military law...
-
is it true dat after a nsf ord, he's still bound to military law for 6 mths?
-
up till u ROD
-
After ORD, only bound when you're served SAF100.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:is it true dat after a nsf ord, he's still bound to military law for 6 mths? -
huh?Originally posted by Icemoon:After ORD, only bound when you're served SAF100. -
they don't bound you when you're not back for training.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:huh? -
What military laws you talking about?
-
Even reservists can be sent to DB. Very undemocratic, isn't it?
-
if they broke any rules that will result in DB while in camp then can;t be help cos they are bounded by military law while back in camp. what so undemocratic abt it?Originally posted by iveco:Even reservists can be sent to DB. Very undemocratic, isn't it?
if reservists are allow to do anything they want while back in camp for training isn;t it very undiscipline and unprofessional? an army that is not discipline is asking for trouble. -
What I mean is that reservists who do not show up for ICT can be sentenced to detention.Originally posted by strikefreedom:if they broke any rules that will result in DB while in camp then can;t be help cos they are bounded by military law while back in camp. what so undemocratic abt it?
if reservists are allow to do anything they want while back in camp for training isn;t it very undiscipline and unprofessional? an army that is not discipline is asking for trouble. -
ICT is re-training for reservists what. don't go is almost the same as AWOL isn't it? the law stated clearly that we are bounded to go for reservists training so there still nothing to do with undemocratic isn't it?Originally posted by iveco:What I mean is that reservists who do not show up for ICT can be sentenced to detention. -
if leak military secret when not doing reservice consdiered what?? military law??
-
need to be served SAF100 then bound?
then how about IPPT? -
I think will be considered a civil offence under Official Secrets Act?Originally posted by hisoka:if leak military secret when not doing reservice consdiered what?? military law?? -
considered civil arh??Originally posted by CKtalon:I think will be considered a civil offence under Official Secrets Act?
i would think criminal or something consider its "important" national secrets wor. -
Yes and No.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:is it true dat after a nsf ord, he's still bound to military law for 6 mths?
No is that you are not bound for things done after you ORD.
Yes is that, whatever wrong things you may have done before ORD, they have up to 6 months after ORD to pursue you for it.
It is what is commonly known as "statute of limitation". -
thx for clearin my doubt...Originally posted by Ponders:Yes and No.
No is that you are not bound for things done after you ORD.
Yes is that, whatever wrong things you may have done before ORD, they have up to 6 months after ORD to pursue you for it.
It is what is commonly known as "statute of limitation". -
Anyone remembers the time Paperduck missed his IPPT date?
-
as long as we need to do reservist, it best not to take thing lightly, be it ICT or IPPT since the penalty is not worth paying in anyway as the rules are stated clearly. and if we break them, we have only ourselve to blame and not others.
-
we can blame the rule setters. Duh!! and of course we can blame the pple who let the rule setters get into powerOriginally posted by strikefreedom:as long as we need to do reservist, it best not to take thing lightly, be it ICT or IPPT since the penalty is not worth paying in anyway as the rules are stated clearly. and if we break them, we have only ourselve to blame and not others.
-
oh so you prefer to have a bunch of soldiers that is panting like an old hog to defend singapore when we were under attack?Originally posted by hisoka:we can blame the rule setters. Duh!! and of course we can blame the pple who let the rule setters get into power
unfit soldiers is just a target board shooting practise for the enemy during a war. -
no link to my statement. i suggest you go relook it.Originally posted by strikefreedom:oh so you prefer to have a bunch of soldiers that is panting like an old hog to defend singapore when we were under attack?
unfit soldiers is just a target board shooting practise for the enemy during a war. -
you say blame it on the person who set the law. so isn't it as good as saying the laws which they set are useless or are redundant isn't it? that why it result in my reply to you.Originally posted by hisoka:no link to my statement. i suggest you go relook it.