Everyone Has A Role - Flamed
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
What a coincidence. Sincerely, you as well. you also remind me of a certain member in this forum. Not only that, you remind of another member of two other forums!!!!! Dare you state your vocation..? tell me. Then who knows? i may find out who you are. i think its quite amusing how you think anyone in a forum will entertain you. Why dun you tell me the length of your penis. cos I suspect you've done some gender change procedure so to prove to me that you haven't pls tell me your LJ length.
Funny you suddenly brought up the subject of penis length....sudden attack of brain fart and now you reminising about the weekend tryst you had with the General? I am sure you get passed around regularly. so thats why the length of your penis is no secret among the who's who of SAF. You implied that you've done NS, so i ask your vocation. what the big deal?
And no i am not worked up, why should i be? You talk as if you been in the military for donkey yrs and as if you are the subject matter expert in "Keng" or "Kengsters" The whole entire thread is not about the existence of kengsters, We all know and must have known one during NS. Hell, it must have been part of SAF culture from day 1.
This thread is about your DEFINITION of "keng" and "kengsters" and how you accuse without basis or facts, that guys with PES lower than A/B or CSS vocations are 90% keng or kengsters. And i believe its moral duty of someone to "educate" you, albeit using strong language on the importance of these lower PES soldiers and CSS soldiers. You can have your own thoughts, but posting crap like this only cause others to zero on you and your bullshit.
its been nice, pissing you off to make you show your shortcomings and uh, orientation. but i think this thread has run its course.
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
Errr I was the one who highlighted to you that its your choice to agree or disagree with other people's views and if you don't, you could bugger off. You have no right to tell others what they feel is wrong just because you don't agree with it. You were the one who began harassing me for my views about kengsters. I didn't approach you. I asked you WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE, because YOU went around harassing others for having alternative views from you in a forum.
I asked you WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE to censure other people's views because you're NOT EVEN A MOD. Me narcissistic? Or you who don't stomach dissenting views from your narcissistic self?
if you don't believe there are kengsters, or if you don't believe it's my experience, then DON'T! Thats the way forums work. I never forced you to believe me. You have the choice to not participate in what you disbelieve. But you're just too stupid to know that.
Oh, don't cry, Nellie.
Now where, oh where, did I tell you that what you feel is wrong? Do please provide a quote. Or are you making things up again?
Now, I have no problems whatsoever in agreeing with you. Of course I could agree or disagree, of course I could choose to bugger off, of course I could choose not to participate.
I just choose not to. Until you provide facts to back up your claims and *snort* "experiences", you ain't nuthin but a liar, and I choose to be here to mention that again and again as long as your crap continues.
Life's a bitch, ain't it?
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Ah, I see. You can't handle ambiguity, and you wet yourself when you haven't had instructions on which way to go. No surprise, really, given your limited intellect.
Okay, if you want a clear statement, here's one: you got no proof, you're TALKING COCK!
Oh, actually, here's another hard and fast one for ya. While you're TALKING COCK, you're saying that other people are talking cock, so that makes you a HYPOCRITE.
That concrete enough for you, honeybunch?
I am heartened by your bravery.
Now can you prove it?Please prove what you said above. I'll wait for you patiently also. -
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Until you provide facts to back up your claims and *snort* "experiences", you ain't nuthin but a liar, and I choose to be here to mention that again and again as long as your crap continues.
Jessie, you do not believe that there are kengsters and you ask to see proof that there are kengsters and until then, there aren't kengsters?
you ask to see virtual proof in a forum about malingerers in the SAF in action reporting sick and until then, you can say anyone who says that is a liar??? Hahahahahahhaah!!!!!! -
When asked for proof, the best plea you could come up with is:
Originally posted by Gloater:those kengsters are unfortunately my experience. That was the SAF I know. It's a fact that thats my experience.
Oooh, boo hoo- those are your own words, and your excuse is as lame as a Cambodian minefield dancer. Maybe that's the kind of thing that impresses the schoolboys you pick up, but at the end of the day, it's just your word. Still no proof, and you're still TALKING COCK! Oh, and while you're at that, you're still a HYPOCRITE!
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
Jessie, you do not believe that there are kengsters and you ask to see proof that there are kengsters and until then, there aren't kengsters?
you ask to see virtual proof in a forum about
malingerers in the SAF in action reporting sick and until then, you
can say anyone who says that is a liar??? Hahahahahahhaah!!!!!!No, I'm saying that YOU are a liar. Jeezus, your disability's worse than I feared - you can't even tell the difference between "you" and "anyone"?
Okay, time for you to receive some education on facts here. You quoted the following from my post:
Until you provide facts to back up your claims and *snort* "experiences", you ain't nuthin but a liar, and I choose to be here to mention that again and again as long as your crap continues.
Okay, now pay attention. I wrote: "you ain't nuthin but a liar", and the word "anyone" does not appear anywhere in that pasage.
So, by asking me "you can say anyone who says that is a liar???", you've gone and made an ass of yourself by reading things that aren't there and making crap up.
Lesson over. Glad to help.
-
Originally posted by Man!x:
This thread is about your DEFINITION of "keng" and "kengsters" and how you accuse without basis or facts, that guys with PES lower than A/B or CSS vocations are 90% keng or kengsters. And i believe its moral duty of someone to "educate" you, albeit using strong language on the importance of these lower PES soldiers and CSS soldiers. You can have your own thoughts, but posting crap like this only cause others to zero on you and your bullshit.
Show me when I said 90% of PES C & below soldiers are kengsters. i'd love to see you pull this out of your arse.
I said there are more kengsters concentrated in Pes C than Pes A/B. I said Pes A/B pool contains way fewer people who attempted to be downgraded and succeeded.
I said soldiers who try to get a downgrade based on a feigned illness angle for a Pes C, and those who succeed do become Pes C! I said most malingerers who succeed end up Pes C2 and below.
I said not all Pes C soldiers are malingerers. I even said kengsters are defined by only people who try to get Pes C though they're perfectly healthy and fit, and NOT soldiers who have a genuine medical issue.
I said many Pes C kengsters are in CSS.
if after a certain set of criteria is achieved, the soldier is question changes status to another or goes to a set of vocations after please explain to me how it's logically possible for this statement to be untrue. there are more kengsters concentrated in Pes C than Pes A/B
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
No, I'm saying that YOU are a liar. Jeezus, your disability's worse than I feared - you can't even tell the difference between "you" and "anyone"?
Okie so you meant this. But you can't prove it.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
When asked for proof, the best plea you could come up with is:
Oooh, boo hoo- those are your own words, and your excuse is as lame as a Cambodian minefield dancer. Maybe that's the kind of thing that impresses the schoolboys you pick up, but at the end of the day, it's just your word. Still no proof, and you're still TALKING COCK! Oh, and while you're at that, you're still a HYPOCRITE!
If you can't prove anything I quoted here, you're still TALKING COCK. you're still a HYPOCRITE!
-
Gloater, have you ever been in the army? Do you have any sound knowledge of military tactics and strategies. Such sweeping statements that CSSCOM servicemen and PES E & C Personnels are kengsters shows a lack of understanding.
If not for the CSSCOM units, the combat units will be wiped out within the first 24 hours of battle. An army needs a line of supply, maintenance and transport to function. Lets take the PES C vocation of a armor/turret technician as an example. In peace-time, they do major repair jobs and servicing of the armor vehicles. These are not easy jobs since most of the spares are extremely heavy. Even in base, quite a number of vehicles are in need of repair work due to combatants mistakes, wear and tear etc. In wartime or in the field, technicians provide on the spot repair (imagine using a crane to change engine/changing tracks in the muddy forest). I daresay its just as shiong (most likely more) as combat. If not for these Pes C Kengsters, our entire tank fleet wouldn't be a force to be reckoned with.
Ohh and you are also insulting our Medical Corps since you are alleging that they are unable to distinguish a true medical disease and a fake...
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
No, I'm saying that YOU are a liar. Jeezus, your disability's worse than I feared - you can't even tell the difference between "you" and "anyone"?
Okay, time for you to receive some education on facts here. You quoted the following from my post:
Okay, now pay attention. I wrote: "you ain't nuthin but a liar", and the word "anyone" does not appear anywhere in that pasage.
So, by asking me "you can say anyone who says that is a liar???", you've gone and made an ass of yourself by reading things that aren't there and making crap up.
Lesson over. Glad to help.
Retard, what is the difference between "anyone" and "YOU" here when you can't prove it? Sentence 1: anyone likes to keng. Sentence 2: YOU like to keng. The speaker would have to prove that "YOU" here likes to keng.
You is not distinct from anyone, unless you can prove it!!! You refers to a specific person. You is also a part of ANYONE until you can prove what you CLAIMED about "YOU" to separate the "you" from "everyone ELSE". DUH
So here. Jessie! You can't prove anything I quoted here, you're still TALKING COCK. you're still a HYPOCRITE!
-
When asked for proof, you come up this bullshit:
Originally posted by Gloater:those kengsters are unfortunately my experience. That was the SAF I know. It's a fact that thats my experience.
I'll turn your question back on you - who do YOU think you are that your "experience" counts as proof? TALK COCK!
-
Originally posted by grandmaster89:
Gloater, have you ever been in the army? Do you have any sound knowledge of military tactics and strategies. Such sweeping statements that CSSCOM servicemen and PES E & C Personnels are kengsters shows a lack of understanding.
If not for the CSSCOM units, the combat units will be wiped out within the first 24 hours of battle. An army needs a line of supply, maintenance and transport to function. Lets take the PES C vocation of a armor/turret technician as an example. In peace-time, they do major repair jobs and servicing of the armor vehicles. These are not easy jobs since most of the spares are extremely heavy. Even in base, quite a number of vehicles are in need of repair work due to combatants mistakes, wear and tear etc. In wartime or in the field, technicians provide on the spot repair (imagine using a crane to change engine/changing tracks in the muddy forest). I daresay its just as shiong (most likely more) as combat. If not for these Pes C Kengsters, our entire tank fleet wouldn't be a force to be reckoned with.
Ohh and you are also insulting our Medical Corps since you are alleging that they are unable to distinguish a true medical disease and a fake...
I never once said CCS is unimportant. Please note the difference between
sentence 1: "many kengsters who successfully get downgraded take on CSS vocations" and
sentence 2: "CSS is unimportant and the army can function without it".
CSS does not only consist of kengsters and downgraders. There are also Pes A people there you know?
Not all kengsters are Pes C. There are a lot who are Pes A and B in mono intake inf. Just that they didn't get Pes C9 they dream.
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
Retard, what is the difference between "anyone" and "YOU" here when you can't prove it? Sentence 1: anyone likes to keng. Sentence 2: YOU like to keng. The speaker would have to prove that "YOU" here likes to keng.
You is not distinct from anyone, unless you can prove it!!! You refers to a specific person. You is also a part of ANYONE until you can prove what you CLAIMED about "YOU" to separate the "you" from "everyone ELSE". DUH
So here. Jessie! You can't prove anything I quoted here, you're still TALKING COCK. you're still a HYPOCRITE!
Doesn't change the FACT that I said that YOU are a liar and did not mention the word "anyone" in the quoted post. If you can't get your head around this simple PROVEN FACT, it's no wonder that you're writing crap.
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
There are a lot who are Pes A and B in mono intake inf. Just that they didn't get Pes C9 they dream.
How many is "a lot"? Who are they (by your own measure please provide names, NRIC numbers and photos)? What's your proof that they dream of PES C9?
-
OK i get your drift. So just to clarify, have the CSSCOM units (eg AMBs) done a satisfactory job in supporting SAF?
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
When asked for proof, you come up this bullshit:
I'll turn your question back on you - who do YOU think you are that your "experience" counts as proof? TALK COCK!
When asked for proof, you come up this bullshit:
This is to show you how stupid you were to ask forumers for proof that their views are "correct". Gettit??
you have to say this back to me, because that's all you can say namby pamby Mary when a retard in a forum asks you anything as STUPID as this. TALK COCK!
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
When asked for proof, you come up this bullshit:
This is to show you how stupid you were to ask forumers for proof that their views are "correct". Gettit??
you have to say this back to me, because that's all you can say namby pamby Mary when a retard in a forum asks you anything as STUPID as this. TALK COCK!
Well, when I asked for proof, you crapped on about your "experience", with no facts to show that the kengsters you describe exist. Nothing stupid about pointing out that you still have no facts.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Doesn't change the FACT that I said that YOU are a liar and did not mention the word "anyone" in the quoted post. If you can't get your head around this simple PROVEN FACT, it's no wonder that you're writing crap.
Doesn't change the "fact"?? When you can't prove the difference between you and "anyone" in what you said, then the "fact" you dreamt of is NOT a "fact".
you can't prove what you said about "you", then "you" is a subset of "anyone"! IDIOT!
-
Originally posted by Gloater:
Doesn't change the "fact"?? When you can't prove the difference between you and "anyone" in what you said, then the "fact" you dreamt of is NOT a "fact".
you can't prove what you said about "you", then "you" is a subset of "anyone"! IDIOT!
No it's not. I'll go slowly so you can hopefully follow.
"You" is spelt Y-O-U.
""Anyone" is spelt A-N-Y-O-N-E.
They are not the same word. That is a fact.
I said YOU are a liar. I did not say "anyone" is a liar. That is a fact.
Moron.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Well, when I asked for proof, you crapped on about your "experience", with no facts to show that the kengsters you describe exist. Nothing stupid about pointing out that you still have no facts.
Hahah nothing stupid?! hahahaha! you had to give the same sorryarse response to me when I asked you the EXACT SAME THING you asked me. Which I knew would be the response you give!! Cos it's so damn stupid!!!!
You have no facts that there is no kengster, no facts that there are lots of people reporting sick in monointake, lots of kengsters there who dream of Pes C9! Cos it's my experience. you have no facts that I did not ever come across at least one kengster who reports sick in mono intake. NO FACT!! NO FACT!! NO FACT!!! MARY POPPINS! I say the same back to you! You have no fact that my experience is untrue. It's my fucking experience.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
No it's not. I'll go slowly so you can hopefully follow.
"You" is spelt Y-O-U.
""Anyone" is spelt A-N-Y-O-N-E.
They are not the same word. That is a fact.
I said YOU are a liar. I did not say "anyone" is a liar. That is a fact.
Moron.
Can you prove it??! Prove that "you" are a liar'
-
Anyway, enough distractions. I've allowed you to you to worm your way out of addressing the key issues for too long.
Originally posted by Gloater:But this does not change the fact that most kengsters are in combat service support no?
Fact? Where's your proof?
Originally posted by Gloater:Does it change the fact that you find many more kengsters among storemen and clerks than a 2nd yr mono intake in SIR? No.
Fact? Where's your proof?
Originally posted by Gloater:Does it change the fact that among downgraded men vs combat fit men, you find more fraudsters in the 1st group than you would in the 2nd? certainly not.
Fact? Where's your proof?
Originally posted by Gloater:Is there a shortage of chao kengs in the army who openly declare they are chao kengs?
Do you have proof that there is no shortage?
Originally posted by Gloater:There are a lot who are Pes A and B in mono intake inf. Just that they didn't get Pes C9 they dream.
How many is "a lot"? Who are they (by your own measure please provide names, NRIC numbers and photos)? What's your proof that they dream of PES C9?
-
You and Anyone are the same until you can prove the distinctness of "you" in the context. So faggot prove it. i wait for you patiently.
-
Originally posted by Gedanken:
Anyway, enough distractions. I've allowed you to you to worm your way out of addressing the key issues for too long.
Fact? Where's your proof?
Fact? Where's your proof?
Fact? Where's your proof?
Do you have proof that there is no shortage?
How many is "a lot"? Who are they (by your own measure please provide names, NRIC numbers and photos)? What's your proof that they dream of PES C9?
*Twiddles thumbs
I still waiting for you faggot.
You're trying to gag the free speech of others in a forum when they talk about their experiences and opinions with this stupid ruse of yours. NOT SO SIMPLE! people are entitled to say what they want. I want to say leh. How how?? You can't stop me!!!
THERE IS NO SHORTAGE OF KENGSTERS IN SAF. THERE ARE A LOT! A LOT!!!
THERE ARE KENGSTERS WHO ARE PES A TOO. PLENTY PLENTY AMONG THE MEN IN MONO INTAKE! THEY DID NOT GET PES C9 THEY DREAM. THEY SIMPLY REPORT SICK ALL THE TIME!
THESE KENGSTERS WISH THEY WERE PES C9 INSTEAD BUT THEY ARE NOT!!!
how?? how?? how?? neh neh ne boo boo. you cant stop me. you can't gag the free speech of others.