASSENGERS AND FORBID STANDING PASSENGER !!!! -
straits times.Originally posted by zxcvbnm:You are implying that our government should let us do things at our own risks ? Sure i would want to do so by not puting safety belt when im in the car.. I am f**king taking my own risk of my life and why are the bloody traffic polices still trying to stalk people like me and offer me a fine ? I am taking my own risk..Why the heck would they want to interfere ?
Hmm,even if im trying making a 40 on the road without my safety belt on,do you think if a TP saw me doing that finds it perfectly normal ? ,,|,, A public bus can hold 40+ sitted passengers. Often when im on a public bus,sometimes,they are even cruising faster than a car with a 80 ? What's my conclusion ? INSERT 40+ DAMN SAFETY BELTS FOR THE 40+ SEATED PASSENGERS AND FORBID STANDING PASSENGER !!!! -
Hey, how old are you?Originally posted by zxcvbnm:My point is,should the government ban motorcycling as it's dangerous because there's no safetly belt.
Don make me laugh le, Hahaha.......
You must be naive and foolish to make that remark.
Ban motorcycling?
Haha, rubbish.
Really hope to see you in person and giv ya the middle-finger.
,,|,,
Get a life dude!~
-
Originally posted by VspecR34:
aiyo.. relax lah.. its just his suggestion and query only.. no need to show him middle finger and all.. lets keep this a frenly debate shall we?
Hey, how old are you?
Don make me laugh le, Hahaha.......
You must be naive and foolish to make that remark.
[b]Ban motorcycling?
Haha, rubbish.
Really hope to see you in person and giv ya the middle-finger. ,,|,,
Get a life dude!~ [/b] -
Originally posted by VspecR34:
aiyo.. relax lah.. its just his suggestion and query only.. no need to show him middle finger and all.. lets keep this a frenly debate shall we?
Hey, how old are you?
Don make me laugh le, Hahaha.......
You must be naive and foolish to make that remark.
[b]Ban motorcycling?
Haha, rubbish.
Really hope to see you in person and giv ya the middle-finger. ,,|,,
Get a life dude!~ [/b] -
it's ppl like you dat kill motorcyclist on the road. ppl like you dat are biased against riders. ppl like who who dun give way to motorcyclist. ppl like you who hit motorcyclist and drive off.Originally posted by zxcvbnm:You are implying that our government should let us do things at our own risks ? Sure i would want to do so by not puting safety belt when im in the car.. I am f**king taking my own risk of my life and why are the bloody traffic polices still trying to stalk people like me and offer me a fine ? I am taking my own risk..Why the heck would they want to interfere ?
Hmm,even if im trying making a 40 on the road without my safety belt on,do you think if a TP saw me doing that finds it perfectly normal ? ,,|,, A public bus can hold 40+ sitted passengers. Often when im on a public bus,sometimes,they are even cruising faster than a car with a 80 ? What's my conclusion ? INSERT 40+ DAMN SAFETY BELTS FOR THE 40+ SEATED PASSENGERS AND FORBID STANDING PASSENGER !!!!
and it's ppl like you that all motorcyclist wish we carried a hammer on our bikes to smash your car windscreen when we ride by. you will end up a murder victim soon. -
Suggestion?Originally posted by yahoo.com:aiyo.. relax lah.. its just his suggestion and query only.. no need to show him middle finger and all.. lets keep this a frenly debate shall we?
Don you find he's suggestion pointless?
Don flame me, I'm also juz giving my suggestion.
Lolx!
haha. -
Hey, I deduce that you got a traffic fine from our always-alert-for-unreasonable-drivers- Traffic Policemen.Originally posted by zxcvbnm:You are implying that our government should let us do things at our own risks ? Sure i would want to do so by not puting safety belt when im in the car.. I am f**king taking my own risk of my life and why are the bloody traffic polices still trying to stalk people like me and offer me a fine ? I am taking my own risk..Why the heck would they want to interfere ?
Hmm,even if im trying making a 40 on the road without my safety belt on,do you think if a TP saw me doing that finds it perfectly normal ? ,,|,, A public bus can hold 40+ sitted passengers. Often when im on a public bus,sometimes,they are even cruising faster than a car with a 80 ? What's my conclusion ? INSERT 40+ DAMN SAFETY BELTS FOR THE 40+ SEATED PASSENGERS AND FORBID STANDING PASSENGER !!!!
So sad, that you got the fine and how much was it?
$120?
Poor thing.....
But what has it got to do with us, riders?
Don come in this forum here and make a fool out of yrself.
If you can afford to drive a car, why cant you pay the fine?
Scared? Feelin unfair?
The bus and train is always there for pple like you. -
If you can afford to drive a car, why cant you pay the fine?Originally posted by VspecR34:Hey, I deduce that you got a traffic fine from our always-alert-for-unreasonable-drivers- Traffic Policemen.
So sad, that you got the fine and how much was it?
$120?
Poor thing.....
But what has it got to do with us, riders?
Don come in this forum here and make a fool out of yrself.
If you can afford to drive a car, why cant you pay the fine?
Scared? Feelin unfair?
The bus and train is always there for pple like you.
---> haha i fully agree on this point. wholeheartedly!! -
LOL~ So he's one of those faggots. Nothing happen that time diam diam, now kanna fine already then come here KPKB say what ban motorcycling lah, why motorcycle no seat belts.
Tell you one think. If you are afraid of the FINE and DEMERIT POINTS, just bloody hell and be a obedient citizen and put on the seat belt. -
cannot leh, then wait ppl will say u got $ buy bike why no $ pah petrol, must always go JB pah yuOriginally posted by yahoo.com:If you can afford to drive a car, why cant you pay the fine?
---> haha i fully agree on this point. wholeheartedly!!
-
hahah, then ppls like me will sae, to help booast JB economy up , so go their pak yuOriginally posted by nismoS132:cannot leh, then wait ppl will say u got $ buy bike why no $ pah petrol, must always go JB pah yu
or sae we singaporean noe hw to save more $$ on petrol to do more mods, so go JB -
zxcvbnm tink u beta get over that fine, and stop ur topic here, coz its seems u hitting @ all bikers here in this forums as mostly are riding,, jus the same theory as u saw a rider is very rude n cut car, here, there, doesnt mean the whole rider is that, u get fine doesnt mean all riders need to acc u to get fine or get ban for that, hope u understand that
-
hahahah
if got seat belts on motorcycles...
then when bike langa, rider fly with bike to holland liao -
to be fair to car drivers, some bike sometime also quite bastard, sometimes cut into their lane unexpected, make the driver panic, sometime bike like to stay at the driver blind spot, the driver want to change lane also scared bang the bike, alot of senario cos with every bad driver there is also a bad rider,
But the situation is the same for us Riders, with one exception (ur lives are at stake, if the driver drive recklessly)
Banning bikes, i dont mind (if the current transportatin is a damm efficent one) or to be fair ban all cars too, except for delivery vehicles.. then lesser cars on road, more higher frquency of busses, busses operate 24 hrs, they go to more routes, taxi are cheaper then busses travel more smooth, when u take a bus during rush hour u dont have to squeeze in the bus... then , if thats the case where in rush hour u take a bus also can have a sit, then i will be the first to give up my bike.....
till then the idea of banning a bike is kind of selfish.... -
neverOriginally posted by visual:Banning bikes, i dont mind (if the current transportatin is a damm efficent one) or to be fair ban all cars too, except for delivery vehicles.. then lesser cars on road, more higher frquency of busses, busses operate 24 hrs, they go to more routes, taxi are cheaper then busses travel more smooth, when u take a bus during rush hour u dont have to squeeze in the bus... then , if thats the case where in rush hour u take a bus also can have a sit, then i will be the first to give up my bike.....