i think the medic is supposed to administer stop-gap measures rather than major lifesaving operations.Originally posted by react81:Just to play devil's advocate here, but the recent thread on combat medics have led me to think of this question. NOthing against combat medics, i am one myself. But how much does the soldier on the ground trust his medic?
Do you think your medic has the skills to patch you up when you are wounded? To know what to do, and to remain calm enough to do it? Would he be able to resussitate you should you collapse?
And i'm only talking about peace time.
Look forward to hearing your views.
i tink during war time everibody wld want to have the medics around but not now !!!!Originally posted by wuming78:i think the medic is supposed to administer stop-gap measures rather than major lifesaving operations.
well. whether the soldiers trust their medics or not, im sure they will rather have one than not have one at all!
in the medic's defence, venous cannulation is a skill that requires constant practice. For one, they are using one of the biggest damn needles around, and in school of military medcine, they would have done only 10, and probably missed about half of those. They just dont get the practice, unlike the MO, who would have done a few hundred (dare i say a thousand?... probably) before he set that plug on you.Originally posted by ColdMilk:the last time i was put on drip, they did topo for at least 10 minchanging hands among at least 4 medics ... n only until the MO arrived den they managed to find the right spot !!!
it was a veri painful n terrible experience
i agree! the medic is not going to be able to open up your chest and sew up that hole in your heart..etc, not even your regular MO would be able to do that.Originally posted by wuming78:i think the medic is supposed to administer stop-gap measures rather than major lifesaving operations.
well. whether the soldiers trust their medics or not, im sure they will rather have one than not have one at all!
Yes agreed with u about the bo chap attitude which most NSF have no matter with vocation u in......alot still have to play play and "war will never come" theory lah.....Originally posted by react81:i agree! the medic is not going to be able to open up your chest and sew up that hole in your heart..etc, not even your regular MO would be able to do that.
have you ever considered that the medic that you may have to depend on to save your life (even if just in training/peace time) many may have the same bo chap/cant care less attitude that many(but certainly not all) NSFs have..and that he may very well have been sleeping through CPR class
Kind of difficult bcosOriginally posted by I-like-flings(m):... but SAF should consider and try to post NSF to unit that is relevant to their course previously studied....![]()
dear react81, as a medic for me you must be able to proficently administrator your skills.Originally posted by react81:Just to play devil's advocate here, but the recent thread on combat medics have led me to think of this question. NOthing against combat medics, i am one myself. But how much does the soldier on the ground trust his medic?
Do you think your medic has the skills to patch you up when you are wounded? To know what to do, and to remain calm enough to do it? Would he be able to resussitate you should you collapse?
And i'm only talking about peace time.
Look forward to hearing your views.
Then change the test....we all now how stupid test are.....if the can pre-set ur unit or vocation b4 u even go BMT then i'm sure they can just have other test and match them to the best vocation related to their field of study right? what's the diff?Originally posted by baer:Kind of difficult bcos
i) Most postings are made prior to BMT based on famous "WH or not" test ratio and lateral changes are rare. I forget the breakdown of this ratio between education, family (surname Lee or not), performance at Situational test (for OCS entry), physical etc..
It's not everyone.. it's about those with specialised knowledge that can be found in SAF too.... e.g
ii) SAF basic building block is infantry platoon/battalion. Support arms added as required and then logistic tail etc. We cannot have everyone becoming what they did at poly, if not, not enuff foot soliders...
So?? dun get ur point here...with u keep older and especially in NS u will see alot of big shot being just a low rifles man or specialist....u dun expect them to be forever a fresh diploma or uni grad right... career advances...
iii) In my NS signal platoon in 2PDF, a lot of chief engineers, head of department etc. bcos at point of BMT POP they weren't there yet, so all got shoved into signals as lineman, runner etc (even if they can bearly pass their IPPT).
Medic, we LOVE them because who else we can turn to for Panadol etc.
you are supposed to be responsible too. if you are calm and trust the medic more. he can proficiently get through your vein.Originally posted by ColdMilk:i tink during war time everibody wld want to have the medics around but not now !!!!
i hate dem !!@#@#$#@$@#$@
the last time i was put on drip, they did topo for at least 10 minchanging hands among at least 4 medics ... n only until the MO arrived den they managed to find the right spot !!!
it was a veri painful n terrible experience
well he needs more tranining .... no one is perfect in this world. even as a sickbay ic for me at times i may also go bo boOriginally posted by gonegoose:This would have happened in early '03 on Tekong. BMTC Comd was visiting my company when we were having our field camp and as usual, went around scaring the SHIT out of everyone (he's a damn decent guy, but when your OC is only a LTA, 3 crabs out would scare the F*** out of anyone)
Anyway, he rolled up his sleeve and asked the medic to perform an IV drip on him. Of course, our ever competent medic thought that Lo Yong Poo's arm was a pin cushion rather than an arm of a COL. After f***king around for 5mins, Comd got fed up and told him when he reports back after our fieldcamp, he can jolly well sign 21 extras!!! Do i pity the medic as a person? Yes i do.... Do i pity him as a medic? no i don't! Half the stuff he was doing on the field camp left us scratching our heads.... Half my platoon's temperatures were 38-39 degrees and he said that wasn't a fever. Rather because we have been out in the sun running ard like idiots.
But to whoever mentioned this, you're right. In an event of a war, i would prefer my medic to NO medic.
you see what prompted this thought is the fact that after the combat medic course, i've gone for more advcence courses outside, and i realised that some of the things that were taught to me in SMM were rubbish, and you cant blame the instructors, cause they were taught this way by THEIR instructors, who probably didnt know better as well.Originally posted by antoh:dear react81, as a medic for me you must be able to proficently administrator your skills.
case in point. maybe they should have MO or professional paramedic to conduct the course at SMM instead of the NSF instructors.Originally posted by react81:you see what prompted this thought is the fact that after the combat medic course, i've gone for more advcence courses outside, and i realised that some of the things that were taught to me in SMM were rubbish, and you cant blame the instructors, cause they were taught this way by THEIR instructors, who probably didnt know better as well.
i dun realli trust dem after a few of my frend were down with fever. dey need to be IV and the medic at medical centre did a few time of IV. zzz.. =.=Originally posted by react81:Just to play devil's advocate here, but the recent thread on combat medics have led me to think of this question. NOthing against combat medics, i am one myself. But how much does the soldier on the ground trust his medic?
Do you think your medic has the skills to patch you up when you are wounded? To know what to do, and to remain calm enough to do it? Would he be able to resussitate you should you collapse?
And i'm only talking about peace time.
Look forward to hearing your views.
Originally posted by react81:Just to play devil's advocate here, but the recent thread on combat medics have led me to think of this question. NOthing against combat medics, i am one myself. But how much does the soldier on the ground trust his medic?
Do you think your medic has the skills to patch you up when you are wounded? To know what to do, and to remain calm enough to do it? Would he be able to resussitate you should you collapse?
And i'm only talking about peace time.
Look forward to hearing your views.
Well I was a medic too... I encounter quite a lot of problem during my work as a medic.... i admit i was a bit nervous but after 10s i was able to recover from aftershock an do what i was suppose to do and my friends in arm trusted my medical skills... maybe because i was the MOPA(medical officer personal assistance) hahahmany of my man suffer injury in outfield.. the worst place to get injure in with lack of medical support... you should know what i mean....
So i have confidence to say i'm a well train medic..[[/b]