Reduce Servicing Years
-
TT I hafta agree....Originally posted by wuming78:even in the army technology is rapidly revolutionising the way battles are fought.
but tt is not to say tt it is a good reason for such a reduction.
But we can only speculate....and guys....no loose talk...
-
what the hell it has to come now.sometmimes i wonder..what abt pple who r poly/a-level grads but are not in combat or should i say commanding post and because of some medical problems,are in admin vocation.I tell u..it's a bloody waste of time letting the DXOs bully their way through and making them feel like cheap forced labourers when hell yeah deep inside they know these pple might be the powerful icon of the economy or the supporting icons one day..just a matter of time..ord..go u...study up the grades in the workforce and wola...hey dxo were'nt u the one who put me in the mud that made me look like a cheap labourer..when the SAF turns into 3G really beware of the job of yours..but dun come srying to me for employment
-
dont realli understand.. dxos are employees of saf, whereas nsfs are simply serving their ns obligations. care to clarify ur point?Originally posted by AXL246:what the hell it has to come now.sometmimes i wonder..what abt pple who r poly/a-level grads but are not in combat or should i say commanding post and because of some medical problems,are in admin vocation.I tell u..it's a bloody waste of time letting the DXOs bully their way through and making them feel like cheap forced labourers when hell yeah deep inside they know these pple might be the powerful icon of the economy or the supporting icons one day..just a matter of time..ord..go u...study up the grades in the workforce and wola...hey dxo were'nt u the one who put me in the mud that made me look like a cheap labourer..when the SAF turns into 3G really beware of the job of yours..but dun come srying to me for employment -
ask any admin vocationalist nsf and they will tell u how horrible lady dxos would treat nsf.