Guards / Commandos / Rangers / NDU FAQ
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Oh me, oh my. Yet another lie. After all, in this thread you've already stated:
Whoop, there it is. So, are you busy or are you free? Liar, liar, pants on fire, just jammed that rod up you arse even higher.
Oh, so your idea of entertainment is being having your LIES exposed to the public? Jesus Christ, you're more fucked-up than I dared imagine.
There's sweet fuck-all chance of what you've posted being true, so don't waste time on impossible scenarios.
The doctors that you have met have simply been polite and found nice ways of describing your distended rectum to you. Once you go away, they have a good laugh about that fucking 3-tonner that tore right up your arse, did a U-turn and drifted its way back out again. I know - I've had enough such laughs in that rarefied atomsphere well above your pitiful station in what you try to pass off as a life.
Most assuredly, nowhere close to being as stupid as you on your best day. Yes, go celebrate that win now.
You just like to truncate people's words . What I am saying is that you are making a fool of yourself. Because what I am saying is the Truth.
In the previous gangster incident, you had gone on uttering your nonsense, without know that fact that I knew the kid's parents too. Without complete information that I had given you, you had make the wrong conclusion hence ending at nowhere.
In the commando accident, what I heard in the gym (where regulars' handout) was that that regular had committed a stupid mistake which was not a good image for CDO. It was not right for me to talk about military secrets in the public. And hence I had suggested you to find out the details yourself. I admitted that I am not clear about the incidents' details; hence I was not making further comments on that.
In the commando inquiries, I really did not see the problem of "passing the name" to an SAF regular. You had interpreted it as a blackmailed/corruption, which I found it strange. To me, it was more likely that you had not done administration work before.
In the current incident, whether I was at HQ or at company line, how did it matter to me? Did it make any differences at all? Did it make me inferior or superior? For I had ORD for 8 years now. Besides I had not told you my vocation yet, and I only tell you that I worked in HQ. May be I was a cleaner back then working in HQ?
Does being bored = free? Wrong! I was bored with my report writing, but I still had tons of works to do.
Is it interesting to see some people going rounds in circles, figuring out a puzzle with missing pieces?
About the doctors' part, you are right in some sense, as doctors are very good actor. I do not deny that.
It just interesting, how can "registered psychologists" be so free to post into forum so often? Perhaps, the business needs improvements? Or "perhaps" you have pretending to be attentively typing the patients' complaint when in fact you are serving the internet?
Goosh! Soon you are accusing me of lying again for I have previously stated that I want you to post "concise statements". I can go on and on, for I can expand these sub-points to paragraphs then to chapters. But I decide to end here. Hope you realize by now that I can be extremely long-winded and details if I want to. But in cases where I have purposely drop out the fact, it does not mean I am lying.
You should know that a puzzle can only solve when you have been given complete/enough information. At times, you may deduce a conclusion, but you may be heading the wrong directions. In other cases, the first piece of evidence may already be misinterpreted (by miscommunications, typo errors.. ), hence the direction may be screwed. So it is important to not to make declaration statements, for it may be false.
-
Gedanken, Do you even realize that I have added several statements in my postings in order provoke you? Please say, YES.
-
Originally posted by Lokey:
You just like to truncate people's words . What I am saying is that you are making a fool of yourself. Because what I am saying is the Truth.
I do wish you’d make up your mind. First you ask for conciseness, and when you get it, you try to worm your way out by bleating about truncation, you coward. The fact of the matter is that you chuck truckloads of meaningless trivia in your stories, presumably in the hope of throwing the reader off your trail of bullshit.
By the way, academic boards and clients paying hundreds of thousands of dollars have absolutely no problem with my conciseness. You're just the one who's too retarded to read.
You just keep claiming you’re telling the truth (with a capital T, no less – do you think you’re Christ or Mohammed now?). I’ll just keep exposing your lies. The game goes on.Originally posted by Lokey:In the previous gangster incident, you had gone on uttering your nonsense, without know that fact that I knew the kid's parents too. Without complete information that I had given you, you had make the wrong conclusion hence ending at nowhere.Oh, so you know the parents? So what? Did they ask you to come along and save their son?
More bullshit.Originally posted by Lokey:In the commando accident, what I heard in the gym (where regulars' handout) was that that regular had committed a stupid mistake which was not a good image for CDO. It was not right for me to talk about military secrets in the public. And hence I had suggested you to find out the details yourself. I admitted that I am not clear about the incidents' details; hence I was not making further comments on that.Ah, now the truth is starting to come out! I knew all this prodding would lead to a confession.
Based upon what you overheard in a gym, you see fit to be enough of an expert to pronounce your “advice” to the wide world. On top of that, having been challenged on your views, you go running home to momma and claim “military secrets”. Wake up, stupid – OSA does not cover locker room gossip. And no, OSA is not the ops officer.
That’s how flimsy things are for you, and with your nonexistent “secrets” excuse, you’re nothing but a yellow dog.
Originally posted by Lokey:In the commando inquiries, I really did not see the problem of "passing the name" to an SAF regular. You had interpreted it as a blackmailed/corruption, which I found it strange. To me, it was more likely that you had not done administration work before.Hey, you’re the one who was talking about “under table”, and it’s not just a case of “passing a name”. Or are you now admitting that you were exaggerating when you stated:
Originally posted by Lokey:If you wan to get in commando, whether it is under table or above table, I can get you in.Tell me how that statement doesn’t mean that you’re claiming decisive influence over the SAF’s selection processes. Come on, I’d love to see how you try and worm your way out of this one.
Originally posted by Lokey:May be I was a cleaner back then working in HQ?
Now that, gumdrop, is perfectly believable. There’s no possibility of you being fit for any other responsibilities. Even so, beoing the sloppy fool that you are, I bet you still got bollocked by the CSM for leaving stains on the floor.
Originally posted by Lokey:Does being bored = free? Wrong! I was bored with my report writing, but I still had tons of works to do.
And yet you spend time posting your fantasies here. You’re free enough to brag to me about how busy you are. Nuff said.
Originally posted by Lokey:Is it interesting to see some people going rounds in circles, figuring out a puzzle with missing pieces?
No, but it sure as hell is entertaining exposing your bullshit.
Originally posted by Lokey:About the doctors' part, you are right in some sense, as doctors are very good actor. I do not deny that.And yet you see fit to tell a doctor about how doctors behave. You really don’t know your lowly place in the world, son.
Originally posted by Lokey:It just interesting, how can "registered psychologists" be so free to post into forum so often? Perhaps, the business needs improvements? Or "perhaps" you have pretending to be attentively typing the patients' complaint when in fact you are serving the internet?I refer to my comments about you not knowing how people well above your pathetic station in life operate. While in your menial field you probably have a supervisor watching over your shoulder while you pretend to work, my work is charged by output, and rest assured that on any given day, that charge rate exceeds your pitiful monthly salary.
You probably still don’t see it, so I’ll spell it out for you. I do more than enough to keep the Bollinger and wagyu on the table, and because I’m pretty fucking good at what I do, unlike you I don’t have to slave away and wayang to keep from getting spanked by the boss.
Originally posted by Lokey:Goosh! Soon you are accusing me of lying again for I have previously stated that I want you to post "concise statements". I can go on and on, for I can expand these sub-points to paragraphs then to chapters. But I decide to end here. Hope you realize by now that I can be extremely long-winded and details if I want to. But in cases where I have purposely drop out the fact, it does not mean I am lying.Concise, truncating. If you don’t pick a side, you end up buttfucking yourself every which way.
You can write whatever you want, but as the tête-à-têtes between you and I have already shown, the vast majority of it is irrelevant trivia. I said it before, I’ll say it again, you’re just attempting to muddy the water to the point where the reader fails to identify your bullshit. I take my entertainment is peeling all that crap away and exposing your putrid lies at the core.
Originally posted by Lokey:You should know that a puzzle can only solve when you have been given complete/enough information. At times, you may deduce a conclusion, but you may be heading the wrong directions. In other cases, the first piece of evidence may already be misinterpreted (by miscommunications, typo errors.. ), hence the direction may be screwed. So it is important to not to make declaration statements, for it may be false.
Nope, you’re just plain lying. Just look at your latest post – once I’ve kicked you in the arse enough times to provide more information, it’s come out that your “advice” is based on what you overheard in the gym. In fact, the additional information has not only highlighted your tendency to go to the gym to not only pick up gangsters and go home to meet their parents, but also to eavesdrop on other people’s conversations and try to pass yourself off as being in a position to give “advice”. There’s no typo that can explain that away.
So go ahead, if you feel that providing more information would help your cause, feel free to do so, but just keep in mind that I’ll use it all to hang you because when all’s said and done, you’re just full of shit.
-
Originally posted by Lokey:
Gedanken, Do you even realize that I have added several statements in my postings in order provoke you? Please say, YES.
Whoa, this is the clincher. You already know you're going to be blown clean out of the water and you're already prempting your continued humiliation with prepackaged excuses. You're so pathetic you even plan for failure.
-
You all like doing Comprehension man..
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:By the way, academic boards and clients paying hundreds of thousands of dollars have absolutely no problem with my conciseness. You're just the one who's too retarded to read.
Does asking you to be concise = to you being not concise? I have no doubt that you can make concise statement and report. But whether it is logical right, it is questionable
Originally posted by Gedanken:You just keep claiming you’re telling the truth (with a capital T, no less – do you think you’re Christ or Mohammed now?). I’ll just keep exposing your lies. The game goes on.The Truth, can only be seen when I perform human transmutations, after opening the Gate of Truth. LOL.
Originally posted by Gedanken:Oh, so you know the parents? So what? Did they ask you to come along and save their son?The answer is YES.
Originally posted by Gedanken:Based upon what you overheard in a gym, you see fit to be enough of an expert to pronounce your “advice” to the wide world."What I heard" = to "overheard" = "eavesdropping" !?!? You failed ur GP?
Originally posted by Gedanken:On top of that, having been challenged on your views, you go running home to momma and claim “military secrets”.That is your own views.
Originally posted by Gedanken:Wake up, stupid – OSA does not cover locker room gossip. And no, OSA is not the ops officer.That is what you think. How do you prove that?
Originally posted by Gedanken:Tell me how that statement doesn’t mean that you’re claiming decisive influence over the SAF’s selection processes. Come on, I’d love to see how you try and worm your way out of this one.If you wan to get in commando, whether it is under table or above table, I can get you in
Do I include regardless of whatever fitness level, pes status, age…in my statement? Can’t you see in small print that “terms and conditions applied” after you stare at this statement for 24 hours continuously? You must not blink else you cannot see that statement. Or u now accusing ur own CDO boss from taking tributes and corrupted? ...I see ... I didn't know that...
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Now that, gumdrop, is perfectly believable. There’s no possibility of you being fit for any other responsibilities. Even so, beoing the sloppy fool that you are, I bet you still got bollocked by the CSM for leaving stains on the floor.LOL. There is auntie cleaner for our office and toilet. But of course, the cleanliness standard might not be as good as your bunk. I purposely mentioned that to see your response.
Originally posted by Gedanken:And yet you see fit to tell a doctor about how doctors behave. You really don’t know your lowly place in the world, son.LOL. I am aware that I am an expendable flea. Whether I am fit to comment it is not for you to judge.
Originally posted by Gedanken:I refer to my comments about you not knowing how people well above your pathetic station in life operate. While in your menial field you probably have a supervisor watching over your shoulder while you pretend to work, my work is charged by output, and rest assured that on any given day, that charge rate exceeds your pitiful monthly salary.Out of point.
Originally posted by Gedanken:You probably still don’t see it, so I’ll spell it out for you. I do more than enough to keep the Bollinger and wagyu on the table, and because I’m pretty fucking good at what I do, unlike you I don’t have to slave away and wayang to keep from getting spanked by the boss.Totally Out of point.
Originally posted by Gedanken:Concise, truncating. If you don’t pick a side, you end up buttfucking yourself every which way.Concise vs Truncating? Huh, what you talking? Concise =/= Truncate; Truncate =/= Concise. Concise is compressing the text, but the content stay the same. Truncate is cutting short the text, but the meaning may differ.
Originally posted by Gedanken:You can write whatever you want, but as the tête-à-têtes between you and I have already shown, the vast majority of it is irrelevant trivia. I said it before, I’ll say it again, you’re just attempting to muddy the water to the point where the reader fails to identify your bullshit. I take my entertainment is peeling all that crap away and exposing your putrid lies at the core.Carry on
Originally posted by Gedanken:Nope, you’re just plain lying. Just look at your latest post – once I’ve kicked you in the arse enough times to provide more information, it’s come out that your “advice” is based on what you overheard in the gym. In fact, the additional information has not only highlighted your tendency to go to the gym to not only pick up gangsters and go home to meet their parents, but also to eavesdrop on other people’s conversations and try to pass yourself off as being in a position to give “advice”. There’s no typo that can explain that away.Wrong. You are making up statements. Does "knowing the parents" = "what you have mentioned"? Do "what I heard" = "eavesdropping"? Are u not the one who teach me not to drive to conclusion by looking at presented facts? And also not to derivate other conclusions based on just the presented facts? Aren’t you now trying to make up a story? Aren’t you slapping your mouth now?
Originally posted by Gedanken:So go ahead, if you feel that providing more information would help your cause, feel free to do so, but just keep in mind that I’ll use it all to hang you because when all’s said and done, you’re just full of shit.Failed to plan = plan to fail. Not to worry about me, Sir. I have allocated time slots for Sgforum now. So stay tune. And I look forward for your next reply
Your love, Lokey
-
Originally posted by Lokey:
Does asking you to be concise = to you being not concise?
If you thought I was already being concise, why ask me to be concise? Are you blind, stupid, or just lying as usual? One thing's for sure, you're being an absolute hypocrite in questioning my being logical.
Fucked yourself again.
Originally posted by Lokey:The answer is YES.
Why did you choose to say you know the parents when the pertinent point is simply that they asked for your help? It all smells oh-so wrong.
In any case, have you got a good track record of bringing wayward gangsters to the straight and narrow? If not, what would possess them to ask you for help? Are they as stupid as you?Originally posted by Lokey:"What I heard" = to "overheard" = "eavesdropping" !?!? You failed ur GP?
Oh, this is good. Let's take this from both angles.
First, you heard this in a gym. People (including yourself) move around to different stations, weights are being dropped, treadmills are going, and you're trying to tell me that you simply "overheard" the conversation without making efforts to pick up what was being said? Bullshit.
Just to humour you, let's just say that it was overhearing and not eavesdropping. Based upon a fragment that you picked up, you see fit to provide "advice" about how combat soldiers, not being one yourself, should train? Bullshit.
Fucked yourself again.Originally posted by Lokey:That is your own views.
No, it's not. The objective facts shown in this thread show that when your "advice" was challenged, you declined to expand and fell back on the excuse of "military secrets" that do not apply in this case since all you've got is a scrap of a conversation in a gym.
Originally posted by Lokey:That is what you think. How do you prove that?
Here's your proof: http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/non_version/cgi-bin/cgi_getdata.pl?actno=1935-REVED-213&doctitle=OFFICIAL%20SECRETS%20ACT%0A&date=latest&method=whole
Tell me where your "overhearing" fits into this picture, stupid. Your locker-room gossip is in no way shape or form covered by OSA, so you can shove your "military secrets" bullshit up your arse. You're not that fucking important.
Fucked yourself again.Originally posted by Lokey:Do I include regardless of whatever fitness level, pes status, age…in my statement? Can’t you see in small print that “terms and conditions applied” after you stare at this statement for 24 hours continuously? You must not blink else you cannot see that statement.
So you're a fucking liar by omission then. Colour me surprised.
Originally posted by Lokey:Or u now accusing ur own CDO boss from taking tributes and corrupted? ...I see ... I didn't know that...
First, the officers I mentioned are not my bosses - they're from my batch when I was serving. Second, unless these officers are part of your mysterious "circle", I am making no such accusation against them. So, are they part of your "circle"? If so, please specify which officers, and I will refer your answer to them.
Originally posted by Lokey:Whether I am fit to comment it is not for you to judge.
Yes it is. I'm a doctor, you're not. You know nothing about it and you're way out of line imposing your fantasies on something you know nothing about.
Originally posted by Lokey:Out of point.
Originally posted by Lokey:Totally Out of point.
Really? My statements were in response to your questions:
Originally posted by Lokey:It just interesting, how can "registered psychologists" be so free to post into forum so often? Perhaps, the business needs improvements? Or "perhaps" you have pretending to be attentively typing the patients' complaint when in fact you are serving the internet?
I simply told you the way it is, which was necessary given your blithering ignorance. If it is out of point, then you're the one who made it so by asking the questions.
Fucked yourself again.Originally posted by Lokey:Concise vs Truncating? Huh, what you talking? Concise =/= Truncate; Truncate =/= Concise. Concise is compressing the text, but the content stay the same. Truncate is cutting short the text, but the meaning may differ.
Exactly. I was being concise, but you're making excuses by saying that I was truncating.
Fucked yourself again.Originally posted by Lokey:Wrong. You are making up statements. Does "knowing the parents" = "what you have mentioned"? Do "what I heard" = "eavesdropping"? Are u not the one who teach me not to drive to conclusion by looking at presented facts? And also not to derivate other conclusions based on just the presented facts? Aren’t you now trying to make up a story? Aren’t you slapping your mouth now?
Once again, look at the responses in this thread. I've simply highlighted the gaps and self-contradictions in what you've posted, ergo it is all factual.
Like I said, I'm giving you plenty of rope to keep posting and as above, I'll keep hanging you with it. -
Are you a registered psychologist or psychiatrist? i remembered that you have mentioned that you have taken a master or specialist course after your psychology Bach. in Aus? But that does not make you a doctor? Unless you have a MBBS or doctorate. I have purposely spell out "doctors" previously. I have mentioned to you about getting your phd. and the word "doctors" several times. To see you responds about that.
I purposely want to leave some. I know that you dont know about the relationships of the parent and son with me, what is topic's details with the regular in gym, and how my personal life operations. And you have added pepper and chilly, without knowing what am I cooking. Please stop making up stories based on your imaginations.
-
Originally posted by Lokey:
Are you a registered psychologist or psychiatrist? i remembered that you have mentioned that you have taken a master or specialist course after your psychology Bach. in Aus? But that does not make you a doctor? Unless you have a MBBS or doctorate. I have purposely spell out "doctors" previously. I have mentioned to you about getting your phd. and the word "doctors" several times. To see you responds about that.
Whoa, you really need to clean up your grammar (especially your use of punctuations) because it's completely garbled what you're trying to say.
Before I respond, I just need to clarify - are you saying that I am, or am not, a doctor?
-
Meh, actually, I don't need to hear your sob stories about your linguistic imcompetence, so I'll cut to the chase. I've held the title of Doctor since 2002, and I don't know where you got the idea that I did a Masters - I skipped the masters and went straight to the doctorate.
-
Originally posted by Lokey:I purposely want to leave some. I know that you dont know about the relationships of the parent and son with me, what is topic's details with the regular in gym, and how my personal life operations. And you have added pepper and chilly, without knowing what am I cooking. Please stop making up stories based on your imaginations.
Nice try. I'll tell you the way it is: you make up a story, I point out the holes in the story, and then you go, "Oh shit, forgot that part!", and make up the next part of the story.
Now, you might say that my explanation is no more plausible than yours, and fact is, I'd agree that it's no more plausible.
The only problem for you is that while you've been making up other parts of the story, you've forgotten about all of the lies that you've told to date and you've created a whole lot of inconsistencies that do in fact demonstrate that you're lying.
I'm not sure if you're the one I said this to before, but I'll say it again: do make sure that you never have to go to court - you'll go in for jaywalking and get hung for murder.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Yes it is. I'm a doctor, you're not. You know nothing about it and you're way out of line imposing your fantasies on something you know nothing about.
Originally posted by Gedanken:Meh, actually, I don't need to hear your sob stories about your linguistic imcompetence, so I'll cut to the chase. I've held the title of Doctor since 2002, and I don't know where you got the idea that I did a Masters - I skipped the masters and went straight to the doctorate.
In the few previous posting, I am stunned by your statements when you mention that you are a doctor. You say it yourself; you have achieved the title of Doctor. So "Doctor" is a title, similar to “Minster”, “Sir”, and “Lord”. So when people address you, they will address you as Doctor with the name or Dr. with the name. The PhD holder themselves don’t address themselves as doctor. Just like I don’t address myself as “I am a Mister”. Is it funny when Sir Newton addresses himself as “I am a Sir”?
Only a medical doctor can call himself a “doctor” referring to “doctor” refers to an occupation. But if you ask a MBBS graduate, he will reply you that he is a house officer, s.house officer, surgeon, GP and so on. It is rare that he will reply you saying that “I am a doctor”. The word “doctor” is really for laymen to call them. Not for them to address themselves.
For PhD holder, usually, they will not call themselves as doctors, even though, doctor also refer to a person who has been awarded a doctor's degree. But usually, it is written as “he is a Doctor of Philosophy.” Or he will say, “I am a PhD holder, post-doc, prof, specialist and so on.”
The way you express your statement is odd.
FYI, I really meant "medical doctors" in my previous posting. As “PhD holder” is nothing to me.
Setting that aside, I am also stunned that you mention that “your batch boy is a S1 officer in CDO camp”. I remember you say that you are from CJC and I assume that you have entered NS as a JC commando batch. Given that you claim to have obtained the title of Doctor in 2002. I assume that you have taken 3 years Bach., 4 years PhD. You should ORD when you are in 1995? Then you should be 36 years old now. So you are telling that your batch boy is now also 36 years old, degree holder, officer, and is still stuck as a S1 officer as a Maj or LTC in a unit camp?
My cousin is a SAF farmer, has already been a 1 years platoon officer in Armor before disruption for uni, 1 year company officer in Armor and recently post to CMPB for special project. The other friend of mine is a SAF scholar is now doing a company officer as CPT. And he have also recently received posting to Mindef. Why your batch boy is still sucked in CDO camp? Is it because CDO officers are considered as high profile or otherwise?
Do I forget or I have purposely leave it out for my story? I do remember that you have mentioned that you have taken a specialist course which makes you distinguishable from other psychologists. I also remember that in order to be a registered psychologist in Singapore, you need to log at least 800 hours of supervised practical experiences (about 6 mons to 1 yr ) and I am wondering, how can you go private, at the same time, be a registered psychologist. Unless, you have left immediately after you have clocked your hours, which show that you are inexperienced in counselling.
There are many things that you have mentioned previously in all your postings does not make sense to me. Your behavior and expression does not match your status and claim.
Originally posted by Gedanken:Originally posted by Gedanken: I refer to my comments about you not knowing how people well above your pathetic station in life operate. While in your menial field you probably have a supervisor watching over your shoulder while you pretend to work, my work is charged by output, and rest assured that on any given day, that charge rate exceeds your pitiful monthly salary.
Out of point.
Originally posted by Gedanken: You probably still don’t see it, so I’ll spell it out for you. I do more than enough to keep the Bollinger and wagyu on the table, and because I’m pretty fucking good at what I do, unlike you I don’t have to slave away and wayang to keep from getting spanked by the boss.
Totally Out of point.
I said that these statements were “out of point” because you like an “A level” grad mocking a “Pri 5” student for not obtaining his “A” level cert. How funny was that? When you obtain your title of Doctor in 2002, I have not even ORD. So what is the deal?
One of my colleagues is a registered psychologist, herself and she has already published 6 BOOKS now. And she has never claimed herself as a doctor and on top of that she is humble.
Are you even fit to talk to me? Are you what you claimed? Then show me your fantastic publication in the “Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, I think its IF is not low. Do you know what is IF, doctor?
-
Ah well, if you insist on continuing to humiliate yourself ...
Originally posted by Lokey:In the few previous posting, I am stunned by your statements when you mention that you are a doctor. You say it yourself; you have achieved the title of Doctor. So "Doctor" is a title, similar to “Minster”, “Sir”, and “Lord”. So when people address you, they will address you as Doctor with the name or Dr. with the name. The PhD holder themselves don’t address themselves as doctor. Just like I don’t address myself as “I am a Mister”. Is it funny when Sir Newton addresses himself as “I am a Sir”?
Only a medical doctor can call himself a “doctor” referring to “doctor” refers to an occupation. But if you ask a MBBS graduate, he will reply you that he is a house officer, s.house officer, surgeon, GP and so on. It is rare that he will reply you saying that “I am a doctor”. The word “doctor” is really for laymen to call them. Not for them to address themselves.
For PhD holder, usually, they will not call themselves as doctors, even though, doctor also refer to a person who has been awarded a doctor's degree. But usually, it is written as “he is a Doctor of Philosophy.” Or he will say, “I am a PhD holder, post-doc, prof, specialist and so on.”
The way you express your statement is odd.
As usual, you only present the part of the story that your limited imagination can encompass. All of the above behaviour would be warranted upon the presumption that both the title holder and the layperson are in at least broad agreement about the implications of the title. However, when an obnoxious fucking lowlife cockroach presumes to dictate how doctors should behave, he needs to be shown the facts of life in a completely unambiguois manner.
Originally posted by Lokey:Setting that aside, I am also stunned that you mention that “your batch boy is a S1 officer in CDO camp”. I remember you say that you are from CJC and I assume that you have entered NS as a JC commando batch. Given that you claim to have obtained the title of Doctor in 2002. I assume that you have taken 3 years Bach., 4 years PhD. You should ORD when you are in 1995? Then you should be 36 years old now. So you are telling that your batch boy is now also 36 years old, degree holder, officer, and is still stuck as a S1 officer as a Maj or LTC in a unit camp?
My cousin is a SAF farmer, has already been a 1 years platoon officer in Armor before disruption for uni, 1 year company officer in Armor and recently post to CMPB for special project. The other friend of mine is a SAF scholar is now doing a company officer as CPT. And he have also recently received posting to Mindef. Why your batch boy is still sucked in CDO camp? Is it because CDO officers are considered as high profile or otherwise?
Yes, it is unusual that my batch boy should be S1 at this time. Suffice to say that there's a very good reason for it - guys from CDO should know exactly what that reason is.
Here’s the interesting part, though. Just a short while ago you were proclaiming the lack of importance of officer roles, and now you have gone as far as to map career progression with age?
So, were you lying then, or are you lying now? Either way, you’re a liar.Originally posted by Lokey:I do remember that you have mentioned that you have taken a specialist course which makes you distinguishable from other psychologists. I also remember that in order to be a registered psychologist in Singapore, you need to log at least 800 hours of supervised practical experiences (about 6 mons to 1 yr ) and I am wondering, how can you go private, at the same time, be a registered psychologist. Unless, you have left immediately after you have clocked your hours, which show that you are inexperienced in counselling.
Well, am I practicing in Singapore? Pretty dumb set of assumptions to apply if I'm not, isn't it? Never mind, there's plenty more to show how little you know.
The fact is that the Singaporean rules are actually relatively lax. In Australia it's a minimum of 120 days as opposed to Singapore's 100. For the doctorate, 200 days was required.
The one mistake you made was to assume that the supervised practice had to run in sequence with the degree. In fact, it takes place concurrently.
Also, I don't do counselling. There isn't anywhere near enough money involved to get me out of bed.Originally posted by Lokey:Do I forget or I have purposely leave it out for my story?
Like I said, the question's moot. The inconsistencies in the stories that you make up make it obvious that you're lying.
Originally posted by Lokey:I said that these statements were “out of point” because you like an “A level” grad mocking a “Pri 5” student for not obtaining his “A” level cert. How funny was that? When you obtain your title of Doctor in 2002, I have not even ORD. So what is the deal?
So, you know how pitiful you are, and yet you see yourself fit to tell people well above your station how to behave? You needed to be put in your place, so it's not out of point at all. Like I said, since you pointed things down this track, even if it was out of point, you're the one who did it.
Originally posted by Lokey:One of my colleagues is a registered psychologist,
Whoa, hang on a minute.
Now you admit in the previous paragraph how lowly you are ranked, and now you refer to a registered psychologist as a “colleague”? Are you puffing yourself up again, or does this person simply not exist? I’m inclined towards the latter. Anyway, just for laughs, I’ll look at the rest of what you wrote.Originally posted by Lokey:herself and she has already published 6 BOOKS now. And she has never claimed herself as a doctor and on top of that she is humble.
Are you even fit to talk to me? Are you what you claimed? Then show me your fantastic publication in the “Behavioral and Brain Sciences”, I think its IF is not low. Do you know what is IF, doctor?
Oh, puh-lease. Publishing books? Do you think that’s what it’s all about?
I’m a practitioner, and publications are at best a marketing tool. As it is, I’ve got more than enough new business based upon the quality of existing work, so writing books really isn’t necessary.
Let me put it simply for you. If I go up to a client and say, “Hey, I wrote this book”, they’ll say, “That’s nice. I’ll buy a copy and pass it on to my Deputy HR Manager’s Assistant’s PA’s intern to read”. On the other hand, when one of my clients tells someone from another company that I just helped them lop off over a million bucks in workers’ compensation claims, the other guy’s going to come banging on my door with a bucketload of cash in hand. Why, in your addled imagination, would I waste my effort getting published in “Behavioral and Brain Sciences”?Also, the question is whether you are fit to talk to me – I’m richer and more highly qualified than you are, and I’ll bet I’m a whole lot better looking too, so there’s no question that I’m the one you look up to. Maybe if you kiss my ass enough, I might feel pity and order a pack of fries from you, loser boy.
By the way, before you continue crying about the way I treat you, keep in mind that plenty of people on this forum know me in person, qualifications and all, and we get along just fine. You’re the only one I treat this way because you’re an obnoxious scumbag who really simply doesn’t know his place. -
So it is true that CDO officers are being promoted very slowly in SAF?
-
I don't know what promotion rates in other units are, so I really couldn't say if promotion rates are fast or slow in CDO.
Vis-a-vis my batch boy, as I've mentioned before, there's a good reason that he's progressed slowly. The CDO guys will know why I'm not going to go into this with an outsider.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
I don't know what promotion rates in other units are, so I really couldn't say if promotion rates are fast or slow in CDO.
Vis-a-vis my batch boy, as I've mentioned before, there's a good reason that he's progressed slowly. The CDO guys will know why I'm not going to go into this with an outsider.
if I am correct. It is because usually CDO officer is promoted from within. Meaning he has to go through CDO BMT, to be a commando, then go to OCS then to be an CDO officer. But he has to sign on in order to be a regular CDO officer. But how many people managed to sign on each year in CDO. So since there is no juniors, the seniors have to stay in the CDO camp. Am I right?
-
Lat time I checked, there wasn't any shortage - in fact, our guys were doing tours in other units because there weren't enough posts within CDO.
Then again, times may have changed - ask some of the guys who have more recent experience.
-
Gedanken's spot on. The trend is still the same.
Cdo Officers are doing their tours to fulfil the requirements for promotion outside CDO.
-
Originally posted by RedHood:
Gedanken's spot on. The trend is still the same.
Cdo Officers are doing their tours to fulfil the requirements for promotion outside CDO.
So why is it that ... his batch boy who is now 36 years plus is still an S1 officer in CDO camp?Yes, I am kapo. I am asking this because I dont understand. A known person of mine is an ex-CDO NSF officer who have chosen to be an diligent accountant over a tough army guy.
If you look at him, I would hire him as a body guard, personal trainer, TKD coach but not as an auditor, accountant. (You get the picture?). His personality also does not fit into his job.
Consider salary, prospect, personality, fitness it does not make sense for him not to take the job. So why?
-
Why? Because the sky is so high lor.
There's no contention that this officer's career is not as far along as it would be under normal circumstances, and beyond that yes, you are a kaypo.
I'll leave it to the other CDO guys to tell you why if they see fit, but as far as I'm concerned, not is it only none of your business, but with your tendency towards irresponsible and irrational speculation (take your bizarre "no juniors" theory for example), I'd count on you to make a dog's breakfast of any information provided to you.On another note, please provide data on what an accountant's personality is. Or are you bullshitting yet again?
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Why? Because the sky is so high lor.
There's no contention that this officer's career is not as far along as it would be under normal circumstances, and beyond that yes, you are a kaypo.
I'll leave it to the other CDO guys to tell you why if they see fit, but as far as I'm concerned, not is it only none of your business, but with your tendency towards irresponsible and irrational speculation (take your bizarre "no juniors" theory for example), I'd count on you to make a dog's breakfast of any information provided to you.On another note, please provide data on what an accountant's personality is. Or are you bullshitting yet again?
Of course it is your business. It is like telling me you have a trump card. Yes. you have a trump card. Then when you flipped over. It is the ten of diamonds.
I say I REALLY dont know what is S1... Do you see the the word "really" has twisted the statement's meaning a little compare to "I dont know what is S1..."
I know "personality" is a big term in psychology. But my "personality" just means an introvert vs extrovert. Dont think too much on this.
-
Originally posted by Lokey:
Of course it is your business. It is like telling me you have a trump card. Yes. you have a trump card. Then when you flipped over. It is the ten of diamonds.
I say I REALLY dont know what is S1... Do you see the the word "really" has twisted the statement's meaning a little compare to "I dont know what is S1..."
Yes, of course it is my business, and it's none of yours.
Yes, I have a trump card. You tell me you can influence manpower decisions, I tell you that the guy in charge of manpower is a personal friend of mine. It is, in so many words, a trump card because I have a source who can bebunk your bullshit claims.
The S1's age has NOTHING to do with the fact that you are claiming to be able to influence manpower decisions and I am telling you that you're full of shit - regardless of all your bullshit, the man is still the S1, to the extent that other Commandos in this thread know who precisely I'm talking about. Put very, very simply, in terms maybe even you can understand, why this officer is holding the S1 at his age is none of your business.
Originally posted by Lokey:I know "personality" is a big term in psychology. But my "personality" just means an introvert vs extrovert. Dont think too much on this.Ah, very good. You are finally starting to know your place. Don't ever fucking let me catch you pretending to know anything about psychology anymore, understand?
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Yes, of course it is my business, and it's none of yours.
Yes, I have a trump card. You tell me you can influence manpower decisions, I tell you that the guy in charge of manpower is a personal friend of mine. It is, in so many words, a trump card because I have a source who can bebunk your bullshit claims.
The S1's age has NOTHING to do with the fact that you are claiming to be able to influence manpower decisions and I am telling you that you're full of shit - regardless of all your bullshit, the man is still the S1, to the extent that other Commandos in this thread know who precisely I'm talking about. Put very, very simply, in terms maybe even you can understand, why this officer is holding the S1 at his age is none of your business.
Ah, very good. You are finally starting to know your place. Don't ever fucking let me catch you pretending to know anything about psychology anymore, understand?
Knowing my place has nothing to do with my statement on the part about psychology. I discover that you are so well-educated that you cannot understand what I have said. So I still have in put myself into your shoes to tell you, "dont think so much".
And it is you who misinterpret my statement and have ignorantly linked it to "influences" on manpower decisions. I dont know, how can you be so imaginative? If I am that "powerful" as you thought, why will I even be bothered by some silly teenage's sudden interest? Who is that boy who will move me? Strange.
-
Originally posted by Lokey:
Knowing my place has nothing to do with my statement on the part about psychology. I discover that you are so well-educated that you cannot understand what I have said. So I still have in put myself into your shoes to tell you, "dont think so much".
You stupid motherfucker, you still don't know your place, so I have to remind you of the facts.
YOU ARE A FUCKING NOBODY.
YOU ARE NOT A DIVER.
YOU ARE NOT A COMMANDO.
YOU ARE NOT A GUARDSMAN.
STILL YOU ARE IN THIS THREAD TALKING LIKE YOU ARE KING FUCK SUPER-RAMBO SOF GREEN BERET ULTRA SEAL TWENTY-STAR FUCKING GENERAL.
IN OTHER WORDS YOU ARE A LYING COCKSUCKING CUNT.
SIMILARLY YOU KNOW SWEET FUCK-ALL ABOUT PSYCHOLOGY, BUT YOU ARE ALL OVER THIS FUCKIG FORUM PLAYING DR FUCKING PHIL.
IN OTHER WORDS YOU ARE A LYING COCKSUCKING CUNT.
IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR YOU, YOU FUCKING INBRED RETARD? OR DO I HAVE TO DRAW IT IN CRAYON FOR YOU AND GET YOUR MOMMY (WHO DESERVES A TIGHT SLAP FOR PRODUCING A PIECE OF SHIT LIKE YOU) TO HELP YOU READ IT?
Originally posted by Lokey:And it is you who misinterpret my statement and have ignorantly linked it to "influences" on manpower decisions. I dont know, how can you be so imaginative? If I am that "powerful" as you thought, why will I even be bothered by some silly teenage's sudden interest? Who is that boy who will move me? Strange.
You know what, you've made some pretty good points there. First, I have in fact understated the case by saying that you claim to influence the system. You in fact stated:
Originally posted by Lokey:If you wan to get in commando, whether it is under table or above table, I can get you in.
Whoa! Stop the presses! Am I in the presence of greatness here? Hey, over, under table, up your fucking arse sideways, you can get people into Commandos? Not just "may be able to"? Are you so fucking powerful that you so definitely CAN get them in?
WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE, YOU LYING PIECE OF SHIT?
And while we're at it, why are you trying to impress this boy? Doesn't anyone at your "gym" want to fuck you up the ass anymore?
-
lokey=eagle??
but why???