nope. warfare doctrine/tactic are continously revised and improved through renewed conflict over the past decades. technology just make the gap wider.Originally posted by chronicles:Do you think soldiers from 1960s are better than current 3g soldiers as they rely more on instinct/hindsight than technology.
yeap. even if you are on par with the united states armed forces for this decade, this will not have any guarantee on the next decade. it is just a question on who can afford to keep up the arm race.Originally posted by kwlee:technology are supposingly to make combat easier for the soldier...
but since everyone is improving...
doesn't make a difference...
i agree on this one.Originally posted by chronicles:My point of view is that they learn how to operate new technology whilst learning old-school methods incase technology fails them,it might come in handy anytime.
Yet we must not forget that behind the hardware, is the soldier.And his software must be refined and upgraded too.Originally posted by Gordonator:i agree on this one.