Originally posted by LazerLordz:
We might be able to keep the same number of soldiers in the force if a new hypothetical Reserve Command can offer free university education for volunteers and part time weekend training a la the Territorial Army system in UK, Australia and New Zealand.
Put this with the GI Bill that the US Army offers to ROTC and Reserve Troops for study+training, it might work.
Can the economy sustain this, we need more in-depth study. However, I don't believe the powers that be will give two hoots about the benefits of such a radical change. Namely that the current military scholarship system co-opts leaders and provides for unspoken political-economical continuity of leadership for the PAP government. It acts as a way to "re-shape" the youth, through the traditional tools of calibrated coercion, and the leverage on national defense as a cohesion building tool.
The SAF has become an institution for communal bonding and leadership training, rather than an Army first and foremost.
These words might sound radical, but look deeper, and it is very true indeed.
interesting analysis. I'm actually for a UK/US version of the reservist force.. it sounds on the surface like a great way to earn your education while protecting the country/serving the nation ( if you buy that bulls**t). it could also bring in more credible people into the reserve force of SG Army.
the system of NS still has a lot of ground to cover if they want it to be an effective 'nation building tool'.