City Harvest Church?
-
Originally posted by kager82:
Why are you so offensive like "a bear who lost her cubs"?
Who would you represent in have this attitude? How do you want people to look at the teachings that you received?
Aren't you representing Chirst our Lord when you discuss in the forum as well?
Please refrain from being ungodly... It also display a bad image for your church that you've been trying to defend...
Thank you, you said the words that I dare not say to him.NOn believers will be pushed away with those words.
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
o-O heated discussion
hee hee, midz. kager82 handles it so well. A good example of mature christian. -
Lol, that's good.
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
You really sure you wanna talk to me after giving comments about the shoo?why not? i wasn't the one who shoo-ed others.
i was just explaining that nowadays, it isn't enough to just share what you know. it isn't as simple as that anymore. people of this age, they just don't believe just because they want to exercise that choice, even if they are wrong.
and you illustrated it. lol.
i mean, you can't be mad at me if you shooed someone then i used it as an illustration right? if you didn't shoo that person, i wouldn't have been able to illustrate also wat.
-
there will be peace with christian like kager82.
So we see not all christians are nasty.
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Lol, that's good.
sometimes it is good to let those troublemaking christians alone. they are accountable to god. -
There's differences between obsessed and believe, imo.
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
There's differences between obsessed and believe, imo.
OMG!
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
there will be peace with christian like kager82.
So we see not all christians are nasty.
that's only because she didn't step on your toes by challenging your thoughts and ideas. if she suddenly did that, i won't be surprised if you retract that compliment.
then i will question it again.
a person is either "peaceful" or "quarrelsome", "good" or "nasty". it's in that person's nature - which doesn't really change.
so if kager one day decides to challenge a thought process of yours, would you still think she's nice?
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
OMG!Huh?
-
strange doesn't seem encouraging and happy that other christians are practising love.
-
well, something to think about.
what does it mean to be "loving" in this context?
is it true that nowadays, people don't believe because they just don't want to, regardless.
whether a person's character is determined by the label someone puts on them, easily placed, and easily removed.
then again, i don't expect anyone to think about these questions, because they just don't want to. as proven. =)
-
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
Huh?
I am not sure in christian context what is the difference between obsess and believe.I know that God teaches christians to show love and I see kager is doing it. Love is the essence of christianity. After reading posts here, we know who are obeying god.
-
Actually every religion teach us how to love each other .. I wun use the word "obey" bah.
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
I am not sure in christian context what is the difference between obsess and believe.I know that God teaches christians to show love and I see kager is doing it. Love is the essence of christianity. After reading posts here, we know who are obeying god.
lol, thats such an old strongarm tactic la.
you write the rules of what is considered loving and not loving according to your preferences.
then the question i ask is, do you have the prefect idea of what love should really be like?
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
lol, thats such an old strongarm tactic la.
you write the rules of what is considered loving and not loving according to your preference.
then the question i ask is, do you have the prefect idea of what love should really be like?
I know your tactic, reading your posts in muslim converted to catholic and other threads i know the sort of christian you are.BTW i attended bible study and mingle with christians before and I know what is required of christians. so don't come here bullshit with me. it is christians like you that non believers refuse to accept christ. You are bad representative of christ.
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
lol, thats such an old strongarm tactic la.
you write the rules of what is considered loving and not loving according to your preferences.
then the question i ask is, do you have the prefect idea of what love should really be like?
o-OU got the perfect idea? o-O
-
Originally posted by kager82:
Why are you so offensive like "a bear who lost her cubs"?
Who would you represent in have this attitude? How do you want people to look at the teachings that you received?
Aren't you representing Chirst our Lord when you discuss in the forum as well?
Please refrain from being ungodly... It also display a bad image for your church that you've been trying to defend...
oh, he's from chc ah. lol
hmm, regarding this image issue.. it's not as easy as that la.. because your image rest on whether you treat the other party the way they want to be treated.
if you are only labelled as "nice and peaceful", if you don't ever challenge them or share with them, then how? you want to look good or share?
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
I know your tactic, reading your posts in muslim converted to catholic and other threads i know the sort of christian you are.BTW i attended bible study and mingle with christians before and I know what is required of christians. so don't come here bullshit with me. it is christians like you that non believers refuse to accept christ. You are bad representative of christ.
well, i've an issue with getting makan-ed.
in the muslim thread, i didn't even do anything, and i got whacked. all i said was, why can't someone express their respect for TS for daring to do what he feels is right for himself even though he will get into alot of trouble for it, why is it considered insensitive for someone to say "kudos" to TS when he wants to convert.
hmm.. honestly was i wrong to say that?
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
well, i've an issue with getting makan-ed.
in the muslim thread, i didn't even do anything, and i got whacked. all i said was, why can't someone express their respect for TS for daring to do what he feels is right for himself even though he will get into alot of trouble for it, why is it considered insensitive for someone to say "kudos" to TS when he wants to convert.
hmm.. honestly was i wrong to say that?
do I care? ha ha ha. -
Originally posted by Midlusionz:
o-OU got the perfect idea? o-O
no i don't. that's why i try not to say things like
"oh, this person is loving"
"oh, this person is not loving"
simply based on their actions
because love is so.. complex? you have to see the intent, and the action and how the other person perceives love to be, and how they receive it.
any one part don't fit in nicely, and you're labeled as "unloving"
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
do I care? ha ha ha.that's why i used you to illustrate my point. lol. you're just perfect
-
tsk tsk tsk. someone refuses to do as god says and when other christian is doing it he is pissed off. who cares about his version of love. it is the version of god's context that matters in christianity. use reverse psychology, ha ha ha. backfires! ha ha ha. this is a typical good example of nasty christian!
-
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:
no i don't. that's why i try not to say things like
"oh, this person is loving"
"oh, this person is not loving"
simply based on their actions
because love is so.. complex? you have to see the intent, and the action and how the other person perceives love to be, and how they receive it.
any one part don't fit in nicely, and you're labeled as "unloving"
Yes that's no perfect idea.
Hence, everyone have their own defination and limit of "unloving" and "loving".
For example like, "oh, this person is loving" commented by a person mean there's something the person might or have done to deserve the comments from someone ma.
It does not need to be "approve" by others that "nah, that's not even loving" which in this case might be the defination of unloving of the person who commented.
Love is complex so dun make it even more complex by analzying till one go paralzye lol.
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
tsk tsk tsk. someone refuses to do as god says and when other christian is doing it he is pissed off. who cares about his version of love. it is the version of god's context that matters in christianity. use reverse psychology, ha ha ha. backfires! ha ha ha. this is a typical good example of nasty christian!
lol, it still doesn't change the fact that you did illustrate my point rather well.
like i said, i've long given up in contesting facts and reasoning. people have pretty much shown that they only believe and agree only when they want to, regardless whether it is right or wrong, good or bad, fact or fable, evident or theory.