i doubt that. junior ranks can salute them now.Originally posted by ah-soh:but now i dun think any SWO would want to convert to MAJ as their pay might be lower and they will not be getting enough respect.
Commissioned Officers retire as early as 40-42. I think there is a saturation of ranks at MAJs and LTCs. They have to make way for younger officers and therefore have to be retired.Originally posted by anonymouse:Is it true that for Regulars, Commisioned Officers have to retire earlier than NCOs?
Whilst for NSmen, officers may have to serve up to 55y, wherease NCOs ROD by 40y.
What's the logic?
Why would you say that?Originally posted by Ponders:I heard all this WO convert to Officer is just a big rumour going around.
entire SAF only 42 SWO... this was 2005 figures.Originally posted by Fatshort:i seldom see SWO around, only saw few MWO...
imo, SWO deserve more respect then a MAJ, they start from a chao recruit all the way up there... long journey...
my Work place already got at least 4 SWO liew. And about majors, my place got dunno how many, like as many as how many fish in the underwater world. So ya SWO deserve more respect.Originally posted by Fatshort:i seldom see SWO around, only saw few MWO...
imo, SWO deserve more respect then a MAJ, they start from a chao recruit all the way up there... long journey...
Why does SAF need so many SWOs. It is a pinacle rank, just some deserving few should suffice. Imagine we have 42 LGs.Originally posted by Ponders:entire SAF only 42 SWO... this was 2005 figures.
Dunno the latest.. but i dun think it will be very much different
Originally posted by KoolKool:erm....what does this term means??
Why does SAF need so many SWOs. It is a pinacle rank, just some deserving few should suffice. Imagine we have 42 LGs.