Landrover is gonna to be replaced???
-
Is landrover is gonna replace by other vech????? If that the case muz go learn sia,cuz i oni noe how to drive landrover,3 tonner and 5 tonner....
-
Why worry so much?Originally posted by gaoxingdcf:Is landrover is gonna replace by other vech????? If that the case muz go learn sia,cuz i oni noe how to drive landrover,3 tonner and 5 tonner.... -
Yup, we've got Ssangyong Rextons, Ford Explorers and Mitsubishi Pajeros.
-
saw the rextons, more for urban usage. chiong in those tekong terrains sure gone case.Originally posted by Kuali Baba:Yup, we've got Ssangyong Rextons, Ford Explorers and Mitsubishi Pajeros. -
Ford Explorers? Now that's something I've not seen...Originally posted by Kuali Baba:Yup, we've got Ssangyong Rextons, Ford Explorers and Mitsubishi Pajeros. 
-
Yes.. but y worry.. SAF is the indecisive force. Takes a long while to change. I tink u ORD several times also landrover not completely replaced.
-
the landrovers are to be actively preserved.
-
Oh? the ford explorer was given a nod ar?Originally posted by Kuali Baba:Yup, we've got Ssangyong Rextons, Ford Explorers and Mitsubishi Pajeros.
back when they were choosing the ford vehicles, all the testers of the vehicles gave csto a thumbs down...
this SAF ar... fickle minded. -
I feel nothing beats the good old Landrover.
The only thing that should replace it is another newer landrover or a Hummer.
How the heck is a bloody civilian SUV gonna take a troops with full gear?
Sometimes, I wonder what the heck is going thru the minds of the people who make such decisions. -
Rextons have liaoz.. saw those at NDP.. other havent seen yet..
-
agree, hummer would be gd....but its as wide as a single lane on our roads.Originally posted by baseturn:I feel nothing beats the good old Landrover.
The only thing that should replace it is another newer landrover or a Hummer.
How the heck is a bloody civilian SUV gonna take a troops with full gear?
Sometimes, I wonder what the heck is going thru the minds of the people who make such decisions. -
tried the hummer in ROC. terror man!Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:agree, hummer would be gd....but its as wide as a single lane on our roads. -
i was thinking of buying a L/R when they are phasing them out...
-
its gd stuff loh.Originally posted by monoslayer:tried the hummer in ROC. terror man! -
u can still buy. range rover looks gd.Originally posted by Master -_-:i was thinking of buying a L/R when they are phasing them out... -
Why do you worry? When the time comes for you to go and learn, they will inform you.Originally posted by gaoxingdcf:Is landrover is gonna replace by other vech????? If that the case muz go learn sia,cuz i oni noe how to drive landrover,3 tonner and 5 tonner.... -
I think they will maintain minimal number of L/R for operational use.
But they will lease SUV. Meaning SAF do not own and maintain them.
Before i ORD'ed i noticed that several Civilians SUVs are shipped to Tekong for trials...
SUBARU forrester one of them. -
APS?Originally posted by ^tamago^:the landrovers are to be actively preserved.
Got a few bugs in that system too.. -
y saf don't want to own and maintain?Originally posted by Ponders:I think they will maintain minimal number of L/R for operational use.
But they will lease SUV. Meaning SAF do not own and maintain them.
Before i ORD'ed i noticed that several Civilians SUVs are shipped to Tekong for trials...
SUBARU forrester one of them. -
it is a common practice where organisation do not want to own a fleet.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:y saf don't want to own and maintain?
If saf owns a fleet, the responsibility of maintaining falls on them. this way, SAF can't do what they are supposed to do (fight a war).
if they lease the fleet, maintanence falls on the owner instead.
also, SAF will be more flexible in the number of vehicles they want.
Lease more when time needs it... return when don need. -
but sounds very reliant. probably unavaliable when saf needs it.Originally posted by Ponders:it is a common practice where organisation do not want to own a fleet.
If saf owns a fleet, the responsibility of maintaining falls on them. this way, SAF can't do what they are supposed to do (fight a war).
if they lease the fleet, maintanence falls on the owner instead.
also, SAF will be more flexible in the number of vehicles they want.
Lease more when time needs it... return when don need. -
is this being used by the SAF? anybody seen it running around?
http://www.stengg.com/CoyCapPro/detail.aspx?pdid=274 -
probably still trying to market the vehicle...Originally posted by saline:is this being used by the SAF? anybody seen it running around?
http://www.stengg.com/CoyCapPro/detail.aspx?pdid=274 -
Is the entire vehicle an ST Kinetics design? Or is the vehicle based on some other platform and STK just modified it.Originally posted by saline:is this being used by the SAF? anybody seen it running around?
http://www.stengg.com/CoyCapPro/detail.aspx?pdid=274
I still think we should get more Spyders. If the Australian company has gone under (pardon the pun) we should just purchase the design and build them ourselves. -
have u all ever considered the fact that the SUV is being used by some units actively because of ops requirements, and not because for show?
that being said, yes, to completely replace the landrover with the SUV is sheer stupidity.
hmm... this vehicle from STK looks kinda nice... but im no expert on vehicles so...